INDETERMINACY IN ARCHITECTURE — CASE STUDY OF THE MIŠELUK PROJECT

Radmila Đurašinović, Miljana Zeković

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.2298/FUACE221123002D
First page
001
Last page
015

Abstract


In the absence of an established city planning strategy, the initial post-war urban development of the SFRY was founded on the principles of CIAM’s “Functional City”, which soon proved inadequate in responding to individual user needs and in reflecting the collective interests of the young socialist state. This paper positions the search for a new spatial expression of the young socialist state within the global architectural discourse of the second half of the twentieth century, which shifted towards more variable, open and indeterminate architectural models employing various forms of user participation. The characteristics of a new approach in Yugoslav architectural and urban planning practice are examined through the case study of an unrealised project for the Mišeluk zone in Novi Sad developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The aim of this paper is to analyse the socialist response to a dominant theme of architectural discourse that is once again gaining traction in the theory and practice of contemporary architects, in order to establish a basis for the further development of these ideas in the contemporary post-socialist context. The research reveals a direction for urban planning practice based on user participation, which enables a higher level of versatility or multivariance of the design concept as a response to the individual and changing needs of users, but also as a way of achieving the resilience, i.e., adaptability of architecture in the face of unpredictable social trends


Keywords

Indeterminacy, user participation, socialist city, Novi Sad

Full Text:

PDF

References


D. Mecanov, “Arhitektonski konkursi na Novom Beogradu od 1947. do 1970. godine”, Nasleđe, vol. 10, pp. 113-140, 2009.

J. R. A. Maier, G. M. Fadel and D. G. Battisto, “An affordance-based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice”, Design Studies, vol. 30 (4), pp. 393–414, 2009.

P. L. Laurence, “Modern (or Contemporary) Architecture circa 1959”, in A Critical History of Contemporary Architecture, E. Haddad and P. Rifkind, Eds. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.

P. Buchanan, “Street urchin: Mothers’ House, Amsterdam, by Aldo van Eyck”, The Architectural Review, 1982. https://www.architectural-review.com/buildings/street-urchin-mothers-house-amsterdam-by-aldo-van-eyck (Accessed: 4 August 2022).

J. Hughes, “Cedric Price: Cedric Price’s Non-Plan Diary”, in Non-plan: essays on freedom participation and change in modern architecture and urbanism, J. Hughes and S. Sadler, Eds. Abingdon: Architectural Press, pp. 22-31, 2000.

X. Van Rooyen and M. Bianchi, “Housing the Multitude: Struggling with Impermanence and Singularities”, The Plan Journal, vol. 4 (1), 2019.

H.S. Plummer, “Liberative Space”, Journal of Architectural Education, vol. 40 (3), pp. 12–23, 1987.

Í.C. Bonal and D. van den Heuvel, “Open Building and User Agency”, in Housing and the City, K. Borsi et al, Eds. London: Routledge, pp. 130–144, 2022.

E.B.-N. Sanders and P.J. Stappers, “Co-creation and the new landscapes of design”, CoDesign, vol. 4 (1), pp. 5–18, 2008.

J. Redström, “Towards user design? On the shift from object to user as the subject of design”, Design Studies, vol. 27 (2), pp. 123–139, 2006.

C. Storni, “Design for future uses: Pluralism, fetishism and ignorance”, Nordes 2013: Experiments in Design Research, vol. 5, pp. 50-59, 2013.

P. Ehn, “Participation in design things”, Participatory Design Conference (PDC). Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 1-4 October, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 92-101, 2008.

D. Milašinović Marić, “Razvojni tokovi u srpskoj arhitekturi od 1945.do 1961. Godine”, Arhitektura i urbanizam, vol. 33, pp. 3-15, 2011.

S. Jović, D. Konstantinović and I. Peško, “Urbanisation as a Tool for Economic Growth – Novi Sad the Developmental City”, Advances in Civil and Architectural Engineering, vol. 13 (25), 2022, (accepted for publishing).

E. Kardelj, Pravci… Beograd: Izdavački centar “Komunist”, 1977.

M. Živković, Prilog jugoslovenskoj urbanoj sociologiji, Beograd: Zavod za organizaciju poslovanja i obrazovanje kadrova, 1981.

D. Prodanović, “Razvoj gradova, razvoj čoveka i urbanističko planiranje”, u Društvo i razvoj gradova, D. Vulović i B. Grubačić, Ur. Beograd: BIGZ, str. 90-95, 1980.

J. Dejanović, Informacija o sprovođenju opštejugoslovenskog konkursa za urbanističko-programsko rešenje zone „Mišeluk“ u Novom Sadu sa programom dalje izrade urbanističke dokumentacije, II sveska. Novi Sad, 1980.

A. Bede, “Prototyping a Provincial Capital: Socialist Modernization of Novi Sad”, Doctoral dissertation, Iuav University of Venice, Venice, 2017.

Projektbiro, Modeli stanovanja u zoni Mišeluka, Beograd: Projektbiro, 1982.

V. Urban, “Sunce hoće na Mišeluk”, Dnevnik, 3. februar, 1979.

R. Žekić, “Rađa se novi grad”, Dnevnik, 25. septembar, 1979.

R. Žekić, “Da ime bude lepo”, Dnevnik, 30. septembar, 1979.

V. Savić, “Grad na četiri sprata”, Dnevnik, 21. februar, 1982.

D. Konstantinović, „Mišeluk: zaboravljeni društveni odgovor“, DaNS | Magazine for Architecture and Urban Planning, 85-86, pp. 34-43, 2019.

Projektbiro, Vanstambeni sadržaji na Mišeluku, Beograd: Projektbiro, 1982.

R. Radosavljević, M. Milosavljević, I. Marinić, Ž. Šolak, N. Lozić-Maglić, R. Obrknežev-Gajić, A. Ristić, J. Grković, i Lj. Sremački, Mišeluk: programska osnova, Novi Sad: URBIS – OOUR Urbanizam, 1982.

B. Popović, “Grad ne treba čoveku da sputava slobodu izbora”, u Društvo i razvoj gradova, D. Vulović i B. Grubačić, Ur. Beograd: BIGZ, str. 80-84, 1980.

“Grad po meri čoveka”, Dnevnik, 30. septembar, 1979.

G. De Carlo, “Architecture’s Public”, in Architecture and Participation, P. Blundell Jones, D. Petrescu and J. Till, Eds. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 3-22, 2009.

W.W. Gaver, J. Beaver, and S. Benford, “Ambiguity as a resource for design”, CHI ’03: Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems, Florida, USA: ACM Press, pp. 233-240, 2003.

R. Đurašinović and M. Zeković, “Pozorište kao generator novog konteksta”, Zbornik radova Fakulteta tehničkih nauka u Novom Sadu, vol. 36 (2), pp. 197–200, 2021.

D. Nedučin, M. Krklješ and S.K. Perović, “Demolition-Based Urban Regeneration from a Post-Socialist Perspective: Case Study of a Neighborhood in Novi Sad, Serbia”, Sustainability, vol. 13, 10430, 2021.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-4605 (Print)
ISSN 2406-0860 (Online)
COBISS.SR-ID 98807559