‘SPECTOR – THE SUSTAINABILITY INSPECTOR’: PARTICIPATORY TEACHING, LEARNING AND EVALUATION GAME FOR ARCHITECTS, ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS AND PUPILS
Abstract
Architects, whether they are researchers, practitioners or teachers need better and improved tools to enable them communicate more effectively, change power relationships, co-construct knowledge and engage in real life problems. It is this that stimulated us to develop our own tool in the form of a game to contribute to the debate. Architects should be able to use their creative potential to design innovative tools for evaluating architectural design, and its sustainable aspects. By using such tools they may also be able to put themselves in a teaching role and create a learning experience for participants. Our experience from testing the game internationally in two primary and one secondary school with pupils made us believe that games need serious attention and consideration as a useful alternative to traditional teaching and research tools.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aldrich, C. (2003) Simulations and the Future of Learning: An Innovative (and Perhaps Revolutionary) Approach to e-Learning, John Wiley & Sons: San Francisco.
Avedon, E.; Sutton-Smith, B. (1971) The Study of Games, Wiley: New York.
Banham, R. (1972). Alternative networks for the alternative culture? In Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference: Design Participation. London, UK: The Design Research Society, 15-19.
Barreteau, O.; Bousquet, F.; Attonaty, J.M. (2001) Role-playing games for opening the black box of multi-agent systems: Method and teachings of its application to Senegal River Valley irrigated systems. Journal of artificial societies and social simulations, 4 (2). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/2/5.html (accessed on 19 March 2015).
Brandt, E. (2006) Designing Exploratory Design Games: A Framework for Participation in Participatory Design? Proceedings of the 9th Participatory Design Conference, Trento, Italy, 1-5 August, 57-66.
Brković, M. (2013) Sustainable schools as the ‘third teacher': Creating a design framework for sustainable schools in Serbia, learning from practices in England, Germany, and Spain.University of Sheffield. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/4513 (accessed on 19 March 2015).
Brković, M., Pons, O. and Parnell, R. (2015) Where sustainable school meets the “third teacher”: Primary school case study from Spain. International Journal of Architectural Research, 9 (2), 77-97. http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/view/539/pdf_52 (accessed on 19 March 2015).
Coleman, R.; Lebbon, C.; Clarkson J.; Keates, S. (2008) Introduction: From margins to mainstream in Clarkson, J.; Coleman, R.; Keates S.; Lebbon, C. eds., Inclusive Design: design for the whole population , Springer-Verlag: London, 1-29.
Crysler, G. (1995) Critical Pedagogy and Architectural Education, Journal of Architectural Education, 48 (4), 208-217.
Dewey, J. (1992) How We Think, Heath and Co: Boston, D.C.
Dieleman, H.; Huisingh, D. (2006) Games by which to learn and teach about sustainable development: exploring the relevance of games and experiential learning for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14 (9-11), 837 – 847.
Ellington, H.; Addinall, E.; Percival, F. (1982) A handbook of Game Design, Kogan: London.
Freigenberg, A. (1991) Learning to teach and teaching to learn, in Dutton, T. A. ed., Voices in Architectural Education: cultural politics and pedagogy, Bergin and Garvey: New York, 149-164.
Gee, J.P. (2007) Good video games and good learning: Collected essays on video games, learning, and literacy, Peter Lang: New York.
Get Involved. http://www.liveprojects.org/ (accessed on 19 March 2015).
Gray, D.; Brown, S.; Macanufo, J. (2010) Gamestorming: A Playbook for Innovators, Rulebreakers, and Changemakers, O'Reilly Media: Sebastopol.
Habraken, H.J.; Gross, M. D. (1984) Concept Design Games. Design Studies, 9 (3), 150-158.
Habraken, H.J.; Gross, M. D., (1987) Concept Design Games (Book 1 and 2). Design Methodology Program. Department of Architecture, MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Hofstein, A.; Rosenfeld, S. (1996) Bridging the Gap Between Formal and Informal Science Learning, Studies in Science Education, 1996, 28 (1), 87-112.
Kelly, G. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Construct Theory, Vol. 1 and 2, Norton: New York.
Kirriemuir, J.; McFarlane, A. (2004) Report 8: Literature Review in Games and Learning’, Futurelab Series, http://telearn.archivesouvertes.fr/docs/00/19/04/53/PDF/kirriemuir-j-2004-r8.pdf (accessed on 19 March 2015).
Kim, J. Story and narrative paradigms in role-playing games. http://www.darkshire.net/jhkim/rpg/theory/
narrative/paradigms.html (accessed on 19 March 2015).
Kolb, D. (1984) Experiential Learning, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Leigh Star, S. (1989) The structure of Ill-structured Solutions: Heterogeneous Problem-Solving, Boundary Objects and Distributed Artificial Intelligence in Kuhns, M. N.; Gasser, L. eds., Distributed Artificial Intelligence Vol. 2, Morgan Kaufman: San Mateo, CA, 37-54.
Lee, Y. C.; Timothy, J.; Frazer, J.H. (2004) Empowerment games: Empathic design probes for user participation in community housing, in Clement, A.; Van den Besselaar, P. eds., Participatory Design 2004- Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices, Toronto, Canada, 27 - 31 July, 179-182.
Lundsgaard, C. (2011) Reversing the co-design process: Co-design tools for post occupancy evaluation. Proceedings of the Nordes’11: The 4th Nordic Design Research Conference Making Design Matter! School of Art and Design, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland, 29-31 May, 234-238.
Malone, T. (1981) Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction, Cognitive Science, 4, 333-370.
Marschall, C; Rossman, G.B. (1995) Designing qualitative research. 2nd ed., SAGE: London.
Messeter, J.; Brandt. E.; Binder, T. (2008) Formatting Design Dialogues - Games and Participation. International Journal of CoDesign in Design and the Arts, 4 (1), 51-64.
Oblinger, D. (2006) Simulations, Games, and Learning. Educase. http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/
pdf/ELI3004.pdf (accessed on 19 March 2015).
Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms – Children, Computers and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books Inc. Publishers: New York.
Prensky, M. (2001) Digital game-based learning, McGraw-Hill: New York.
Rasmusen, E. (2001) Games and information: An introduction to game theory, 3rd ed., Blackwell: Malden.
Reeve, J.K. (2010) Constructivism and Its Application to Game-Based Learning Activities, Insights Into Educational Technology (blog), August 1, 2010, http://blog.wsd.net/jreeve/constructivism-and-its-application-to-game-based-learning-activities/ (accessed on 11 March 2015).
Salama, A. (2005) Skill-Based/Knowledge-based Architectural Pedagogies: An Argument for Creating Humane Environments. Proceedings of 7th International Conference of the International Association of Humane Habitat, Rizvi College of Architecture, Mumbai, India, 29-31 January.
Salen, K.; Zimmerman, E. (2003) Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamental; MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Sanders, E. (2002) ‘From user-centered to participatory design approaches’ in J. Frascara, ed., Design and the Social Sciences, Taylor & Francis: London, 1-8.
Sara, R. (2003) The Pink Book, in Harder, E. ed., Writings in Architectural Education: EAAE Transaction on architectural education No. 15, Copenhagen: EAAE, 120-133.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1968) Novel responses to toys, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 14 (2), p.151-158.
Ramsden, P. (1992) Learning to Teach in Higher Education, Routledge: London.
Webster, H. (2002) Facilitating critically reflective learning: Excavating the role of the design tutor in architectural education. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2 (3), 101-111.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 0354-4605 (Print)
ISSN 2406-0860 (Online)
COBISS.SR-ID 98807559