CUSTOMER INVOLVEMENT AND PRODUCT CONFIGURATORS IN SMEs OKP WITH THE DOMINANT VARIATION OF THE TOPOLOGY

Dejan Aleksić, Dragan Janković

DOI Number
10.22190/FUACR1701049A
First page
49
Last page
60

Abstract


This paper is concerned with the complexity of the configuration process in small-and medium-sized one-of-a-kind production (SMEs OKP) with the dominant variation of the topology from the aspect of the position of customer involvement decoupling point (CIDP), batch size and the complexity of the product configurations process. The issues of the level of the product adjustment to the customer, complexity of the product configuration process, the possibility for the client to be integrated in that early phase of the production and the way of using the data obtained in the product configuration process for generating the final product specification of the customised product in this type of production have been discussed. A special concern has been given to the product complexity paradox, i.e. a risk that a customer may decide not to purchase the product because of too many technical details they encounter while configuring the product, as well as an inevitable extension of the leading time induced by the position of CIDP in this type of production. The division of configurators in three interconnected parts is suggested as the solution for the aforementioned problems: the front-end, middle-end and back-end configurator. The paper emphasises the establishment of the necessary communication channel between the customer, i.e. the front-end configurator and the seller, i.e. the middle end configurator in order to alleviate the effects of the product complexity paradox. A positive effect of the automatic download of the generated data from the front-end and middle-end configurators by the back-end configurator on the leading time reduction has been also discussed.

Keywords

Product configurators, One-of-a-kind production, Customer involvement decoupling point

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson DM. Design for Manufacturability: Optimizing Cost. CIM Press; 1990.

Gitman LJ, Carl DM. The future of business: The essentials. Ohio: South-Western: Mason; 2005.

Rudberg M and JW. Mass customization in terms of the customer order decoupling point. Prod Plan Control 2004;15:445–58.

Pine BJ. Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1993.

Gilmore J, Pine BJ. The four faces of mass customization. Harv Bus Rev 1997;75:91–101.

Fogliatto FS, Da Silveira GJC, Borenstein D. The mass customization decade: An updated review of the literature. Int J Prod Econ 2012;138:14–25.

Risdiyono, Koomsap P. Design by customer: Concept and applications. J Intell Manuf 2013;24:295–311.

Wortmann JC. Factory of the Future : Towards an integrated theory for one- of-a-kind production. IFIP Trans B-APPLICATIONS Technol 1992;2:37–74.

Tseng MM, Piller FT. The Customer Centric Enterprise: Advances in Mass Customization and Personalization. New York, NY: Springer; 2003.

Dean PR, Tu YL, Xue D. An information system for one-of-a-kind production. Int J Prod Res 2009;47:1071–87.

Aleksić DS, Janković DS, Stoimenov L V. A case study on the object-oriented framework for modeling product families with the dominant variation of the topology in the one-of-a-kind production. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2012;59:397–412.

Trentin A, Perin E, Forza C. Sales configurator capabilities to avoid the product variety paradox: Construct development and validation. Comput Ind 2013;64:436–47.

Haug A, Hvam L, Mortensen NH. Definition and evaluation of product configurator development strategies. Comput Ind 2012;63:471–81.

Xie S.Q., Xu X (2006) A STEP-compliant process planning system for sheet metal parts. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 19(6):627-638.

Barnett L, Rahimifard S, Newman S (2004) Distributed scheduling to support mass customization in the shoe industry. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 17:623–632.

Comstock M, Johansen K, Winroth M (2004) From mass production to mass customization: enabling perspectives from the Swedish mobile telephone industry. Production Planning & Control 15:362–372




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUACR1701049A

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 1820-6417
Online ISSN: 1820-6425