NON-FINANCIAL BACKGROUND OF SUCCESS AROUND GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS – EVIDENCE FROM EASTERN EUROPE

Gyorgy Andor, Tamas Toth

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUEO1804305A
First page
305
Last page
317

Abstract


The research is about the relationship between the non-financial firm characteristics and the financial progress around the global financial crisis in 2008-2009. Non-financial firm characteristics data of 218 non-listed Central and Eastern European companies come from a survey in 2006 which focused on the capital budgeting practices and other characteristics of firms – such as presence of Western management culture, firm size, and extent of management ownership. The most important financial indicators are followed up reflecting these firms’ financial progresses – sales, profit before tax, net income, earnings before interest and taxes, total assets, equity, debt, return on equity, return on assets and number of employees – from 2005 to 2012. To analyse firms’ sensibility to the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, differences of financial indicators between the pre-crisis (2005-2008) and post-crisis (2009-2012) periods are examined by the non-financial indicators.

Our results confirm that 1) firms using any accounting-based capital budgeting methods are less sensitive to the financial crisis; 2) small firms are more exposed to a volatile business environment than larger ones; and 3) firms with higher level of management ownership perform better in time of crisis than firms with lower level of management ownership.


Keywords

capital budgeting practice; financial performance; Central and Eastern Europe; global financial crisis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amadeus. (2015). European Company Data, European University Institute. http://www.eui.eu/Research/Library/ResearchGuides/Economics/Statistics/DataPortal/Amadeus.aspx, June.

Andor, Gy. & Toth, T. (2018). Non-financial background of financial performance: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. 25th Annual Multinational Finance Society Conference, Budapest, Hungary, June 24-27

Andor Gy., Toth, T. & S. Mohanty. (2015). Capital Budgeting Practices: A Survey of Central and Eastern European Firms. Emerging Markets Review.

Arnold, G. & Hatzopoulos, P. (2000). The theory-practice gap in capital budgeting: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 27, 603-26.

Brounen, D., De Jong, A. & Koedijk, K. (2004). Corporate finance in Europe: Confronting theory with practice. Financial Management 33 (4), 71-101.

Correia, C. & Cramer, P. (2008). An analysis of cost of capital, capital structure and capital budgeting practices: A survey of South African listed companies. Meditari Accountancy Research, 16 (2), 31-52.

Daunfeldt, S-O. & Hartwig, F. (2014). What Determines the Use of Capital Budgeting Methods? Evidence from Swedish Listed Companies. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2 (4), 101-112.

Fama, E.F. & French, K.R. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of financial economics, 33 (1), 3-56.

Ferguson, M.F. & Shockley, R.L. (2003). Equilibrium “anomalies”. The Journal of Finance, 58 (6), 2549-2580.

Graham, J. & Harvey, C. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics 60 (2), 187-243.

Hazen, G.B. (2003). A new perspective on multiple internal rates of return. The Engineering Economist, 48 (1), 31-51.

Hermes, N., Smid, P. & Yao, L. (2007). Capital budgeting practices: A comparative study of the Netherlands and China. International Business Review, 16 (5), 630-654.

Holmén, M. & Pramborg, B. (2009). Capital budgeting and political risk: Empirical evidence. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 20, 105-134.

Hernádi, P. & Ormos, M. (2012). Capital Structure and Its Choice in Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Oeconomica, 62 (2), 229-263.

Kester, G., Chang, R.P., Echanis, E.S., Haikal, S., Isa, M., Skully, M.T, Tsui, K.C. & Wang, C.J. (1999). Capital budgeting practices in the Asia-Pacific region: Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, and Singapore. Financial Practice and Education, 9 (1), 25-33.

Liljeblom, E. & Vaihekoski, M. (2004). Investment evaluation methods and required rate of return in Finnish publicly listed companies. Finnish Journal of Business and Economics, 54, 9–24.

Maquieira, C.P., Preve, L.A. & Sarria-Allende, V. (2012). Theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence and distinctive features in Latin America. Emerging Markets Review, 13 (2), 118-148.

Mendes-Da-Silva, W. & Saito, R. (2014). Stock Exchange Listing Induces Sophistication of Capital Budgeting. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 54 (5), 560-574.

Osborne, M.J. (2010). A resolution to the NPV–IRR debate?. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50 (2), 234-239.

Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W. and Jordan, B.D. (2010). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. Tata McGraw Hill Education, Inc., New York.

Singh, S., Jain, P.K. & Yadav, S.S. (2012). Capital budgeting decisions: evidence from India. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 9 (1), 96-112.

Truong G., Partington, G. & Peat, M. (2008). Cost of capital estimation and capital budgeting practice in Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 33, 1-6.

Wade M.D. & Parkhe, A. (2012). Hungarian-Western Partnerships: A Grounded Theoretical Model of Integration Processes and Outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (3), 423-455.

Weber, T.A. (2014). On the (Non-) Equivalence of IRR and NPV. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 52, 25-39.

Von Weltzien Hoivik, H. (2007). East Meets West: Tacit Messages about Business Ethics in Stories Told by Chinese Managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 74 (4), 457-469.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUEO1804305A

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-4699 (Print)

ISSN 2406-050X (Online)