EFFECTUATION AND CAUSATION DECISION MAKING LOGICS OF MANAGING UNCERTAINTY AND COMPETITIVENESS BY NIGERIAN RETAIL BUSINESS ENTREPRENEURS

Christopher Idemudia Ebegbetale

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUEO210311011E
First page
157
Last page
168

Abstract


Uncertainty is a major dimension of business that alters business plans and courses of actions. Hence, this study primarily examined how entrepreneurs deal with uncertainty using both effectual and causal logics. The study design was cross-sectional while multistage sampling technique was used to collect primary data. These data were analysed using bivariate correlation and hierarchical regression techniques of SPSS version 23. The results of the correlation analysis showed that causation and three of the four sub-dimensions of effectuation had significant relation with competitiveness while pre-commitment did not. The analysis further showed that Nigerian retail entrepreneurs tended more towards causation and effectuation. The results from the hierarchical regression revealed that causation made the most unique impact on competitiveness and was closely followed by experimentation and flexibility. However, affordable loss and pre-commitment did not. This study contributed to knowledge by empirically showing that entrepreneurs will not always be more effectual oriented in all cases. It also confirmed that causation and effectuation should be seen as complementary and not exclusive strategies.

Keywords

effectuation, causation, competitiveness, retail business, Nigerian entrepreneurs, uncertainty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). How Do Entrepreneurs Organize Firms Under Conditions of Uncertainty?. Journal of Management, 31(5), 776–793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279486

Bain, J. (1968). Industrial Organization (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Brettel, M., Mauer, R., Engelen, A., & Küpper, D. (2012). Corporate effectuation: Entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001

Chandler, G. N., DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Mumford, T. V. (2011). Causation and effectuation processes: A validation study. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(3), 375-390.

Dew, N., Sarasvathy, S. D., Read, S., & Wiltbank, R. (2008). Immortal firms in mortal markets? An entreprenuerial perspective on the innovator's dilemma. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(3), 313-329.

Dias, S. E. F., Iizuka, E. S., & Boas, E. P. V. (2019). Effectuation theoretical debate: Systematic review and research agenda. Innovation & Management Review, 17(1), 41-57.

Eijdenberg, E. L., Paas, L. J., & Masurel, E. (2017). Decision-making and small business growth in Burundi. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeee-12-2015-0065

Eyana, S. M., Masurel, E., & Paas, L. J. (2018). Causation and effectuation behaviour of Ethiopian entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2017-0079

Frese, T., Geiger, I., & Dost, F. (2019). An empirical investigation of determinants of effectual and causal decision logics in online and high-tech start-up firms. Small Business Economics, Springer, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00147-8

Grégoire, D. A., & Cherchem, N. (2019). A structured literature review and suggestions for future effectuation research. Small Business Economics, 1-19.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multi-variate Data Analysis (7th ed). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th edn.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Henninger, P., Brem, A., Giones, F., Bican, P. M., & Wimschneider, C. (2020). Effectuation vs. causation: Can established firms use start-up decision-making principles to stay innovative?. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(01), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1363919620500024

Laine, I., & Galkina, T. (2017). The interplay of effectuation and causation in decision making: Russian SMEs under institutional uncertainty. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(3), 905-941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0423-6

Matalamäki, M., Vuorinen, T., Varamäki, E., & Sorama, K. (2017). Business growth in established companies: Roles of effectuation and causation. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 25(02), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218495817500054

McKelvie, A., DeTienne, D. R., & Chandler, G. N. (2013). What is the appropriate dependent variable in effectuation research?. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 33(4), 4.

Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 20–35.

National Survey of Micro Small & Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) 2017

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994) Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Read, S., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2005). Knowing what to do and doing what you know: Effectuation as a form of entrepreneurial expertise. Journal of Private Equity, 9(1), 45-62.

Read, S., Song, M., & Smit, W. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 573-587.

Sarasvathy, S. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Towards a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26, 243–263.

Wang, H. (2014). Theories for competitive advantage. In H. Hasan (Eds.), Being Practical with Theory: A Window into Business Research (pp. 33-43).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUEO210311011E

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-ND
ISSN 0354-4699 (Print)
ISSN 2406-050X (Online)