THE COMPLEXITY PARADIGM: TOWARDS A MODEL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL SYSTEMS AND PROBLEMS

Artur Parreira, Ana Lorga Silva

DOI Number
-
First page
435
Last page
455

Abstract


The article proposes the complexity paradigm as an innovative reasoning for analyzing problems in behavioral sciences. It begins to explain the contributions of the major authors of the complex reasoning paradigm: Gödel, Prigogine and Morin. They offer the basis to a model of analysis and assessment of complex systems and problems (ACSIP Model). The four postulates of the Model are explained, emphasizing the principal hypothesis of the Model – the level of cognitive operations is the most important factor of complexity of a system; then to understand it, the cognitive level of analysis must be at minimum equal to that of the system or the problem under analysis. In the second part the article, an illustrative application of the ACSIP Model is applied to the analysis of the SDG 9 from the UN 20/30 agenda, showing the analysis of a complex problem, guided by the complexity reasoning model. Following that, an empirical research is presented, to verify the hypothesis underlying the fourth postulate of the model. The results confirm the hypothesis: the use of information by a group is inversely proportional to the use of power (authority).  These results allow us to conclude that the complex reasoning paradigm is a promising tool to obtain synergic results in the scientific analysis and resolution of concrete social problems and to face the complex challenges brought by artificial intelligence systems.


Keywords

Morin’s operators; Cognitive complexity; ACSIP Model; Socioeconomic inequalities; Results synergy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albin, P., & Göttinger, H. (1983). Structure and Complexity. Economic and Social Systems. Mathematical Social Systems, 5, 253-68.

Atlan, H. (1994). Entre le Crystal et la Fumée: essai sur l’organisation du Vivant [Between the crystal and the smoke: an essy on the organization of living systems]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Bachelard, G. (1940). La Philosophie du Non [The No Philosophy]. Paris: PUF

Bancaleiro, J. (2006). Scorecard de Capital Humano - Como medir o activo mais importante da sua empresa [Human Capital: how to measure the most importante asseto f your business]. Lisbon: Editora RH.

Bar-On, Reuven, Maree, J. G., & Elias, M. J. (2005). Educating people to be emotionally intelligent. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Publishers.

Bieri, J. (1955). Cognitive Complexity-Simplicity and Predictive Behavior. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(2), 263–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043308

Bruner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, A. (1956). A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.

Brundtland, G. (1987). Our Common Future—Call for Action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900016805

Carvalho, R. F. (2017). As contribuições do físico-químico Ilya Prigogine para uma nova compreensão da História [The contributions of the physicist-chemist Ilya Prigogine to a new understanding of history]. Brasília, 24-28, july. Proceedings of XXIX National Simposium on History - Against prejudice: History and Democracy.

D’Alkaine, C. V. (2006). Os trabalhos de Gödel e as denominadas ciências exatas. Em homenagem ao centenário do nascimento de Kurt Gödel [Gödel's works and the so- called exact sciences. In tribute to the centenary of the birth of Kurt Gödel]. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 28,(4), 525-530. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-47442006000400015

Davenport, Th., & Prusak. L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business Press

Day, D. (Ed.) (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Leadership and Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eddington, A. S. (2014). The Nature of the Physical World. An Annotated Edition Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2007). Manual de psicologia cognitiva Handbook of Cognitive Psychology (5ª ed.). Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas.

Ferreira, F. (2006). A matemática de Kurt Gödel [Kurt Gödel’s Mathematics]. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Matemática, 55, 39-62.

Gödel, K. (1986). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I. (1931) [On formally undecidable propositions of Principia Mathematica and related systems]. In Solomon Feferman, (ed.), Kurt Gödel Collected works, Vol. I. Oxford University Press: 144-195.

Goleman, D. (1996). Inteligência Emocional [Emotional Intelligence]. Lisbon: Círculo de Leitores,

Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The Quark and the Jaguar. Londres: Little Brown and Co.

Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit [Being And Time]. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

Hooijberg, R., James, G. H., & Dodge, G. E. (1997). Leadership Complexity and Development of the leaderplex Model. Journal of Management Leadership, 23(3), 375-408.

Karlins, M. (1967). Conceptual complexity and remote-associative proficiency as creativity variables in a complex problem-solving task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(3), 264-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0024740

Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At home in the Universe: the search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs, vol. 1. New York: Norton.

Kochugovindan, S., & Vriend, N. J. (1998). Is the Study of Complex Adaptive Systems Going to Solve the Mystery of Adam Smith’s “Invisible Hand”?. The Independent Review, v.III, n.1, 53–66.

Kubrusly, R. S. (2006). Uma viagem informal ao teorema de Gödel (ou o preço da matemática é o eterno erro matemático) [An informal trip to the gödel theorem (or the price of mathematics is the eternal mathematician error)]. im/ufrj

Lannes, W. (2014). Sobre as implicações do Teorema de Gödel na organização social de Matemáticos e Lógicos no Século XX [On the implications of Gödel's Theorem in the social organization of Mathematicians and Logicians in the 20th Century]. Proceedings of 14º National Symposium on History of Science and Technology Belo Horizonte, Campus Pampulha, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, 08-11 de october.

Le Moigne. (1999). Inteligência da Complexidade [Intelligence of Complexity]. In: Pena-Vega, A., Almeida, E.P. (Orgs.). O pensar complexo: Edgar Morin e a crise da modernidade Complex thinking: Edgar Morin and the crisis of modernity Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.

Lichtenstein, B. B., & Plowman, D. A. (2009). The leadership of emergence: A complex systems leadership theory of emergence at successive organizational levels. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 617-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.006

Massoni, N. T. (2008). Ilya Prigogine: uma contribuição à filosofia da ciência [Ilya Prigogine: a contribution to the philosophy of science]. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 30(2), 2308-1–2308-8.

Mitchell, T. (1971). Cognitive Complexity and Group performance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 86(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1972.9918592

Morin, E. (1977). La Methode 1. La Nature de la Nature. [The Method 1. The Nature of the Nature]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil

Morin, E. (1990). Introduction à la pensée complexe [Introduction to Complex Thinking]. ESF, Paris

Morin, E. (2001). L’Humanité de l’humanité (t. 5), L’identité humaine [The Humanity of Humanity, 5: Human Identity]. Paris: Le Seuil.

Morin, E. (2011). Mes Philosophes [My Philosophers]. Paris: Éditions Germina.

Neufeld, C. B., & Stein, L. M. (1999). As bases da Psicologia Cognitiva [The Bases of Cognitive Psychology]. Revista da Saúde, 3(2), URCAMP, jul./dez.

Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I. (1989). Exploring complexity: An introduction. NY: W. H. Freeman.

Nicolescu, B. (1999). O Manifesto da Transdisciplinaridade [Transdisciplinarity Manifest]. São Paulo: TRIOM.

Nidorf, L. J., & Crockett, W. H. (1965). Cognitive Complexity and the Integration of Conflicting Information in Written impressions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 66(1), 165-169, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1965.9919632

Parreira, M. (2010). Liderança: A Fórmula Multiplex [Leadership: The Multiplex Formula]. Lisbon: Edições Sílabo.

Parreira, A. & Lorga da Silva, A. (2016). The use of numerical value of adverbs of quantity and frequency in the measurement of behavior patterns: transforming ordinal scales into interval scales. Revista Ensaio – Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação, 24(90), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362016000100005

Pestana, H., Parreira, A., & Moutinho, L. (2020). Motivations, emotions and satisfaction: The keys to a tourism destination choice. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 16, 100332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2018.12.006

Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1997). A nova aliança: metamorfose da ciência. [The new Alliance: Science Metamorphosis]. Brasília: Editora UnB

Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (2009). Entre le Temps et l’Éternité. [Between Time and Eternity]. Paris: Flammarion

Prigogine, I. (1997). The End of Certainty: Time, Chaos, and the New Laws of Nature. New York: The Free Press.

Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006

Sher, G. (1999). What is Tarski’s Theory of Truth?. Topoi 18, 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006246322119

Schröder, H. M. (1971a). Conceptual Complexity and Personality Organization. In: Schröder and Suedfeld (Eds.) Personality Theory and Information Processing. Ronald Press.

Simon H. A. (1962). The Architecture of Complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467-482. http://www.jstor.org/stable/985254

_______ (1987). Bounded rationality. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman (Eds.). The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 266-268). London, England: Macmillan.

Skow, B. (2015). Objective Becoming. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship

Streufert, S., & Streufert, S. C. (1969). Effects of conceptual structure, failure, and success on attribution of causality and interpersonal attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027047

Streufert, S., & Streufert, S. C. (1978). Behavior in the complex environment. V. H. Winston & Sons.

Streufert, S., & Swezey, R. W. (1986). Complexity, managers, and organizations. Academic Press.

Streufert, S. (2006). Complexity: An Integration of Theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27(23), 2068–2095. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01641.x

Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002

UN (2017). UN 20/30 agenda: Ministerial Declaration on Sustainable Development. July 19, 2017 Session, 46th Meeting.

Wiener, N. (1961). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine (2nd ed.). MIT Press; John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/13140-000


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons License CC BY-NC-ND
ISSN 0354-4699 (Print)
ISSN 2406-050X (Online)