Maja Lj. Nastic

DOI Number
First page
Last page


After the Constitutional Court of Serbia dismissed the motion for assessment of constitutionality of the so-called Brussels Agreement in  December a year ago, it has been actualized the issue of the constitutional review of international agreements. The aim of the  paper is to analyze the constitutional review of international agreements from the perspective of the following states: Austria, Germany, France, Spain. Our starting point is the international treaty may be subject, as well as basis of constitutional review, which depends on its status in the national legal system. Further, we notice that constitutional review of international treaties has some features that distinguishes it from the review of law or other legal act; in particular, as regards  the effects of the Constitutional Court’s decisions. Our intention is to analyze the rulings in our system through the comparative perspective of mentioned countries.  

Full Text:



Aucoin, L. Judicial review in France: Access of the Individual UnderFrench and European Community Law in the Aftermath of France’s Rejection of Bicentennial Reform. Boston College International and Comparative Law Review. Vol. 15. Issue 2.1992. 443-469.

Brotóns R. A. The Spanish Constitution and International Law. Spanish YearbooK of International Law. Vol. IX. 27-61. 2003.

Decaux, E. France u: Shelton, D. International Law and Domestic Legal Systems. Incroporation, Transformation, and Persuasion. Oxford University Press. 2011.

Đajić, S. Međunarodni i nacionalni sudovi: od sukoba do saradnje. Novi Sad. Pravni fakultet, Centar za izdavačku delatnost. 2004.

Sorian C. M. The Reception Process in Spain and Italy. U: Keller, H. Alec Stone S. A Europe of rights. The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems. Oxford University Press. 2008.

Kokott, J. Kaspar, M. Ensuring Constitutional Efficacy. U : Rosenfeld, M. Sajo, A. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional law. Oxford University Press. 2012.

Marković, R. Ustavni sud u Ustavu Republike Srbije od 2006. godine. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. No.2. 19-46. 2007.

Nikolić, P. Nužnost i legitimnost ustavnog sudstva u demokratskim sistemima. Pravni život. 12. 177-184. 1995.

Pejić, I. Ustavni sud i kontrola ustavnosti međunarodnih ugovora. Pravni život. 12. 741-756. 2008.

Stojanović, R. Pokretanje normativne kontrole prava u evropskom modelu ustavnog pravosuđa. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 67. 59-78. 2014

Frowein. J. A. ‘’Germany’’ in Eisemnann, P.M. (ed.) The Integration of international and European Community Law into the National legal order. Kluwer, London. 1996.

Foster, N. Austrian Legal System & Laws. Cavendish Publishing. 2003.

Handl-Petz. E. Austria. U: Shelton, D.(ed.).International Law and Domestic Legal Systems. Incorporation, Transformation, and Persuasion. Oxford University Press. 2011.

Pajvančić, M. Komentar Ustava Srbije. Beograd. Fondacija Konrad Adenauer. 2009.

Rupp, H.G. Judicial review of international agreements: Federal Republic of Germany. American Journal of Comparative Law. 25. 286-302. 1977.

Stone, A. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France:The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press. 1992.

Vanberg, G. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany, Cambridge. 2005.

Vučić, O. Čuvar austrijske federacije (dr. disertacija). Beograd. 1995.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)