PSYCHOLOGICAL ISSUES IN FAMILY MEDIATION

Dejan Janićijević

DOI Number
10.22190/FULP1604505J
First page
505
Last page
514

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to point out to certain problems that may appear in the course of family mediation, whose overcoming does not require only legal but also psychological knowledge and skills on the mediator’s part. The causes of multiple barriers to mutually agreed family dispute resolutions are recognized in the effect of psychological factors, such as excessive optimism, degree of tolerance, risk or loss aversion, reactive devaluation, insisting on the personal understanding of justice, etc. At the end of the paper, the concrete approaches to family disputes are offered to potential mediators.

Keywords

mediation, family dispute, psychology, agreement

Full Text:

PDF

References

Armour, D.A., Taylor, S.E. – When Predictions Fail: The Dilemma of Unrealistic Optimism, in Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2002)

Brehm, J. – A Theory of Psychological Reactance, New York, Academic Press (1966)

Dunning, D., Griffin, D.W., Mijokovic, J.D., Ross, L. – The Overconfidence Effect in Social Predictions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58 (1990)

Ekman, P – Facial Expression аnd Emotion, American Psychologist, 48 (1993)

Glater, J. “Study Finds Settling is Better Than Going to Trial,” Business Section, New York Times, August 7 (2008)

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. – Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk, 47, Econometrica 263, (1979)

Keltner, D., Robinson, R.J. – Imagined Ideological Difference in Conflict Escalation and Resolution. International Journal of Conf ict Management, 4 (1993)

Kiser, R. L.; Asher, M. A; and McShane B. B. – Let’s Not Make a Deal; An Empirical Study of Decision Making and Unsuccessful Settlement Negotiations, 5 J. Empirical Legal Studies (2008)

Korobkin, R. – Psychological Impediments to Mediation Success: Theory and Practice, 21 Ohio St. J. on Dispute Resolution (2006)

Kramer, R.M., Messick, D.– Negotiation as a Social Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, (1995)

Loewenstein, G.E., et al. – Social Utility and Decision Making in Interpersonal Contexts, 57 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol. (1989)

Lowenstein, G.D., Schkade, D. – Wouldn’t it be Nice? Predicting Future Feelings. In D. Kahneman and E. Diener (Eds.), Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation (1999)

Mnookin, R., Ross, L.– Strategic, Psychological and Institutional Barriers: An Introduction: in Barriers to Conflict Resolution (Kenneth J. Arrow, et al., eds.) (1995)

Mook, J. – Motivation. New York: Prentice Hall (2000)

Morris, M. W., Gelfand, M. J. – Cultural Differences and Cognitive Dynamics; Expanding the Cognitive Perspective on Negotiation. In The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press ( 2004)

Neale, M. A., Bazerman, M.H.– Cognition and Rationality in Negotiation. New York: Free Press (1991)

Priest, G. L., Klein, B. – The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 J. Legal Stud. 1 (1984).

Pruitt, D. G. – Negotiation Behavior, New York: Academic Press (1981)

Raiffa, H. – The Art and Science of Negotiation, Cambridge, MA: Belknap (1982)

Ross, L. – Reactive Devaluation in Negotiation and Conflict Resolution, in Barriers to Conflict Resolution, p. 26, p.28 (Kenneth J. Arrow et al., eds.) (1995)

Ross, L., Ward, A. – Naive Realism; Implications for Social Conflict and Misunderstanding, in Barriers to Conflict Resolution, (Kenneth J. Arrow et al.,eds.) (1995)

Walster, E., et al. – New Directions in Equity Research, 25 J. Personality & Soc. Psychol., ( 1973)




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22190/FULP1604505J

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)