LEGAL PRINCIPLES AS TELEOLOGICAL LEGAL ATTITUDES IN THE LEGAL ORDER OF A STATE OF LAW

Miloš Prica

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP2101027P
First page
027
Last page
054

Abstract


This article presents the difference between legal norms and legal principles.  The author’s viewpoint is based on the differentiation between regulatory, systemic and teleological legal attitudes in the legal order of a state of law (Rechtsstaat). The conceptual framework of legal principles entails constituent laws and different areas of a legal order. Unlike legal norms (as subject-specific regulating legal attitudes) and legal standards (as the most general legal attitudes), legal principles are radiating teleological legal attitudes. Moreover, being the result of systemic and teleological concretisation of written law, legal principles as basic teleological legal attitudes are shaped as bundles of teleological legal attitudes and legal conceptions. In the order of a legal state, legal principles have a circular flow in the operation of the legal order, which is determined by the complementary roles of the institutional order of public authority, the institutional order of state authority, and the institutional order of a territorial community. It necessarily brings to light the difference between the fundamental legal principles of a legal order and the legal principles governing different areas of a legal order. This article analyzes the aspects of systemic and teleological understanding of legal principles, particularly considering the distinctive nature of legal principles as sources of law. Legal principles are also viewed as canons directly developed in jurisprudence, within the framework of the “internal legal system” based on legal forms.

Keywords

legal principles, legal grounds, cause and purpose of legal regulation, legal standards, legal norms, legal situations, “internal legal system”

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexy, R. (2015). Teorija pravne argumentacije, teorija racionalnog diskursa kao teorija pravnog utemeljenja, (A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification), Zagreb.

Bydlinski, F. (2011). Pravna metodologija, osnovi nauke o pravnim metodima, (Legal Methodology and Legal Concept), Podgorica.

Bobbio, N. (1988). Eseji iz teorije prava (Essays in the General Theory of Law), Split.

Bobbio, N. (19985). Liberalizam i demokratija (Liberalism and democracy), Beograd.

Bovan, S. (2012). "Tumačenje prava kao vrednovanje na osnovu konteksta - prilog konstruktivnoj teoriji tumačenja” (Interpretation of Law as Evaluation Based on Context - A Contribution to Constructive Theory of Interpretation), Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, no. 1, 83-106.

Bovan, S. (2016). Pravna hermeneutika između filozofije i logike, sociološki metod u tumačenju i primeni prava (Legal Hermeneutics between Philosophy and Logic, a Sociological Method in the Interpretation and Application of Law), Beograd.

Braibant, G. (2002). Administrativno pravo Francuske (French Administrative Law), Podgorica.

Vodinelić, V. (2014). Građansko pravo, Uvod u građansko pravo i opšti deo građanskog prava (Civil Law, Introduction to Civil Law, and the General Part of Civil Law), second amended edition, Beograd

Dilthey, W. (1924). Beiträge zum Studium der Indiviualität, in: Die geistige Welt, Gesammelte Schriften, V.

Duguit, L. (1927). Traité de droit constitutionnel, I, 3-e éd., Paris.

Djurdjić, V. Trajković, M. (2011). "Da li je dopuštena analogija u krivičnom pravu” (Is Analogy Allowed in Criminal Law), Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, br. 58, 1-22.

Živanović, T. (1997). Sistem sintetičke pravne filozofije, sintetička filozofija prava I (A System of Synthetic Legal Philosophy, Synthetic Philosophy of Law), Beograd.

Jhering, R. (1998). Cilj u pravu (The Goal in Law), Podgorica.

Jesch, D. (1957). "Unbestimmter Rechtsbegriff und Ermessen in rechtstheoretischer und verfassungsrechtlicher Sicht", Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, Bd. 82, 163-249.

Jovanović, N. (2008). Klјučne razlike engleskog i srpskog ugovornog prava (Key Differences of English and Serbian Contractual Law), Beograd.

Kant, I. (1974). Um i sloboda (Reason and Freedom), Beograd.

Lukić, R. (1995). Metodologija prava (Methodology of Law), Beograd.

Lukić, R. (1995). Teorija države i prava II (Theory of State and Law II) Teorija prava (Theory of Law), Beograd.

Marković, R. (2008). Ustavno pravo i političke institucije (Constitutional Law and Political Institutions), Beograd.

Perelman, Ch. (1983). Pravo, moral i filozofija (Droit, morale et philosophie), Beograd.

Petrović, M. (1981). Pravna vezanost i ocena celishodnosti državni vlasti i organa (Legal Connectedness and Assessment of Expediency of State Authorities and Bodies), Savremena administracija, Beograd.

Petrović, M. (1987). "K pitanju sukoba zakona u vremenu” (To the Issue of Conflict of Laws in Time), Otisak iz Zbornika za teoriju prava, III, (Iz teorije prava, knj. 7, Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti, Odelјenje društvenih nauka), Beograd, 307-324.

Petrović, M. (2013). "K pravnoj prirodi crkvenoga prava. Ujedno zasnivanje trijalističke teorije prava” (To Legal Nature of Church Law. Simultaneously, Founding of A Trialist Theory of Law), Zbornik radova: 1700 godina Milanskog edikta, Niš, 167-208.

Petrović, M. in cooperation with Prica, M. (2014). Posebno upravno pravo sa međunarodnim upravnim pravom (Special Administrative Law with International Administrative Law), Niš.

Petrović, M. (2015). "Prilog učenju o osnovnim pojmovima trijalističke teorije države i prava” (A Contribution to the Study of Basic Concepts of Trialist Theory of Law), Zbornik radova fakulteta u Nišu, no. 70, 195-227.

Petrović, M. (2015). „Pravni poredak u poimanju Radomira D. Lukića i utemelјenje trijalističko-teleološke teorije prava” (Legal Order as Conceived by Radomir D. Lukić and the Establishment of Trialist and Teleological Theory of Law), Zbornik radova: Naučno nasleđe Radomira D. Lukića, SANU, Beograd, 135-157.

Petrović, M. in cooperation with Prica, M. (2015). Uvod u velike pravne i upravne sisteme sa evropskim upravnim pravom (Introduction to Large Legal and Administratice Systems with European Administrative Law), Niš.

Popović, D. (1984). Odstupanje od krivice kao osnova vanugovorne odgovornosti za štetu u francuskome i nemačkomu pravu (1838-1943) (Derogation from Culpability as a Basis for Non-contractual Liability for Damage in French and German Laws), doctoral dissertation, Beograd.

Popović, D. (2005). Uvod u uporedno pravo (Introduction to Comparative Law), Beograd, 2005.

Popović, D. (2009). "Pilot presude Evropskog suda za lјudska prava” (Pilot Judgements of the European Court of Human Rights), Bilten Vrhovnog suda Srbije, no. 1, 220-237.

Prica, M. (2014). “O pojmu i pravnom karakteru održivog razvoja: da li postoji ekološko pravo” (On the Concept and Legal Character of Sustainable Development: Does Ecological Law Exist), Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, no. 67, 291-318.

Prica, M. (2016). Eksproprijacija kao pravni institut, doktorska disertacija (Expropriation as Legal Institut)”, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu.

Prica, M. (2018). "Jedinstvo pravnog poretka kao ustavno načelo i zakonsko uređivanje oblasti pravnog poretka” (Unity of Legal Order as the Constitutional Principle and Legal Regulation of Legal Order Areas), Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, no. 78, 103-126.

Prica, M. (2018). Pravni principi u poretku pravne države: kanoni pravnog poretka i "unutrašnjeg pravnog sistema” (Legal principles in the law-governed state order: the cannons of legal order and “inner legal system, Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, no. 80, 135-180.

Radbruh, R. (1980). Filozovija prava (Philosophy of Law), Beograd.

Savigny, F.C. (1998). Zakonodavstvo i pravna nauka (Legislation and Legal Science), CID, Podgorica.

Sič, M. (2015) "Tumačenje prava u skladu sa pravičnošću u rimskom pravu” (Interpretation of Law according to Fairness in Roman Law), Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, no. 2, 617-633.

Spaić, B. (2017). "Dva poimanja pravnih principa” (Two Conceptions of Legal Principles), Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, no. 1, 109-130.

Stojanović, D. (2016). "Ustavni sud u svetlu interpretativnih odluka u normativnoj kontroli” (The Constitutional Court in the Light of Interpretative Decisions in Normative Control), Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, no. 72, 37-54.

Canaris, C.-W. (1969). Systemdenken und Systembegriff in der Jurisprudenz, Berlin.

Heidegger, M. (2007). Bitak i vreme (Sein und Zeit), Beograd.

Hart, H. (2013). Pojam prava (The Concept of Law), Beograd.

Hasanbegović, J. (1988). Perelmanova pravna logika kao nova retorika (Perelmans’s Legal Logic as New Rhetoric), Beograd.

Hasanbegović, J. (2014). "Normativista bez normi? - Radomir D. Lukić u sistemu filozofije prava” (A Normativist without Norms? - Radomir D. Lukić in the System of Philosophy of Law), Naučno nasleđe Radomira D. Lukića, Zbornik radova sa naučnog skupa održanog 11-12. decembra 2014, SANU, Beograd, 2015, 69-81.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1911). Grundlinien Philosphie des Rechts - Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrise, Leipzig.

Hefe, O. (2008). Pravda: Filozofski uvod (Justice: A Philosophical Introduction), Novi Sad.

Schmidt, K. (2001). Legalnost i legitimnost, Karl Šmit i njegovi kritičari (Legality and Legitimacy, Karl Schmidt and his Critics), Beograd.

Schmidt, K. (2003). Tri vrste pravnonaučnog mišlјenja (Three Types of Law and Scientific Thinking), Dosije, Beograd.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP2101027P

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)