‘CONVERTING’ DIFC JUDGMENTS INTO ARBITRAL AWARDS: PRACTICE DIRECTION No. 2 OF 2015 AND ITS CONTROVERSIES

Miljana Todorović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP2101055T
First page
055
Last page
069

Abstract


This paper examines the DIFC Practice Direction No.2 of 2015, which provides a possibility of judgment conversion into an arbitral award. In certain cases, this mechanism allows a judgment to become the basis of an arbitral award if parties agree to refer a 'judgment payment dispute' to arbitration. As a result, it would be possible to enforce an award rendered in this procedure under the New York Convention. In the beginning, a short overview is given of the organisation of the DIFC Courts and the Arbitration Center, their main features, and the enforcement of the DIFC judgments and arbitral awards abroad. Following is a detailed interpretation of Practice Direction No.2, the suggested arbitration clause and the referral criteria, their evolution, and the drafter's intention hidden in its wording. The last part deals with controversies in the use and the effect of Practice Direction No. 2, especially the negative effect of the elimination of the review of a judgment, the possibility of the arbitral tribunal to rehear the dispute, and the risk of double recovery. Notwithstanding the feasibility of the application of the New York Convention to enforce an arbitral award resulting from the use of the arbitral clause recommended in Practice Direction No. 2, the use of this mechanism would have an eliminating effect on the review of due process and public policy, which would normally be performed in a court exequatur.


Keywords

Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC), arbitration, judgment, arbitral award, enforcement

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alustath, H., (2016), Choice of Law in respect of contracts in the United Arab Emirates and the EU; and related aspects of PIL in relation to the DIFC, PhD, Retrieved 17 Jun, 2021, from http://repository.essex.ac.uk/15979/1/Final%20Draft_Thesis.pdf

Amended Practice Direction No.2 from May 2015, DIFC-LCIA, Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021, from https://www.difccourts.ae/rules-decisions/practice-directions/amended-difc-courts-practice-direction-no-2-of-2015-referral-of-judgment-payment-disputes-to-arbitration

Arbitration Law No. 1, DIFC-LCIA, (2008), Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021, https://www.difc.ae/files/9614/5448/9173/Arbitration_Law_DIFC_Law_No_1_of_2008.pdf

Arbitration Rules, DIFC-LCIA, (2016), Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021, from http://www.difc-lcia.org/arbitration-rules-2016.aspx

Arbitration Rules, DIFC-LCIA, (2021), Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021, from http://www.difc-lcia.org/arbitration-rules-2021.aspx

Arrest No. 21/2017 from 16 February 2017, Belgian Constitutional Court, Retrieved 17 Jun, 2021, from https://www.const-court.be/public/n/2017/2017-021n.pdf?fbclid=IwAR1D5RQ_KTrRiITc2EFG2hmY0-KCC7WYTGH3O-fDgwuCtEPS8V1h2eAU-Q8

Birt, A., Omran, A., (2019), United Arab Emirates, IBA Arbitration Committee, Arbitration Guide.

Blanke, G., DIFC Courts Practice Direction No.2 of 2015: Adopted at Last!, Retrieved 16 Jun, 2021, from http://arbitrationblog.kluwerarbitration.com/2015/03/31/difc-courts-practice-direction-no-2-of-2015-adopted-at-last/?doing_wp_cron=1592229685.2594530582427978515625 (16/06/2021)

Brekoulakis, S., (2009), The Relevance of the Interests of Third Parties in Arbitration, Taking a Closer Look at the Elephant in the Room, 113 Penn St. L. Rev., 2009, pp. 1165-1188.

Carballo, A., (2007), The Law of the Dubai International Financial Centre: Common Law Oasis or Mirage within the UAE?, Arab Law Quarterly, Vol. 21. No. 1, 2007, pp. 91-104.

Case 508 F.2d 969 Parsons & Whittemore Overseas Co., Inc., v. Societe Generale De L'industrie Du Papier (rakta), and Bank of America, Defendants, Societe Generale de L'industrie.

Case 92-15.137 Société Hilmarton Ltd v. Société Omnium de traitement et de valorisation (OTV).

Convention on choice of Court Agreements concluded 30 June 2005.

Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (1985).

Demeter, D., Smith, K., (2016). The Implications of International Commercial Courts on Arbitration, Journal of International Arbitration, Vol.33, 2016, pp. 441-470.

DIFC Annual Review (2015), Retrived 17 Jun, 2021, from https://www.difc.ae/newsroom/publications/

DIFC Courts Strategic Plan 2016-2021, Retrieved 17 Jun, 2021, from https://issuu.com/difccourts/docs/difc_courts_strategic_plan_2016-202?e=29076707/47176868

Dubai International Financial Centre, selected documents, (2007-2008), Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern law, Vol. 13, pp. 351-422.

Dubai Law No.16 (2011), Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021, from https://www.difccourts.ae/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Dubai_Law_No.16_of_2011_English.pdf

Federal decree No.35 (2004), Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021, from https://www.dfsa.ae/application/files/6215/8211/4263/Federal-Decree-No-35-of-2004_1.pdf

Horigan, D., (2009), The New Adventures of the Common Law, Pace Int’l L. Rev. Online Companion, 2009, pp. 1-22.

Hwang, M., (2014), The DIFC Courts Judgment-Arbitration Protocol referral of Judgment Payment Disputes to Arbitration, Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021, from https://www.difccourts.ae/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/DIFC-Courts-CJ-Lecture-Notes2.docx

Hwang, M., (2015), "Commercial Courts and Commercial Arbitration - Competitors or partners", Arbitration International Vol.31, 2015, pp. 193-202.

ICC's Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook for Judges (2011)

ICC's Guide to the Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention: A Handbook for Judges, (2011). Retrieved 17 Jun, 2021, from https://www.arbitration-icca.org/iccas-guide-interpretation-1958-new-york-convention

Law of Dubai International Centre, No.9 (2004), Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021 from https://www.difc.ae/files/4414/5735/7076/Dubai_Law_No_9_of_2004_-_English.pdf

Le Gal, J., Raynaud, I., (2017), The Success of the DIFC Courts: When Common Law makes its Way into a Civil Law Region, Int'l BUs. L.J. No.4, 2017, 289-304.

Paulsson, J., (1998). Enforcing Arbitral Awards Notwithstanding Local standard Annulments, 6 Asia Pac. L. Rev. 1, 1998, pp. 1-28.

Practice Direction No.2 from February 2015, Retrieved 15 Jun, 2021, from https://www.difccourts.ae/rules-decisions/practice-directions/difc-courts-practice-direction-no-2-2015-referral-judgment-payment-disputes-arbitration

Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (recast), Retrieved 17 Jun, 2021, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02012R1215-20150226

Tan, D., (2018). Enforcing national court judgments as arbitration awards under the New York convention, Arbitration International, Vol.34, 2018, pp. 415-443.

The Rules of the Dubai International Financial Centre Courts (2014), Retrieved 16 Jun, 2021, from http://www.wilberforce.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/PUBLICATION-Rules-of-the-DIFC-Courts-2014.pdf

Wheeless, E., (1993). Article V(1) of the New York Convention, Emory International Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, 1993, pp. 805-846.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP2101055T

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)