SELECTION OF FORKLIFT UNIT FOR TRANSPORT HANDLING USING INTEGRATED MCDM UNDER NEUTROSOPHIC ENVIRONMENT

Sayanta Chakraborty, Apu Kumar Saha

DOI Number
10.22190/FUME220620039C
First page
Last page

Abstract


In material handling, warehousing, manufacturing and construction applications, forklifts are vital equipment, which are used to engage, lift and move palletized items. So, selection of the most appropriate forklift is an essential task for transportation of materials in warehouses for optimal use of the equipment. The present treatise introduces a well-known multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique, namely fully consistent method (FUCOM) under neutrosophic environment (NE) to model and solve the problem of selecting the best forklift for warehouse. In this regard, the linguistic assessments of the criteria have been represented in terms of single valued triangular neutrosophic numbers (SVTNNs). A novel triangular neutrosphic score function and ranking function are also proposed. To calculate criteria weights, a novel SVTN linear programming problem (SVTNLPP) has been developed. The alternatives have been ranked through multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis (MOORA). The robustness, consistency and reliability of the proposed integrated method have been checked through comparative and sensitivity analyses. This study makes a significant contribution by developing an original integrated model which provides warehousing system managers a quantifiable analysis, based on which they may make future decisions in order to improve the overall efficiency of the organization in transport handling.

Keywords

Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Fully Consistent Method, Neutrosophic Set, Forklift, Warehouse, MOORA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberti, M., Ciurana, J., Rodríguez, C.A., Ozel, T., 2011, Design of a decision support system for machine tool selection based on machine characteristics and performance tests, J. Intell. Manuf., 22, pp. 263-277.

Saha, A. K., Choudhury, S., Majumder, M., 2017, Performance efficiency analysis of water treatment plants by using MCDM and neural network model, MATTER: International Journal of Science and Technology, 3(1), pp. 27-35.

Choudhury, S., Howladar, P., Majumder, M., Saha, A. K., 2019, Application of novel MCDM for location selection of surface water treatment plant, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(5), pp. 1865 – 1877.

Soni, A., Chakraborty, S., Das, P. K., Saha, A. K., 2022, Materials selection of reinforced sustainable composites by recycling waste plastics and agro-waste: an integrated multi-criteria decision making approach, Constr. Build. Mater, 348, 128608.

Choudhury, S., Saha, A. K., 2018, Prediction of operation efficiency of water treatment plant with the help of multi-criteria decision-making, Water Conservation Science and Engineering, 3(2), pp. 79-90.

Choudhury, S., Saha, A.K., Majumder, M., 2020, Optimal location selection for installation of surface water treatment plant by Gini coefficient-based analytical hierarchy process, Environ Dev Sustain, 22, pp. 4073–4099.

Saaty, T.L., 1996, Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process, Pittsburgh: RSW Publications.

Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S., 2018, A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Symmetry, 10(9), 393.

Badi, I., Kridish, M., 2020, Landfill site selection using a novel FUCOM-CODAS model: A case study in Libya, Scientific African, 9, e00537.

Yazdani, M., Chatterjee, P., Pamucar, D., Chakraborty, S., 2020, Development of an integrated decision making model for location selection of logistics centers in the Spanish autonomous communities, Expert Systems with Applications, 148, 113208.

Ramezanzade, M., Saebi, J., Karimi, H., Mostafaeipour A., 2020, A new hybrid decision-making framework to rank power supply systems for government organizations: A real case study, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 41, 100779.

Feizi, F., Karbalaei-Ramezanali, A.A., Farhadi, S., 2021, FUCOM-MOORA and FUCOM-MOOSRA: new MCDM-based knowledge-driven procedures for mineral potential mapping in green fields, SN Appl. Sci., 3(3), 358.

Ong, M.C., Leong, Y.T., Wan, Y.K., Chew, I.M.L., 2021, Multi-objective Optimization of Integrated Water System by FUCOM-VIKOR Approach, Process Integr Optim Sustain, 5, pp. 43–62.

Yousefi, S., Valipour, M., Gul M., 2021, Systems failure analysis using Z-number theory-based combined compromise solution and full consistency method, Applied Soft Computing, 113, 107902.

Das, M.C., Sarkar, B., 2021, Fusion between Full Consistency Method and Ideal Solutions with Constraint on Values for Material Selection: A Consilient Conspectus Approach, J. Inst. Eng. India Ser, C 102, pp. 1211-1230.

Durmić, E., Stević, Ž., Chatterjee, P., Vasiljević, M., Tomašević, M., 2020, Sustainable supplier selection using combined FUCOM – Rough SAW model, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), pp. 34-43.

Badi, I., Muhammad, L. J., Abubakar, M., Bakır. M, 2022, Measuring Sustainability Performance Indicators Using FUCOM-MARCOS Methods, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(2), pp. 99-116.

Chakraborty, S., Saha, A.K., 2022, A framework of LR fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for health care waste recycling technology, Appl. Soft Comput, 127, 109388.

Chakraborty, S., Saha, A. K., 2022, Selection of optimal lithium ion battery recycling process: A multi-criteria group decision making approach, Journal of Energy Storage, 55, Part B.

Petrović, G., Mihajlović, J., Ćojbašić, Z., Madić, M., Marinković, D., 2019, Comparison Of Three Fuzzy MCDM Methods For Solving The Supplier Selection Problem, Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering, 17(3), pp. 455-469.

Taha, Z., Rostam, S., 2011, A fuzzy AHP–ANN-based decision support system for machine tool selection in a flexible manufacturing cell, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 57, pp. 719-733.

Ayağ, Z., Özdemir, R.G., 2012, Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP, International Journal of Production Economics, 140(2), pp. 630-636.

Li, H., Wang, W., Fan, L., Li, Q., Chen, X., 2020, A novel hybrid MCDM model for machine tool selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, entropy weighting and later defuzzification VIKOR, Applied Soft Computing, 91, 106207

Ashraf, A., Ullah, K., Hussain, A., Bari, M., 2022, Interval-Valued Picture Fuzzy Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operator with application in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 3(1), pp. 301-317.

Riaz, M., Athar Farid, H. M., 2022, Picture fuzzy aggregation approach with application to third-party logistic provider selection process, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 3(1), pp. 318-327.

Sahu , R., Dash , S. R., Das, S., 2021, Career selection of students using hybridized distance measure based on picture fuzzy set and rough set theory, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), pp. 104-126.

Kazemitash, N., Fazlollahtabar, H., Abbaspour, M., 2021, Rough Best-Worst Method for Supplier Selection in Biofuel Companies based on Green criteria, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 4(2), pp. 1-12.

Sharma, H. K., Singh, A., Yadav, D., Kar, S., 2022, Criteria selection and decision making of hotels using Dominance Based Rough Set Theory, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(1), pp. 41-55.

Atanassov, K.T., 1986, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20(1), pp. 87-96.

Smarandache, F., 1998, Neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set, and logic: analytic synthesis & synthetic analysis, Rehoboth: American Research Press.

Karamaşa, Ç., Demir, E., Memiş, S., Korucuk, S., 2021, Weighting the factors affecting logistics outsourcing. Decision Making, Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), pp. 19-32.

Yazdani, M., Torkayesh, A.E., Stević, Z., Chatterjee, P., Ahari, S.A., Hernandez, V.D., 2021, An interval valued neutrosophic decision-making structure for sustainable supplier selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 183, 115354.

Roknić, S., Nikoličić, S., Ostojić, G., Škrinjar, D., 2006, Application of information technologies for improvement of logistic parameters of warehouses, XVIII International Conference on “Material Handling, Constructions and Logistics”, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, C, pp. 217-222.

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/03/07/1749546/0/en/World-Forklift-Market-2013-2018-2019-2023-Analysis-by-Class-Type-Fuel-Type-Application-Type-Company-and-Region.html (last accessed: 10.12.2020).

Zajac, P., Rozic, T., 2022, Energy consumption of forklift versus standards, effects of their use and expectations, Energy, 239(D), 122187.

Mešić, A., Miškić, S., Stević, Ž., Mastilo, Z., 2022. Hybrid MCDM Solutions for Evaluation of the Logistics Performance Index of the Western Balkan Countries, Economics, 10(1), pp. 13-34.

Ombale, A.V., More, N.N., Shinde, G.S., Mahadik, V., Deshmukh, G.P., 2019, Design, Manufacturing & Analysis of Human Powered Forklift, IJARIIE, 5(3), pp. 1427-1433.

Raut, S. B., Gawade, K. D., Mane, V. N., More, S. N., Suryavanshi, A.V., 2020, Design of Electric Forklift used in Small industrial Warehouses and Workshops, International Journal Of Engineering Research & Technology, 9(4), doi: 10.17577/IJERTV9IS040673.

Cheng, L., Zhao, D., Li, T., Wang,Y., 2022, Modelling and simulation analysis of electric forklift energy prediction management, Energy Reports, 8(6), pp. 353-365.

Conte, M., Genovese, A., Ortenzi, F., Vellucci, F., 2014, Hybrid battery-supercapacitor storage for an electric forklift: a life-cycle cost assessment, J Appl Electrochem, 44, pp. 523–532.

Ortiz-Barrios, M., Cabarcas-Reyes, J., Ishizaka, A., Barbati, M., Jaramillo-Rueda, N., Carrascal-Zambrano, G., 2021, A hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for selecting a sustainable supplier of forklift filters: a case study from the mining industry, Ann Oper Res, 307, pp. 443–481.

Atanasković, P., Gajić, V., Dadić, I., Nikoličić, S., 2013, Selection of Forklift Unit for Warehouse Operation by Applying Multi-Criteria Analysis, Promet, 25(4), pp. 379-86.

Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G., 2015, The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), pp. 3016-3028.

Průša, P., Jovčić, S., Němec, V., Mrázek. P., 2018, Forklift Truck Selection Using TOPSIS Method, IJTTE.

Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbašić, A., Stević, Ž., 2019, FUCOM method in group decision-making: Selection of forklift in a warehouse, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), pp. 49-65.

Mahmutagić, E., Stevic, Z., Nunic, Z., Chatterjee, P., Tanackov, I., 2021, An Integrated Decision-Making Model for Efficiency Analysis of The Forklifts In Warehousing Systems, Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), pp. 537-553.

Huskanović, E., Stević, Z., 2022, Forklift Selection Using An Integrated Criticmarcos Model, 5th Logistics International Conference, Belgrade, Serbia.

Wang, H., Smarandache, F., Zhang, Y.Q., Sunderraman, R., 2010, Single valued neutrosophic sets, Multi space and Multi structure, 4, pp. 410-413.

Brauers, W.K., Zavadskas, E.K., 2006, The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy, Control Cybern, 35, pp. 445-469.

Brauers, W., Zavadskas, E., Peldschus, F., Turskis, Z., 2008, Multi-objective decision-making for road design,Transport, 23, pp. 183-193.

Petrović, G.S., Madić, M., Antucheviciene, J., 2018, An approach for robust decision making rule generation: Solving transport and logistics decision making problems, Expert Systems with Applications, 106, pp. 263-276.

Das, M.C., Sarkar, B., Ray, S., 2012, Decision making under conflicting environment: a new MCDM method, International Journal Applied Decision Sciences, 5, pp. 142-162.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0354-2025 (Print)

ISSN: 2335-0164 (Online)

COBISS.SR-ID 98732551

ZDB-ID: 2766459-4