APPLICATION OF THE DIBR II – ROUGH MABAC DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR RANKING METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF LEAN ORGANIZATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT IN THE PROCESS OF TECHNICAL MAINTENANCE

Darko Božanić, Igor Epler, Adis Puška, Sanjib Biswas, Dragan Marinković, Stefan Koprivica

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME230614026B
First page
101
Last page
123

Abstract


This paper presents a multi-criteria decision-making model based on the application of two methods, DIBR II and MABAC. The DIBR II method was used to define weight coefficients. The MABAC method was used to rank alternatives, and it was applied in a rough environment. Four experts were engaged in defining the criteria and alternatives as well as in the relation of criteria. The model was applied for ranking the methods and techniques of Lean organization systems management in the maintenance of technical systems of special purposes. At the end of the application was conducted a sensitivity analysis which proved the stability of the obtained results.

Keywords

Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria II (DIBR II), Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), Rough number, Lean concept

Full Text:

PDF

References


Epler, I.J., 2013, Models of technical system maintenance management, Military technical courier, 61(1), pp. 178-195.

Wireman, T., 2004, Benchmarking BEST Practices in Maintenance Management, Industrial Press, New York.

Epler, I.J., Božičković, R.C., Arsić, S.N., Dinić, J.B., 2016, Real improvement processes in the army based on the lean six sigma concept, Military technical courier, 64(4), pp. 1132-1156.

Božičković, R., 2005, Lean koncept u efektivnim proizvodnim sistemima, PhD Thesis, University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Marić, B., 2010, Model upravljanja proizvodnim procesom u remontno – proizvodnim sistemima na bazi Lean koncepta, PhD Thesis, University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Womack, J., Jones, D., Roos, D., 1991, The Machine that Change the World, Free Press, New York.

Womack, J., Jones, D., 1996, Lean Thinking, Free Press, New York.

Epler, I., 2017, Lean koncept u održavanju tehničkih sistema specijalne namene, PhD Thesis, University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering East Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Srinivasan, M.M., Bowers, M.R., Gilbert, K., 2014, Lean maintenance Repair on Overhaul, Mc Graw Hill Education.

Tamanna, S., Rahman, M.M., 2022, Prioritization of Effective Lean Tools for Reliability Analysis & Maintenance Strategy, Journal of Engineering Advancements, 3(3), pp. 112-130.

Singha Mahapatra, M., Shenoy, D., 2022, Lean maintenance index: a measure of leanness in maintenance organizations, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 28(4), pp. 791-809.

Bhebhe, M., Zincume. P.N., 2022, Application of Lean principles in railway maintenance, Proc. 33rd Annual Southern African Institute for Industrial Engineering Conference (SAIIE33), The Capital, Zimbali, South Africa, pp. 1134-1148.

Korchagin, A., Deniskin, Y., Pocebneva, I., Vasilyeva, O., 2022, Lean Maintenance 4.0: implementation for aviation industry, Transportation Research Procedia, 63, pp. 1521-1533.

Dragone, I.S., Biotto, C.N., Serra, S.M.B., 2021, Evaluation of Lean Principles in Building Maintenance Management, Proc. 29th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), 13-22, Lima, Peru.

Puška, A., Maksimović, A., Stojanović, I., 2018, Improving organizational learning by sharing information through innovative supply chain in agro-food companies from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 1(1), pp. 76-90.

Riaz, M., Athar Farid, H.M., 2022, Picture fuzzy aggregation approach with application to third-party logistic provider selection process, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 3(1), pp. 227–236.

Bošković, S., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Jovčić, S., Zanne, M., 2023, An Extended AROMAN Method for Cargo Bike Delivery Concept Selection, Decision Making Advances, 1(1), pp. 1–9.

Ali, A., Ullah, K., Hussain, A., 2023, An approach to multi-attribute decision-making based on intuitionistic fuzzy soft information and Aczel-Alsina operational laws, Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), pp. 80–89.

Mahmood, T., ur Rehman, U., 2023, Bipolar complex fuzzy subalgebras and ideals of BCK/BCI-algebras, Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), pp. 47–61.

Ashraf, A., Ullah, K., Hussain, A., Bari, M., 2022, Interval-Valued Picture Fuzzy Maclaurin Symmetric Mean Operator with application in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 3(1), pp. 210–226.

Maurya, J.K., Mishra, S.K., 2022, Strong Complementary Approximate Karush-Kuhn-Tucker Conditions for Multiobjective Optimization Problems, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 32(2), pp. 219-234.

Badi, I., Stević, Ž., Bayane Bouraima, M., 2023, Overcoming Obstacles to Renewable Energy Development in Libya: An MCDM Approach towards Effective Strategy Formulation. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), pp. 17–24.

Božanić, D., Pamucar, D., 2023, Overview of the Method Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked Criteria II and Its Application in Multi-criteria Decision-Making. In: Chatterjee, P., Pamucar, D., Yazdani, M., Panchal, D. (Eds.) Computational Intelligence for Engineering and Management Applications. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 984, Springer, Singapore. pp. 863-873.

Badi, I., Abdulshahed, A., 2021, Sustainability performance measurement for Libyan Iron and Steel Company using Rough AHP, Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 1(1), pp. 22–34.

Roy, J., Adhikary, K., Kar, S., Pamucar, D., 2018, A rough strength relational DEMATEL model for analysing the key success factors of hospital service quality, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(1), pp. 121-142.

Qi, J., Hu, J., Peng, J.-H., 2020, Integrated rough VIKOR for customer-involved design concept evaluation combining with customers’ preferences and designers’ perceptions, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 46, 101138.

Song, W., Ming, X., Wu, Y., Zhu, B., 2014, A rough TOPSIS Approach for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis in Uncertain Environments, Quality and Reliability Engineering, 30(4), pp. 473-486.

Arsić, S.N., Pamučar, D., Suknović, M., Janošević, M., 2019, Menu evaluation based on rough MAIRCA and BW methods, Serbian Journal of Management, 14(1), pp. 27-48.

Jangid, V., Kumar, G.A., 2022, Novel Technique for Solving Two-Person Zero-Sum Matrix Games in a Rough Fuzzy Environment, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 32(2), pp. 251-278.

Pamucar, D., Žižović, M., Đuričić, D., 2022, Modification of the CRITIC method using fuzzy rough numbers, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(2), pp. 362–371.

Sahu, R., Dash, S.R., Das, S., 2021, Career selection of students using hybridized distance measure based on picture fuzzy set and rough set theory, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(1), 104–126.

Chakraborty, S., Dandge, S.S., Agarwal, S., 2020, Non-traditional machining processes selection and evaluation: A rough multi-attributive border approximation area comparison approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106201.

Tešić, D., Radovanović, M., Božanić, D., Pamucar, D., Milić, A., Puška, A., 2022, Modification of the DIBR and MABAC Methods by Applying Rough Numbers and Its Application in Making Decisions, Information, 13(8), p. 353.

Tešić, D.Z., Božanić, D.I., Miljković, B.D., 2023, Application of MCDM DIBR-Rough MABAC Model for Selection of Drone for Use in Natural Disaster Caused by Flood. In: Filipovic, N. (eds) Applied Artificial Intelligence: Medicine, Biology, Chemistry, Financial, Games, Engineering. AAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 659, Springer, Cham, pp. 151-169.

Roy, J., Chatterjee, K., Bandhopadhyay, A., Kar, S. (2018). Evaluation and selection of Medical Tourism sites: A rough Analytic Hierarchy Process based Multi Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison approach, Expert Systems, 35(1), e12232.

Chattopadhyay, R., Das, P.P., Chakraborty, S., 2022, Development of a Rough-MABAC-DoE-based Metamodel for Supplier Selection in an Iron and Steel Industry, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 5(1), pp. 20–40.

Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G., 2015, The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), pp. 3016-3028.

Pawlak, Z., 1991, Rough sets-theoretical aspects of reasoning about data; Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.

Pawlak, Z., 1996, Rough sets, rough relations and rough functions, Fundamenta Informaticae, 27(2-3), pp. 103-108.

Zhai, L.-Y., Khoo, L.-P., Zhong, Z.-W., 2009, A rough set based QFD approach to the management of imprecise design information in product development, Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23(2), pp. 222–228.

Čubranić-Dobrodolac, M., Švadlenka, L., Čičević, S., Trifunović, A., Dobrodolac, M., 2020, Using the Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Inference Systems to Compare the Impact of Speed and Space Perception on the Occurrence of Road Traffic Accidents, Mathematics, 8(9), 1548.

Tešić, D.Z., Božanić, D.I., Pamučar, D.S., Din, J., 2022, DIBR - Fuzzy MARCOS model for selecting a location for a heavy mechanized bridge, Military technical courier, 70(2), pp. 314-339.

Ulutaş, A., Topal, A., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., 2022, A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods, Sustainability, 14(24), 16921.

Radovanović, M., Petrovski, A., Žnidaršič, V., Ranđelović, A., 2021, Application of the Fuzzy AHP -VIKOR Hybrid Model in the Selection of an Unmanned Aircraft for the Needs of Tactical Units of the Armed Forces, Scientific Technical Review, 71(2), pp. 26-35.

Radovanović, M., Milić, A., Petrovski, A., 2021, Analysis of accuracy and precision of shooting with home: Made automatic rifles using the AHP method, Scientific Technical Review, 71(1), pp. 30-37.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME230614026B

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0354-2025 (Print)

ISSN: 2335-0164 (Online)

COBISS.SR-ID 98732551

ZDB-ID: 2766459-4