ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF THE CURVED PROFILE MEASUREMENT WITH CMM: A CASE STUDY

Tomasz Mazur, Miroslaw Rucki, Yuriy Gutsalenko

DOI Number
10.22190/FUME210507063M
First page
Last page

Abstract


In the paper, analysis of the curved profile measurement accuracy is described. Since there was no CAD model or other reference profile for the measured detail, the first step was to generate the reference contour of the cam using the technical drawing and tolerance requirements. The test campaign consisted of three experiments aimed at determining the effect of scanning velocity on the results of form deviation δ measurement, evaluation of deviation δ measurement uncertainty and the measurement repeatability. The scanning time was checked, too. The obtained results demonstrated feasibility of the chosen CMM and measurement strategy. It was found also that the measurement uncertainty did not depend on the scanning sampling step from 0.05 to 0.2 mm, and the true measurement time was for 30-40% longer than that expected from the nominal scanning velocity.

Keywords

Curved Profile, Tolerance, Measurement, CMM, Uncertainty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bo, P., Bartoň, M., 2019, On initialization of milling paths for 5-axis flank CNC machining of free-form surfaces with general milling tools, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 71, pp 30-42.

Vosniakos, G., Pipinis, G., Kostazos, P., 2021, Numerical simulation of single point incremental forming for asymmetric parts, Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering, doi: 10.22190/FUME201210046V.

Jiang, X. J., Scott, P. J., 2020, Chapter 10 - Characterization of free-form surfaces, in: X.J. Jiang, P.J. Scott (Eds.), Advanced Metrology, Academic Press, pp. 247-280.

Fleischer, J., Munzinger, C., Lanza, G., Ruch, D., 2009, Position and contour detection of spatially curved profiles on the basis of a component-specific scale, CIRP Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 58(1), pp. 481-484.

Weckenmann, A., Knauer, M., 1998, The influence of measurement strategy on the uncertainty of CMM-measurements, Annals of the ClRP, 47(7), pp. 451-454.

Poniatowska, M., 2012, Deviation model based method of planning accuracy inspection of free-form surfaces using CMMs, Measurement, 45(5), pp 927-937.

Xiong, Y.L., 1990, Computer aided measurement of profile error of complex surfaces and curves: Theory and algorithm, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 30(3), pp. 339-357.

Lou, S., Brown, S.B., Sun, W., Zeng, W., Jiang, X., Scott, P.J., 2019, An investigation of the mechanical filtering effect of tactile CMM in the measurement of additively manufactured parts, Measurement, 144, pp. 173-182.

Menq, C., Chen, F.L., 1996, Curve And Surface Approximation From CMM Measurement Data, Computers ind. Engng, 30(2), pp. 211-225.

Lin, H., Keller, F., Stein, M., 2020, Influence and compensation of CMM geometric errors on 3D gear measurements, Measurement, 151, Article 107110.

Ding, D., Zhao, Z., Zhang, X., Fu, Y., Xu, J., 2020, Evaluation and compensation of laser-based on-machine measurement for inclined and curved profiles, Measurement, 151, Article 107236.

Adam Wozniak, A., Krajewski, G., Byszewski, M., 2019, A new method for examining the dynamic performance of coordinate measuring machines, Measurement, 134, pp. 814-819.

Zhang Y., Chen, Z., Zhu, Z., Wang, X., 2020, A sampling method for blade measurement based on statistical analysis of profile deviations, Measurement, 163, Article 107949.

Dhanish, P.B., Mathew, J., 2006, Effect of CMM point coordinate uncertainty on uncertainties in determination of circular features, Measurement, 39(6), pp. 522-531.

Kubátová, D., Melichar, M., Kutlwašer, J., 2017, Evaluation of Repeatability and reproducibility of CMM equipment, Procedia Manufacturing, 13, pp. 558-564.

Raja, J., Muralikrishnan, B., Fu, S., 2002, Recent advances in separation of roughness, waviness and form, Precision Engineering, 26(2), pp. 222-235.

Raghu, S., Mamatha, T.G., Pali, H.S., Sharma, R., Vimal, J.R., Kumar V., 2020, A comparative study of circularity of artefact detecting circle using CMM and form tester with different filters, Materials Today: Proceedings, 25(4), pp. 821-826.

Kalish, N. J., Davidson, J. K., Shah, J.J., 2020, Constructive statistics and virtual capture zones: A novel math model for CMM metrology, Procedia CIRP, 92, pp. 39-44.

He, G., Sang, Y., Wang, H., Sun, G., 2019, A profile error evaluation method for freeform surface measured by sweep scanning on CMM, Precision Engineering, 56, pp. 280-292.

Gąska, A., Harmatys, W., Gąska, P., Gruza, M., Gromczak, K., Ostrowska, K., 2017, Virtual CMM-based model for uncertainty estimation of coordinate measurements performed in industrial conditions, Measurement, 98, pp. 361-371.

Zhou, Z., Zhang, Y., Tang, K., 2016, Sweep scan path planning for efficient freeform surface inspection on five-axis CMM, Computer-Aided Design, 77, pp. 1-17.

Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. (2013) consistency, n. OED Online. Retrieved December 17, 2013, from http://www.oed.com

Saunders, P., Wilson, A., Orchard, N., Tatman, N., Maropoulos, P., 2014, An Exploration into Measurement Consistency on Coordinate Measuring Machines, Procedia CIRP, Volume 25, pp. 19-26.

EN ISO 1101:2017: Geometrical product specifications (GPS).

Qiu, H., Li, Y., Cheng, K., Li, Y., 2000, A practical evaluation approach towards form deviation for two-dimensional contours based on coordinate measurement data, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 40, pp. 259–275.

Fan, J., Ma, L., Sun, A., Zou, Zh., 2020, An approach for extracting curve profiles based on scanned point cloud, Measurement, 149, Article 107023.

CRYSTA-APEX S SERIES, Bulletin No. 2173, Mitutoyo, https://www.mitutoyo.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2097_CRYSTA_ApexS.pdf (Accessed on December, 7, 2020).

Gapinski, B., Grzelka, M., Rucki, M., 2006, The roundness deviation measurement with coordinate measuring machines, Engineering Review, 26(1-2), pp. 1-6.

Gapinski, B., Rucki, M., 2008, The roundness deviation measurement with CMM, 2008 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Methods for Uncertainty Estimation in Measurement, pp. 108-111, doi: 10.1109/AMUEM.2008.4589944

JCGM 100:2008. Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement.

Jezierski, J., Kowalik, M., Siemiatkowski, Z., Warowny, R., 2010, Tolerance analysis in the mechanical engineering, WNT, Warszawa (in Polish).

Messinis, S., Vosniakos, G.C., 2020, An agent-based flexible manufacturing system controller with Petri-net enabled algebraic deadlock avoidance, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), pp. 77-92.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0354-2025 (Print)

ISSN: 2335-0164 (Online)

COBISS.SR-ID 98732551

ZDB-ID: 2766459-4