EVIDENCE-BASED STROKE REHABILITATION

Ivona D. Stanković, Anita Stanković, Marija Spalević, Dragan Zlatanović, Tamara Stanković

DOI Number
10.22190/FUMB161003003S
First page
57
Last page
63

Abstract


Stroke can have different clinical characteristics and consequences, with unequal disability and outcome, thus demanding individual approach, specific skills and general knowledge. Treatment of stroke has significantly improved during the last twenty years, mainly because of clinical and experimental studies, adequate medicamentous therapy, and the use of new technologies as well. Use-dependent rehabilitation strategy includes repetitive training with proper adjustment of the program. Other rehabilitation practices should also be incorporated, such as self-care, recreation, and home-based activities. Motivation of the patients, improving quality of life, functional independence, activities of daily life are crucial. Holistic approach means that the patient as a whole should be considered and treated. Scientific evidence is sufficient to confirm the necessity of physical rehabilitation of patients after stroke in order to achieve the optimal results. Current evidence on the effect of physical therapy in stroke rehabilitation is presented.


Keywords

stroke, physical therapy, rehabilitation, evidence

Full Text:

PDF

References


de Oliveira Manoel AL, Goffi A, et al. The critical care management of spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage: a contemporary review. Crit Care 2016 18;20:272. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1432-0.

Heron N, Kee F, Donnelly M, Cupples ME. Systematic review of rehabilitation programmes initiated within 90 days of a transient ischaemic attack or 'minor' stroke: a protocol. BMJ Open 2015;5(6):e007849. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007849

Hankey GJ. Stroke. Lancet 2016. pii: S0140-6736(16)30962-X. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30962-X.

Peisker T, Koznar B, Stetkarova I, Widimsky P. Acute stroke therapy: A review. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2016. pii: S1050-1738(16)30086-X. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2016.06.009.

Prabhakaran S, Ruff I, Bernstein RA. Acute stroke intervention: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015; 313(14):1451-1462. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.3058.

Chan B. Effect of increased intensity of physiotherapy on patient outcomes after stroke: an economic literature review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2015; 15(7):1-43.

Kramer S, Johnson L, Bernhardt J, Cumming T. Energy expenditure and cost during walking after stroke: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97(4):619-32. e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.007.

Kristensen OH, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Muscle strength and poststroke hemiplegia: a systematic review of muscle strength assessment and muscle strength impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98(2):368-380. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.023.

Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, Langhorne P, Mead GE, Mehrholz J, van Wijck F. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (11):CD010820. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD010820.pub2.

Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3:CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD009645.pub3.

das Nair R, Cogger H, Worthington E, Lincoln NB. Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 9:CD002293.

Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/¬14651858.CD000425.pub4

Kessner SS, Bingel U, Thomalla G. Somatosensory deficits after stroke: a scoping review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2016; 23(2):136-146. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2015.1116822.

Feigin VL, Norrving B, George MG, Foltz JL, Roth GA, Mensah GA. Prevention of stroke: a strategic global imperative. Nat Rev Neurol 2016; 12(9):501-512. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.107.

Jellema S, van der Sande R, van Hees S, Zajec J, Steultjens EM, Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Role of environmental factors on resuming valued activities poststroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97(6):991-1002.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.015

Lawton M, Haddock G, Conroy P, Sage K. Therapeutic alliances in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-ethnography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97(11):1979-1993. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.031.

Harvey RL. Predictors of functional outcome following stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2015; 26(4):583-598. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.07.002.

Mees M, Klein J, Yperzeele L, Vanacker P, Cras P. Predicting discharge destination after stroke: A systematic review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 142:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro. 2016.01.004.

Sauzet O, Kleine M, Menzel-Begemann A, Exner AK. Longitudinal randomised controlled trials in rehabilitation post-stroke: a systematic review on the quality of reporting and use of baseline outcome values. BMC Neurol 2015; 15: 99. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0344-y.

Ehrensberger M, Simpson D, Broderick P, Monaghan K. Cross-education of strength has a positive impact on post stroke rehabilitation: a systematic literature review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2016; 23(2):126-135. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2015.1112062

Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, Bennett L, Bernhardt J. Stroke Survivors' experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015; 96(9):1698-708.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.017.

Stinear CM. Stroke rehabilitation research needs to be different to make a difference. F1000Res 2016; 5. pii: F1000 Faculty Rev-1467. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8722.1.

Chen J, Jin W, Zhang XX, Xu W, Liu XN, Ren CC. Telerehabilitation approaches for stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015; 24(12):2660-2668. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis. 2015.09.014.

Parke HL, Epiphaniou E, Pearce G, Taylor SJ, Sheikh A, Griffiths CJ, et al. Self-Management support interventions for stroke survivors: a systematic meta-review. PLoS One 2015;10(7):e0131448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131448.

Clarke DJ, Forster A. Improving post-stroke recovery: the role of the multidisciplinary health care team. J Multidiscip Healthc 2015; 8:433-442. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S68764.

Bank J, Charles K, Morgan P. What is the effect of additional physiotherapy on sitting balance following stroke compared to standard physiotherapy treatment: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016; 23(1):15-25. doi: 10.1179/1945511915Y.0000000005.

Sehatzadeh S. effect of increased intensity of physiotherapy on patient outcomes after stroke: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser 2015; 15(6):1-42

Bernhardt J, English C, Johnson L, Cumming TB. Early mobilization after stroke: early adoption but limited evidence. Stroke 2015; 46(4):1141-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007434.

Everink IH, van Haastregt JC, van Hoof SJ, Schols JM, Kempen GI. Factors influencing home discharge after inpatient rehabilitation of older patients: a systematicreview. BMC Geriatr 2016; 16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0187-4.

Pin-Barre C, Laurin J. Physical Exercise as a diagnostic, rehabilitation, and preventive tool: influence on neuroplasticity and motor recovery after stroke. Neural Plast 2015;2015:608581. doi: 10.1155/2015/608581.

Saunders DH, Sanderson M, Hayes S, et al. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3:CD003316. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003316.pub6.

Ammann BC, Knols RH, Baschung P, de Bie RA, de Bruin ED. Application of principles of exercise training in sub-acute and chronic stroke survivors: a systematic review. BMC Neurol 2014; 14:167. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0167-2

Gomes-Neto M, Saquetto MB, Silva CM, Carvalho VO, Ribeiro N, Conceição C. Effects of respiratory muscle training on respiratory function, respiratory muscle strength, and exercise tolerance in patients poststroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016; 97(11):1994-2001. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.04.018.

Mohd Zulkifly MF, Ghazali SE, Che Din N, Ajit Singh DK, Subramaniam P. A review of risk factors for cognitive impairment in stroke survivors. ScientificWorldJournal. 2016; 2016:3456943. doi: 10.1155/2016/ 3456943.

Constans A, Pin-Barre C, Temprado JJ, Decherchi P, Laurin J. Influence of aerobic training and combinations of interventions on cognition and neuroplasticity after stroke. Front Aging Neurosci 2016;8:164. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00164.

Tiozzo E, Youbi M, Dave K, Perez-Pinzon M, Rundek T, Sacco RL, et al.Aaerobic, resistance, and cognitive exercise training poststroke. Stroke 2015; 46(7):2012-2016. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006649.

Austin MW, Ploughman M, Glynn L, Corbett D. Aerobic exercise effects on neuroprotection and brain repair following stroke: a systematic reviewand perspective. Neurosci Res 2014; 87:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.06.007.

Kendall BJ, Gothe NP. Effect of aerobic exercise interventions on mobility among stroke patients: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 95(3):214-224. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000416

Pearce G, Pinnock H, Epiphaniou E, Parke HL, Heavey E, Griffiths CJ, et al. Experiences of self-management support following a stroke: a meta-review of qualitative systematic reviews. PLoS One 2015; 10(12):e0141803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141803

Louie DR, Eng JJ. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2016; 13(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0162-5.

Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, van Wegen EE, Meskers CG, Kwakkel G. Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2017; 31(2):107-121. doi: 10.1177/1545968316666957.

Luque-Moreno C, Ferragut-Garcías A, Rodríguez-Blanco C, Heredia-Rizo AM1, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca J, Kiper P, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca Á. A decade of progress using virtual reality for poststroke lower extremity rehabilitation: systematic review of the intervention methods. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:342529. doi: 10.1155/2015/342529.

Teo WP, Muthalib M, Yamin S, Hendy AM, Bramstedt K, Kotsopoulos E, Perrey S, Ayaz H. Does a combination of virtual reality, neuromodulation and neuroimaging provide a comprehensive platform for neurorehabilitation? - A narrative review of the literature. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10:284. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00284.

Laver K, George S, Thomas S, Deutsch JE, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation: an abridged version of a Cochrane review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2015; 51(4):497-506.

Darekar A, McFadyen BJ, Lamontagne A, Fung J. Efficacy of virtual reality-based intervention on balance and mobility disorders post-stroke: a scoping review. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2015; 12:46. doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0035-3.

Xu Y, Hou QH, Russell SD, Bennett BC, Sellers AJ, Lin Q, Huang DF. Neuroplasticity in post-stroke gait recovery and noninvasive brain stimulation. Neural Regen Res 2015; 10(12):2072-2080. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.172329.

Peters HT, Edwards DJ, Wortman-Jutt S, Page SJ. Moving forward by stimulating the brain: transcranial direct current stimulation in post-strokehemiparesis. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10:394. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00394.

Ebajemito JK, Furlan L, Nissen C, Sterr A. application of transcranial direct current stimulation in neurorehabilitation: the modulatory effect of sleep. Front Neurol 2016;7:54. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00054.

Smith MC, Stinear CM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in stroke: Ready for clinical practice? J Clin Neurosci 2016;31:10-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.01.034.

Peters HT, Page SJ. integrating mental practice with task-specific training and behavioral supports in poststroke rehabilitation: evidence, components, and augmentative opportunities. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2015; 26(4):715-727. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.06.004.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUMB161003003S

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© University of Niš, Serbia
Creative Commons licence CC BY-NC-ND
ISSN 0354-4699 (Print)
ISSN 2406-050X (Online)