THE EFFECT OF REMIFENTANIL ON INTUBATION CONDITIONS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CAESAREAN DELIVERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA: COMPARISON OF TWO DOSING REGIMENS

Marija Kutlešić, Ranko Kutlešić, Tatjana Ilić-Mostić, Danka Mostić Stanišić

DOI Number
10.22190/FUMB180602005K
First page
070
Last page
075

Abstract


The objective of our study was to compare the effects of two remifentanil dosing regimens, used during induction-delivery period of cesarean section, and of remifentanil-free control on maternal intubating conditions and hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation as well as on neonatal outcome. Seventy seven ASA physical status I-II women with singleton term pregnancy, who were scheduled for elective cesarean section in general anesthesia and have given written informed consent, were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled study and divided in three groups: A - 31 patient received 1 µg/kg remifentanil bolus before the induction of anesthesia, followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min remifentanil infusion that was stopped after the skin incision; B - 27 patients received only 1 µg/kg remifentanil bolus; C - 19 patients did not receive remifentanil until the delivery of the baby. Intubating conditions were qualified as excellent, good or poor. Group A had significantly higher number of patients with excellent intubating conditions (p = 0.011); majority of patients with good intubating conditions were in group C (p = 0.017). Systolic, diastolic, main arterial pressure and heart rate raised significantly in group C compared to A and B (p < 0.001). Neonatal outcome did not differ between groups – all neonates were vital with first minute Apgar scores ≥ 8. In conclusion, our dosing regimen of remifentanil 1µg/kg bolus given immediately before the induction followed by 0.15 µg/kg/min interrupted after skin incision provided the best compromise between the achievement of excellent intubating conditions, attenuation of maternal hemodynamic stress response to endotracheal intubation and avoidance of neonatal respiratory depression.


Keywords

anesthesia, obstetrical, endotracheal intubation, remifentanil.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Rollins M, Lucero J. Overview of anesthetic considerations for Caesarean delivery. Br Med Bull 2012; 101:105–125.

Littleford J. Effects on the fetus and newborn of maternal analgesia and anesthesia: a review. Can J Anesth 2004; 51:586–609.

Mostić-Ilić T, Petronijević M, Antonijević V, Ivanković Ž, Mostić D, Kendrišić M. General anesthesia and uteroplacental drug transfer. Serbian J Anesth Intensive Therapy 2013; 35:381–5. http://www.uais.rs/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/SJAITvol-35-7-8.pdf.

Khan MF, Samad K, Shamim F, Ullah H. Awareness during anesthesia—an update. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 2008; 19:723–735.

Paech MJ, Scott KL, Clavisi O, Chua S, McDonnell N. A prospective study of awareness and recall associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth 2009; 17:298–303.

Dünges B, Heid F, Dauster M, Strecker U, Röhrig B, Brambrink AM. Revisited: Haemodynamic instability and endocrine response during endotracheal tube-placement. A prospective, randomized trial using topical lidocaine and a lightwand. Open Anesthesiol J 2008; 2:30–39. doi:10.2174/1874321800802010030.

Hagberg C, Georgi R, Krier C. Complications of managing the airway. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19:641-659.

Lin SY, Hu CJ, Lin HC. Increased risk of stroke in patients who undergo cesarean section delivery: a nationwide population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 98:e1–7.

Jadon A. Complications of regional and general anaesthesia in obstetrics practice. Indian J Anest. 2010; 54:415–420.

Brown JPR. Recent developments in anaesthesia for caesarean section in the UK. Update Anaesth 2008; 23:3–7.

Kutlesic MS, Kutlesic RM, Mostic-Ilic T. Attenuation of cardiovascular stress response to endotracheal intubation by the use of remifentanil in patients undergoing caesarean delivery. J Anesth 2016; 30(2):274–283.

Khan FA, Ullah H. Pharmacological agents for preventing morbidity associated with the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 7:CD004087. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004087.pub2.

Hessen M, Klohr S, Hofmann T, Rossiant R, Devroe S, Straube S, Van de Velde M. Maternal and foetal effects of remifentanil for general anaesthesia in parturients undergouing caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 2013; 57:29–36.

Hill D. The use of remifentanil in obstetrics. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008; 26(1):169–182.

Yoo KY, Jeong CW, Park BY, Kim SJ, Jeong ST, Shin MH, Lee J. Effects of remifentanil on cardiovascular and bispectral index responses to endotracheal intubation in severe pre-eclamptic patients undergoing Caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102:812–819. doi:10.1093/bja/aep099

Egan TD, Kern SE, Muir KT, White J. Remifentanil by bolus injection: a safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and age effect investigation in human volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92:335–343.

Draisci G, Valente A, Suppa E, Frassanito L, Pinto R, Meo F, De Sole P, Bossù E, Zanfini BA. Remifentanil for cesarean section under general anesthesia: effects on maternal stress hormone secretion and neonatal well-being: a randomized trial. Int J Obstet Anesth 2008; 17:130–136. doi:10.1016/j.ijoa.2008.01.002.

Kee WDN, Kaw KS, Ma KC, Wong ASY, Lee BB, Floria F. Maternal and neonatal effects of remifentanil at induction of general anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:14–20.

Glass PSA, Gan TJ, Howell S. A review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Anesth Analg 1999; 89:S7–14.

Kan RE, Hughes SC, Rosen MA, Kessin C, Preston PG, Lobo EP. Intravenous remifentanil: placental transfer, maternal and neonatal effects. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:1467–1474.

Van de Velde M, Teunkens A, Kuypers M, Dewinter T, Vandermeersch E. General anaesthesia with target controlled infusion of propofol for planned caesarean section: maternal and neonatal effects of a remifentanil-based technique. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13:153–158.

Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Ericson LI et al. Good Clinical Research Practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anesth Scand 1996; 40:59–74.

Noskova P, Blaha J, Bakhouche H, Kubatova J, Ulrichova J, Marusicova P, Smisek J, Parizek A, Slanar O, Michalek P. Neonatal effect of remifentanil in general anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomized trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2015; 15:38. doi:10.1186/s12871-015-0020-1.

Eyigor C, Cagiran E, Balcioglu T, Uyar M. Comparison of the effects of remifentanil and remifentanil plus lidocaine on intubation conditions in intellectually disabled patients. Braz J Anesthesiol 2014; 64(4):263–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.03.006

Jeon YT, Oh AY, Park SH, Hwang JW, Park HP. Optimal remifentanil dose for lightwand intubation without muscle relaxants in healthy patients with thiopental coadministration: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29(11):520–523.

Durmus M, Ender G, Kadir BA, Nurcin G, Erdogan O, Ersoy MO. Remifentanil with thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. Anesth Analg 2003; 96(5):1336–1339.

Erhan E, Ugur G, Gunusen I, Alper I, Oyzar B. Propofol- not thiopental or etomidate – with remifentanil provides adequate intubating conditions in the absence of neuromuscular blocade. Can J Anaesth 2003; 50(2):108–115.

Imani F, Alebouyeh MR, Amvari ZT, Faiz SHR.Use of remifentanil and alfentanil in endotracheal intubation: a comparative study. Anesth Pain Med 2011; 1(2):61–65.

Alexander R, Fardell S. Use of remifentanil for tracheal intubation for caesarean section in a patient with suxamethonium apnoea. Anaesthesia 2005; 60:1036–1038.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUMB180602005K

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-2017 (Print)

ISSN 2406-0526  (Online)