THE INFLUENCE OF THE SAGITTAL DENTOSKELETAL PATTERN ON THE VALUE OF THE SOFT TISSUE PROFILE ANGLES - A CEPHALOMETRIC STUDY

Tatjana Perović, Milena Blažej, Ivan Jovanović

DOI Number
http://doi.org/10.22190/FUMB190514011P
First page
048
Last page
052

Abstract


The aim of this study has been to establish the values of soft tissue profile angles in subjects with dentoskeletal Class I, Class II Division 1, Class II Division 2, and Class III pattern, in order to examine the influence of sagittal dentoskeletal relation on the value of angular profile parameters. This comparative cephalometric study included the examination and the analysis by lateral cephalograms to evaluate soft tissue profile angles for 120 adult Caucasian subjects (60 women and 60 men) from the mid Balkan region divided into four groups towards ANB angle and incisors inclination. The following angles were examined: angle of facial convexity, facial convexity angle for the lower face and the angle of total facial convexity. By investigating the influence of the sagittal dentoskeletal pattern on the value of facial convexity angles, significant differences have been established between subjects with Class I and Class II Division 1 and 2 for all examined angles (p<0.001; p=0.011), while the differences between Class I and Class III are only significant for the facial convexity angle and facial convexity angle for the lower face, while the differences in the overall facial convexity angle are not significant (p=0.067). There are significant differences between subjects for all examined angles except the total facial convexity angle between Class I and Class III.


Keywords

cephalometry, face, malocclusions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Frith C. Role of facial expressions in social interactions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009; 364:3453–3458.

Heppt WJ, Vent J. The facial profile in the context of facial aesthetics. Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31(5):421–430.

Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1970; 40(4):284–318.

Wen YF, Wong HM, Lin R, Yin G, McGrath C. Inter-ethnic/racial facial variations: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of photogrammetric studies. PLoS ONE 2015; 10(8):e0134525.

Anić-Milošević S, Lapter-Varga M, Šlaj M. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30(2):135–140.

Diomande M, Beugre JB, Koueita MKK, Vaysse F. Relationship between angular measurements and facial shape of young Ivorians with normal dental occlusion. Scientific World Journal 2018: 6395910

Al Taki A, Guidoum A. Facial profile preferences, self-awareness and perception among groups of people in the United Arab Emirates. J Orthod Sci 2014; 3(2):55–61.

Sundareswaran S, Ramakrishnan R. The Facial Aesthetic index: An additional tool for assessing treatment need. J Orthod Sci 2016; 5(2):57–63.

Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119(5):464–471.

Reis SAB, Abrão J, de Assis Claro CA, CapelozzaFilho L. Evaluation of the determinants of facial profile aesthetics. Dental Press J Orthod 2011; 16(1):57–67.

Dongieux J, Sassouni V. The contribution of mandibular positioned variation to facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1980;50(4):334–339.

Bittner C, Pancherz H. Facial morphology and malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990: 97(4):308–315.

Pandian KS, Krishnan S, Kumar SA. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults. Indian J Dent Res 2018; 29(2):137–343.

Neslihan SC. Comparisons of Soft Tissue Thickness Measurements in Adult Patients With Various Vertical Patterns. Meandros Med Dent J 2017; 18:120–129.

Altemus LA. Comparative integumental relationships. Angle Ortodontist 1963; 33(3):217–221.

Perović T, Blažej Z. Male and female characteristics of facial soft tissue thickness in different orthodontic malocclusions evaluated by cephalometric radiography. Med Sci Monit 2018;24:3415–3424.

Hamid S, Abuaffan A. Facial soft tissue thickness in a sample of Sudanese adults with different occlusions. Forensic Sci Int 2016; 1266:209–214.

Ramesh G, Nagarajappa R, Sreedhar G, Sumalatha MN. Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Forensic Facial Reconstruction: Is it enough if Norms Set? J Forensic Res 2015;6(5):1000299.

Somaiah S, Khan MU, Muddaiah S, Shetty B, Reddy G, Siddegowda R. Comparison of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns in Kodava population. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2017; 8(2):51–56.

Jabbar A, Zia A, Shaikh I, Channar K, Memon A, Jatoi N. Evaluation of soft tissue chin thickness in various skeletal malocclusions. Pakistan Orthodontic Journal 2016;8(1):62–66.

Tanić T, Blažej Z, Mitić V. [Soft tissue thickness of face profile conditioning by dento-skeletal anomalies.] Srp Arh Celok Lek 2011; 139(7–8):439–445. (Serbian, English abstract)

Obaidi HA, Abdul-Qadir MY. Facial soft tissue convexity changes. Al-Rafidain Dent J 2007; 7(1):88–95.

Prahl-Andersen B, Ligthelm-Bakker ASWMR, Wattel E, Nanda K. Adolescent growth changes in soft tissue profile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107(5):476–483.

Bishara SE, Jackobsen JR, Hession TJ, Treder JE. Soft tissue profile changes from 5–45 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1998; 114(6):698–706.

Godt A, Müller A, Kalwitzki M, Göz G. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes. Eur J Orthod 2007;29(6):648–53.

Fortes HN, Guimarães TC, Belo IM, Matta EN. Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19(2):66–75.

Uysal T, Baysal A, Yagci A, Sigler LM, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profiles of Turkish and European-American young adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34(3):296–301.

Reis SAB, Abrão J, CapelozzaFilho L, Claro CAA. [Estudocomparativo do perfil facial dos Padrões I, II e III portadores de selamento labial passive.] Rev Dental Press Ortod Ortop Facial 2006;11(4):36–45. (Portuguese, English abstract)

Reis SAB, Abrão J, CapelozzaFilho L, Claro CAA. [Análise facial numérica do perfil de brasileirosPadrão I.] Rev Dental Press Ortod Ortop Facial 2006; 11(6):24–34. (Portuguese, English abstract)

Czarnecki ST, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104(2):180–187.

Ioi H, Nakata S, Nakasima A, Counts A. Effect of facial convexity on antero-posterior lip positions of the most favored Japanese facial profiles. Angle Orthodontist 2005;75(3):326–332.

Fernández-Riveiro P, Smyth-Chamosa E, Suárez-Quintanilla D, Suárez-Cunqueiro M. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile. Eur J Orthod 2003; 25(4):393–399.

Auger TA, Turley PK. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1999; 14(1):7–18.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUMB190514011P

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-2017 (Print)

ISSN 2406-0526  (Online)