SELF-DECEPTION AS A WEIGHTLESS MASK

Elias L. Khalil

DOI Number
-
First page
1
Last page
11

Abstract


Self-deception cuts across the behavior of persons, organizations, and states. Self-deception amounts to wearing a weightless mask: While the wearer is unaware of it, spectators usually recognize it. As soon as the wearer becomes conscious of the weightless mask, self-deception ceases to exist. This gives rise to a paradox: How could it ever be possible for the person to succeed in hiding the weightless mask from his or her own conscious self? To solve the paradox, this paper proposes that self-deception involves “two structural choices”: 1) an agent identifies the optimal decision — but the agent may fail (as a result of temptation) to choose it, which gives rise to self-blame; 2) The agent under focus may choose to invent a misleader (a lie) to make the choice appear “as if” it were optimal in order to avoid self-blame. The quest for a blameless choice makes it possible for the person to succeed in hiding the weightless mask from the conscious self. Aside from solving the Self-Deception Paradox, the proposed two-structural choice theory sheds light on three kinds of self-deception: red herring, self-rationalization, and denial.


Keywords

rational choice, self-blame, temptations, image-management, just world hypothesis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akerlof, G.A. and W.T. Dickens. “The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance.” American Economic Review 72 (1982): 307–319.

Baron, J. Thinking and Deciding, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Bénabou, R. “Ideology.” Journal of the European Economic Association 6 (2008): 321–352.

Davidson, D. “Deception and Division.” In The Multiple Self, edited by Jon Elster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Davidson, D. “Who is Fooled?” In Self-Deception and Paradoxes of Rationality, edited by J. P. Dupuy. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 1998.

Dupuy, J.-P., ed. Self-Deception and Paradoxes of Rationality. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 1998.

Elster, Jon. The Multiple Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.

Fingarette, H. Self-deception, with a New Chapter. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000 (1969).

Freud, A. The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense, trans. by Cecil Baines, revised edition. New York: International Universities Press, 1966.

Fudenberg, D. and D. K. Levine. “A Dual-self Model of Impulse Control.” American Economic Review 96 (2006): 1449–1476.

Gilboa, I. Rational Choice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2010.

Hefferman, M. Willful Blindness: Why We Ignore the Obvious at Our Peril. New York: Walker, 2011.

Khalil, E. L. “Symbolic Products: Prestige, Pride and Identity Goods.” Theory and Decision 49 (2000): 53–77.

Khalil, E. L. “The Bayesian Fallacy: Distinguishing Internal Motivations and Religious Beliefs from Other Beliefs.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 75 (2010): 268–280.

Khalil, E. L. “Two Kinds of Theory-laden Cognitive Processes: Distinguishing Intransigence from Dogmatism.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (2013a): 38–39.

Khalil, E. L. “Practical Beliefs vs. Scientific Beliefs: Two Kinds of Maximization.” Theory and Decision 74:1 (2013b): 107–126.

Khalil, E. L. “Temptations as Impulsivity: How far are Regret and the Allais Paradox from Shoplifting?” Economic Modelling 51 (2015): 551–559.

Khalil, E. L. “Weakness of Will and Stiffness of Will: How far are Shirking, Slackening, Favoritism, Spoiling of Children, and Pornography from Obsessive-compulsive Behavior?” In Handbook of Behavioral Economics and Smart Decision-making: Rational Decision-making Within the Bounds of Reason, editing by Morris Altman. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2016.

Khalil, E. L. “Making Sense of Self-deception: Distinguishing Self-deception from Delusion, Moral Licensing, Cognitive Dissonance and other Self-distortions.” A mimeo, 2017.

Konow, J. “Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions.” American Economic Review 90 (2000): 1072–1091.

Kuhn, T. S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

Kurzban, R. and C. A. Aktipis. “Modularity and the Social Mind: Are Psychologists too Selfish?” Personality and Social Psychology Review 11 (2007): 131–149.

Lerner, M. J. The Belief in a Just World: A Fundamental Delusion. Plenum: New York, 1980.

McLaughlin, B. P. “On the Very Possibility of Self-deception.” In Self and Deception: A Cross-cultural Philosophical Enquiry, edited by R. T. Ames and W. Dissanayake, 11–25. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996.

Pears, D. Motivated Irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.

Rabin, M. “Cognitive Dissonance and Social Change.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23 (1994): 177–194.

Rorty, A. O. “User-friendly Self-deception: A Traveler’s Manual.” In Self and Deception: A Cross-cultural Philosophical Enquiry, edited by R.T. Ames and W. Dissanayake. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1996.

Sartre, J. -P. Existentialism and Humanism, trans. Philip Mariet. London: Mathuen, 1948.

Taslitz, A. E. “Willfully Blinded: On Date Rape and Self-deception.” Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 28 (2005): 381–446.

von Hippel, W. and R. Trivers. “The Evolution and Psychology of Self-deception.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2001): 1–16.

Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations, trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1968 (1953).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1820-8495 (Print)

ISSN 1820-8509 (Online)