UNIVERSALISM REVIVED: NEEDS-BASED COSMOPOLITANISM AS A FOUNDATION OF GLOBAL DEMOCRACY

Mladen Stojadinović

DOI Number
-
First page
77
Last page
93

Abstract


In the paper it is argued that cosmopolitanism based on human needs would be the most legitimate way to organize the emerging global community. Such cosmopolitanism should be rooted in the notion of basic human needs, for instance: security, autonomy, identity and well-being. Although the notion of human need is universalistic (thereby providing space for meta-consensus), the “human nature” derived from this notion is not necessarily fixed. Deliberation on the needs and political practice of their satisfaction will enable the real progress of cosmopolitanism, more quickly and without numerous problems that the human right-based approach is facing nowadays. Global democracy requests certain universalism in ethics, but it has to be different from those previously attempted, while also the everyday position of individuals in different parts of the world has to be improved considerably.

Key words: human needs, cosmopolitanism, universalism, deliberation, global justice, democracy.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Baban, Feyzi, Cosmopolitanism, Modernity and Political Community, TIPEC Working Paper 03/8, Peterborough, Canada: Trent International Political Economy Centre, Trent University, 2003;

Beck, Ulrich, and Sznaider, Natan, “Unpacking cosmopolitanism for the social sciences: A research agenda”, The British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 61, Issue Supplement S1 (2010), London School of Economics and Political Science, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 381-403;

Benhabib, Seyla, Cosmopolitan Norms, Human Rights and Democratic Iterations, Lecture delivered at Stanford Humanities Center, Written version published online, 2008, Internet, available at the following page: http://www.brown.edu/Research/ppw/files/cosmopolitan%20norms,%20human%20rights%20and%20democratic%20iterations2.doc, accessed on 12/06/2013;

Brock, Gillian, Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009;

Burton, W. John, Conflict: Resolution and Provention, New York: St. Martin's Press, 1990;

Chandler, David, “Critiquing Liberal Cosmopolitanism? The Limits of the Biopolitical Approach”, International Political Sociology, Vol. 3, N° 1 (2009), International Studies Association, Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 53-70;

Cheah, Pheng, Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press, 2007;

Chernilo, Daniel, “A Quest for Universalism: Re-Assessing the Nature of Classical Social Theory’s Cosmopolitanism”, European Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 10, Nº 1 (2007), London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 17-35;

Chernilo, Daniel, “Cosmopolitanism and Social Theory”, Chaper 27 in: The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by Bryan S. Turner, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2009, pp. 533-551;

Donnelly, Jack, “Human rights and Asian values: A defense of “Western” universalism”, Chapter 2 in: The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 60-87;

Donnelly, Jack, Universal human rights in theory and practice, 3rd Edition, SAGE house, Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press;

Douzinas, Costas, Human rights and Empire: Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism, Abingdon, UK: Routledge Cavendish, 2007;

Evrenosoglu, Demet, The Ontological and Political Significance of the Concept of Need in Political Philosophy, Istanbul: Philosophy Department, Bogazici University, 2007, Internet, available at the web page: www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/demetpaper.pdf, accessed on 23/05/2013;

Galtung, Johan, “Violence, Peace and Peace Research”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6, Nº 3 (1969), Peace Research Institute, Oslo: Sage Publications, pp. 167-191;

Galtung. Johan, The basic needs approach, Paper for the “Workshop on needs”, Science Center, International Institute for Environment and Society, Berlin, 1978, available on the Internet, at the following page: http://www.transcend.org/galtung/papers/The%20Basic%20Needs%20Approach.pdf, accessed on 15/05/2013;

Halliday, Fred, “Relativism and Universalism in Human Rights: the Case of the Islamic Middle East”, Political Studies, Vol. XLIII (1995), London: Political Studies Association, pp. 152-167;

Hamilton, Lawrence, The political philosophy of needs, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003;

Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio, Empire, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: Harvard University Press, 2000;

Jabri, Vivienne, War and the Transformation of Global Politics, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, Macmillan, 2007;

Lachapelle, Erick, “Morality, Ethics, and Globalization: Lessons from Kant, Hegel, Rawls and Habermas”, in: Globalization and Political Ethics, edited by Richard B. Day & Joseph Masciulli, Boston: Brill, Leiden, 2007, pp. 353-395;

Latour, Bruno,“Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern”, Critical Inquiry, Vol. 30, Issue – Winter (2004), Chicago: The University of Chicago, pp. 225-249;

Levy, Daniel, and Sznaider, Natan, “Memories of Europe: Cosmopolitanism and Its Others”, Chapter 10 in: Cosmopolitanism and Europe, edited by Chris Rumford, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2007, pp. 157-177;

Liebenberg, Sandra, “Needs, rights and transformation: The adjudication of social rights in South Africa”, Chapter 10 in: (Mis)recognition, social inequality and social justice: Nancy Fraser and Pierre Bourdieu, edited by T. Lovell, Abingdon: Routledge, 2007, pp. 177-199;

Mandle, Jon, “Brock on Global Justice and Choosing Principles”, Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics, Vol. XIII, Nº 1 (2011), University of Trieste: Review of Philosophy, pp. 298-307;

Marker, Sandra, Unmet Human Needs, 2003, Internet, available at the following page: http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/human_needs/, accessed on 18/05/2013;

Maslow, H. Abraham, “A Theory of Human Motivation”, Psychological Review, Vol. 50 (1943), Washington D.C: American Psychological Association, pp. 370-396;

Milanović, Branko, Ethical case and economic feasibility of global transfers, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3775, Washington and University of Maryland: World Bank - Development Research Group (DECRG), 2007;

Miller, Toby, Cultural Citizenship: Cosmopolitanism, Consumerism, and Television in a Neoliberal Age, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2007;

Mills, E. Stewart, Empathising with the enemy, Transformation of Palestinian-Israeli conflict by overcoming psychological and structural obstacles, University of Sydney: MA thesis, 2003;

Mutua, wa Makau, “The Ideology of Human Rights”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol. 36 (1996), Charlottesville: University of Virginia School of Law, pp. 589-657;

Noonan, Jeff, Democratic society and human needs, Montreal: McGill-Queens’ University Press, 2006;

Noonan, Jeffrey, “Human rights and global life-support systems”, Philosophy and World Problems, Vol. 3 (2007), Oxford: Encyclopaedia of Life Support Systems, EOLSS Publishers;

Rubenstein, E. Richard, Basic Human Needs: The Next Steps in Theory Development, 2001, Internet, available at the following page: http://www.gmu.edu/programs/icar/ijps/vol6_1/Rubenstein.htm, accessed on 17/05/2013;

Salam, Dara, “Review of Global justice: A Cosmopolitan Account by Gillian Brock”, Public Reason, Vol. 3, Nº 1 (2011), University of Bucharest, pp. 114-117;

Ypi, Lea, Basic right as social rights: some issues of moral justification and political implementation, Paper presented at 5th Berlin Roundtables on Transnationality, Reframing Human Rights III: Secular and Religious Sources of Human Rights, Irmgard Coninx Stiftung, Berlin, 2006, available on Internet, at the following page: http://www.irmgard-coninx-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/archive/Lea_Ypi_III.pdf, accessed on 14/06/2013;

Wallerstein, Immanuel, European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power, New York, London: The New Press, 2006;

Watt, D. Edward, “Human Needs, Human Wants and Political Consequences”, Political Studies, Vol. 30, N° 4 (1982), Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Inc., pp. 533-543.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1820-8495 (Print)

ISSN 1820-8509 (Online)