POSSIBLE WORLDS IN THE PRECIPICE: WHY LEIBNIZ MET SPINOZA?
Abstract
The main objective of the paper is to give initial answers to three important questions. Why did Leibniz visit Spinoza? Why did his preparation for this meeting include a modification of the ontological proof of God? What is the philosophical result of the meeting and what do possible worlds have to do with it? In order to provide answers, three closely related manuscripts by Leibniz from November 1676 have been compared and the slow conceptual change of his philosophical apparatus has been analyzed. The last of these manuscripts was presented and read in front of Spinoza. Around that time Leibniz abandoned the idea of plurality of worlds (cf. Tschirnhaus) and instead proposed the idea of possible worlds, thus introducing possibility into the (onto/theo)logical structure itself in order to avoid the “precipice” of Spinoza’s necessity. What is interesting, however, is how exactly this conceptual change occurred at the end of 1676 and what its philosophical and methodological implications are.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Blumenfeld, David. "Leibniz's Modal Proof of the Possibility of God". Studia Leibnitiana 4, 2 (1972): 132–40.
———. "Leibniz's Ontological and Cosmological Arguments". In The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, edited by Nicholas Jolley, 353–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Knuuttila, Simo. "Medieval Theories of Modality", 2003. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/modality-medieval.
Kulstad, Mark A. "Leibniz, Spinoza, and Tschirnhaus. Metaphysics À Trois, 1675–1676". In Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes, edited by Olli I. Koistinen and John I. Biro, 221–40. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Lærke, Mogens. "The Problem of Alloglossia. Leibniz on Spinoza's Innovative Use of Philosophical Language". British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17, 5 (2009): 939–53.
Leibniz, Gottfried. Confessio Philosophi. Papers Concerning the Problem of Evil, 1671–1678. Translated by Robert C. Sleigh. The Yale Leibniz, edited by Daniel Garber and Robert C. Sleigh New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005.
———. De Summa Rerum. Metaphysical Papers, 1675-1676. Translated by G. H. R. Parkinson. The Yale Leibniz, edited by Daniel Garber and Robert C. Sleigh. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.
———. "Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Sämtliche Schriften Und Briefe". Darmstadt/Leipzig: Otto Reichl Verlag, 1923-...
———. Philosophical Papers and Letters. Translated by Leroy E. Loemker. The New Synthese Historical Library: Texts and Studies in the History of Philosophy, edited by Simo Knuuttila, II ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.
———. Theodicy: Essays on the Goodness of God, the Freedom of Man and the Origin of Evil. Translated by E.M. Huggard. Charleston: BiblioBazaar, 2007.
Lomasky, Loren E. "Leibniz and the Modal Argument for God's Existence". The Monist 54, 2 (April 1970): 250–69.
Malcolm, Noel. "Leibniz, Oldenburg, and Spinoza, in the Light of Leibniz's Letter to Oldenburg of 18/28 November 1676". Studia Leibnitiana 35, 2 (2003): 225–43.
Nachtomy, Ohad. "A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675-8) ". British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19, 5 (2011): 935–61.
Rescher, Nicholas. "Leibniz on Possible Worlds". Studia Leibnitiana 28, 2 (1996): 129–62.
Spinoza, Baruch. Complete Works. Translated by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2002.
Stewart, Matthew. The Courtier and the Heretic: Leibniz, Spinoza, and the Fate of God in the Modern World. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006.
Vidinsky, Vassil. "Dynamical Interpretation of Leibniz’s Continuum". Kaygı 10 (Spring 2008): 51–70.
Werther, David. "Leibniz and the Possibility of God's Existence". Religious Studies 32, 1 (March 1996): 37–48.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH1703213V
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 1820-8495 (Print)
ISSN 1820-8509 (Online)