Cover Image

ELECTRO-ACOUSTIC INFLUENCE OF THE MEASURING SYSTEM ON THE PHOTOACOUSTIC SIGNAL AMPLITUDE AND PHASE IN FREQUENCY DOMAIN

Sanja M. Aleksic, Dragana K. Markushev, Dragan S. Pantić, Mihajlo D. Rabasović, Dragan D. Markushev, Dragan M. Todorović

DOI Number
10.2298/FUPCT1601009A
First page
9
Last page
20

Abstract


The paper discusses the most common impacts of the measuring system on the amplitude and phase of the photoacoustic signals in the frequency domain using the opencell experimental set-up. The highest signal distortions are detected at the ends of the observed modulation frequency range from 20 Hz to 20 kHz. The attenuation of the signal is observed at lower frequencies, caused by the electronic filtering of the microphone and sound card, with characteristic frequencies of 15 Hz and 25 Hz. At higher frequencies, the dominant signal distortions are caused by the microphone acoustic filtering, having characteristic frequencies around 9 kHz and 15 kHz. It has been found that the microphone incoherent noise, the so called flicker noise, is negligibly small in comparison to the signal and does not affect the signal shape. However, a coherent noise originating from the power modulation system of the light source significantly affects the shape of the signal in the range greater than 10 kHz. The effects of the coherent noise and measuring system influence are eliminated completely using the relevant signal correction procedure targeting the photoacoustic signal generated by the sample.

Keywords

electro-acoustic, photoacoustic signal, measuring system, amplitude, phase, frequency domain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albert A., van der WoerdanWouter C., Serdijn A., 1993. Low-voltage low-power controllable preamplifier for electret microphones”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 28, 10.

Burdett R., 2005, Amplitude modulated signals - the lock-in amplifier, Handbook of Measuring System Design, Wiley, New York, ISBN. 978-0-470-02143-9.

http://www.moultonworld.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Lecture9_page.htm

Lashkari B., Mandelis A., 2011. Comparison between pulsed laser and frequency-domain photoacoustic modalities: Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, resolution, and maximum depth detectivity, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 82, 094903.

Markushev D. D., Rabasović M.D, Todorović D.M., Galović S., Bialkowski S. E., 2015. Photoacoustic signal and noise analysis for Si thin plate: Signal correction in frequency domain, Review of Scientific Instruments vol. 86, 035110; doi: 10.1063/1.4914894.

Marquerinit M.V, Cellat N., Mansanares A.M., Vargas H., Miranda L.C.M., 1991. Open photoacoustic cell spectroscopy, Measurement, Science & Technology, vol. 2, pp. 396-401.

Marquerinit MV, Cellat N, Mansanarest A.M, Vargas H, Miranda L.C.M., 1991. Open photoacoustic cell spectroscopy, Measurement, Science & Technology,vol. 2, pp. 396-401.

McDonald F., Westel G.1978. Generalized theory of the photoacoustic effect, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 49, pp. 2313-2322.

Perondi L.F., Miranda L.C.M., 1987. Minimal-volume photoacoustic cell measurement of thermal diffusivity: Effect of thermoelastic sample bending, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 62, pp. 2955-2959.

Rabasović M.D., Nikolić M.G., Dramićanin M.D., Franko M., Markushev, 2009. Low-cost, portable photoacoustic setup for solid samples, Measurement, Science & Technology, vol. 20, 095902 (6pp), doi:10.1088/0957-0233/20/9/095902.

Rosencwaig A, Gersho A., 1976. Theory of the photoacoustic effect with solids, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 47, pp. 64-69.

Roussel G., Lepoutre F., Bertrand L., 1983. Influence of thermoelastic bending on photoacoustic experiments related to measurements of thermal diffusivity of metals, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 54, pp. 2383-2391.

Scofield J.H., 1994. Frequency-domain description of a lock-in amplifier, American Journal of Physics (AAPT), vol. 62, pp. 129–133.

Somer A., Camilotti F., Costa G.F., Bonardi C., Novatski A., Andrade A.V.C., Kozlowski V.A., Jr., Cruz G.K., 2013. The thermoelastic bending and thermal diffusion processes influence on photoacoustic signal generation using open photoacoustic cell technique, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 114, 063503.

Telenkov S., Mandelis A., 2010. Signal-to-noise analysis of biomedical photoacoustic measurements in time and frequency domains, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 81, 124901.

Todorović D.M., Markushev D. Rabasović M.D., 2013. Photoacoustic elastic bending in thin film - Substrate system, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 114, 213510; doi: 10.1063/1.4839835.

Todorović D.M., Rabasović M.D., Markushev D. D., Sarajlić M., 2014. Photoacoustic elastic bending in thin film-substrate system: Experimental determination of the thin film parameters, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 116, 053506.

Vargas H., Miranda L.C.M., 1988. Photoacoustic and Related Photothermal Techniques, Phys. Rep., vol. 16, pp. 45-101.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/fu%20pct.v14i1.1529

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-4656 (print)

ISSN 2406-0879 (online)