A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR POSITIONING THE ARCHITECT WITHIN A CONTINUAL DIGITAL APPROACH TO DESIGNING ARCHITECTURE: THE “DIGITAL CHAIN” CASE
Abstract
Studying the development of digital technology in architecture during the last thirty years highlights the opportunity for exploring the process of positioning the architect within an architectural approach based on the continual digital data-driven design and realization, using the example of the “digital chain” principle. Digital tools and processes have evolved driven by technological advancements and supporting the architectural design, but also challenging the influence and role of the architect as designer.
Accordingly, the positioning of the architect within the design and realization of architecture is a process that constantly is developing, evolving, progressing and changing, but not simultaneously with the development of technology. The paper investigates this with the focus on the “digital chain”, which is the continual approach that links architectural design and realization by coding the process and involving digital fabrication (machine and material) and the architect in each step of architectural accomplishments.
Methodologically, this research is based on overlapping the information of a (rapid) review of the continual digital data-driven design principle (example of “digital chain”) over time and the conventional (analog) design focused both on architect’s discourse, role and influence in the current and future design and implementation of works of architecture. The paper does not define the exact position of the architect in the “digital chain” because the process is further evolving and also depends on the type of fabrication, taking into account the freedom of choice of the architect. It does, however, identify the zone and type of influence of the process effects on the architect, and determines the necessity and role of the architect as a designer in the process.
The work aims to define and outline the currently developing conceptual framework of the positioning of architects, while a precise definition of the position would hinder the architect from expressing creativity. However, new research directions open a scientific field of constant redefinition of the design process with architectural influence in terms of activities and characteristics of the role of the architect within continual digital approaches to designing architecture.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A.R. Doshi and O.P. Hauser, Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content, Science Advances, 2024, Vol 10, Issue 28, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290
A.Picon, The materiality of architecture, Minneapolis:University of Minnesota press, 2020.
Sakshi, A.Maruna, A.K. Sharma, Blockchain-based digital chain of custody multimedia evidence preservation framework for internet-of-things, Journal of Information Security and Applications, Elsevier, Volume 77, September 2023, doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2023.103579
A. Witt, A machine epistemology in architecture Translated By Annette Wiethuchter. Candide-Journal For Architectural Knowledge, 2010.
B. Colomina, and M.Wigley, Are we Human? Netherlands: Lars Mueller Publishers, 2016/2022.
B. Lawson, How designer think, New York: Routledge, 2005.
B. Lawson, What designers know, Oxford: Architectural press, 2004.
B. Lawson and K. Dorst, Design Expertise, New York: Routledge, 2009.
B. Peters, T. Peters, Inside smartgeometry - Expanding the Architectural Possibilities of Computational Design, Chichester: Wiley, 2013.
D. Schodek, M. Betchthold, K. Griggs, M.K.Kao, M. Steinberg, Digital design and manufacturing, Hoboken: Wiley, 2005.
D. Cuff, Introduction: Architecture’s Double-Bind. The Sage Handbook of Architectural Theory, 2012, pp. 385-393.
E. Paulos, The Rise of the Expert Amateur: DIY Culture and the Evolution of Computer Science, ASPLOS'13 Proceedings of the eighteenth international conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, 2013, pp. 153-154.
F. Gramazio, M. Kohler, S. Langenberg, ed., Fabricate, ETH Zuerich: gta Verlag, 2014.
F. Moussavi, and D. Lopez, The function of form. Actar, 2009.
G. Vrachliotis, On New Technological Condition, Birkhaeuser, 2022.
H. Simon, The science of artificial, Cambridge: MIT press, 1996.
I. Miodragovic Vella, Markovic, S., Topological Interlocking Assembly: Introduction to Computational Architecture, Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(15), 6409; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14156409
I. Miodragovic Vella, Digital design in ‘peripheral’contexts, Volume 1 - Digital Design Reconsidered - eCAADe 41, 2023, pp.61-68.
I. Miodragovic Vella, A stereotomic approach to regional digital architecture University of Malta, 2019.
I. Svetel, Information in Architecture in the Digital Age, Conference: On Architecture Philosophy of Architecture, 2022.
K. Subrin, S. Garnier, T. Bressac, B. Furet, Digital chain development for sanding application with a kinematically redundant robotic system, Procedia CIRP Volume 82, 2019, pp.515-520, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.063
L. Mangliar, M.Hudert, Enabling circularity in building construction: Experiments with robotically assembled interlocking structures, Structures and Architecture A Viable Urban Perspective?, 2022, pp. 585-592
L. Hovestadt, On Digital Architecture, Volume I, II, Books I-III, Books, IV-VI. ETH Zuerich: Birkhaeuser, 2023.
L. Hovestadt, Catalog of Special exhibition of CAAD Chair, ETH Zuerich. Basel:Swissbau-Basel, 2005.
M. Burry, Scripting Cultures - Architectural Design and Programming. AD Architectural Design, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2011.
M. Carpo, 2023. “A short but believable history of the digital turn in architecture.” Accessed Mai 3, 2024. https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/chronograms/528659/a-short-but-believable-history-of-the-digital-turn-in-architecture/
M. Carpo, The Digital Turn in Architecture 1992-2012. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
M. Carpo, The alphabet and the algorithm. MIT Press, 2011.
M.L. Chiu The jump of digital design thinking Ecaade 2006
M. Cvetić, S. Marković, Experience and theory in architectural design: Digital chain case, AM: Journal of art and media studies, No. 12/2017, theme: Architecture with(in) art and theory, Faculty of Media and Communication, Belgrade: Singidunum University and Orion art (2017): 121-134
M. Numfu, A. Riel, F. Noël, Virtual reality based digital chain for creating a knowledge base of hand gestures in maintenance tasks, Procedia CIRP, Volume 90, 2020, Pages 648-653, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.122
N. Cross, Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work, 2nd edition, London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2023.
N. Cross, Designerly Ways of Knowing, Basel-Boston-Berlin: Birkhaeuser, 2006.
N. Negroponte, Being Digital. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1995.
O. Meski, F. Belkadi, F. Laroche, B. Furet, Towards a knowledge-based framework for digital chain monitoring within the industry 4.0 paradigm, Procedia CIRP Volume 84, 2019, Pages 118-123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.250
P. Dohmen, K. Rüdenauer, ETH Zürich Institute for CAAD. Professor Dr. Ludger Hovestadt, Digital Chains in Modern Architecture, eCAADe 25, 2006, pp. 801-804
R. Aish, From intuition to precision, AA Files, No.52, Architectural Association, 2005, pp. 62.
R.A. Loveridge, Process Bifurcation and the Digital Chain in Architecture, PhD dissertation, EPFL, 2012.
S. Markovic, Size in the process of design and realization in emerging architecture – the Digital Chain approach, SAJ, Faculty of Architecture University of Belgrade, Vol 12, No1, 2020, pp.21-35.
S. Markovic,. Integrity and Life in process of design and realization in emerging architecture – Digital Chain case, Structural Integrity and Life Vol. 20, No 1 (2020): 3–10.
S. Markovic, Svetel I. and Z. Lazović, Redefinition of the process of design and realization in emerging architecture on the principle of "digital chain", Facta Universitatis – series architecture and civil engineering, 2017. 15(3): 295-306.
S. Markovic, "Positioning of and architect in the process of design and realization of architecture based on a principle of a "digital chain", PhD dissertation (in Serbian, in procedure), University in Belgrade, 2016.
S. Markovic, The guide through the process of "digital chain" in architecture (bilingual: Serbian/ English), Endowment Andrejević, Belgrade, 2013.
S. Markovic, and A. Nikezic, Revising the Position and Scope of Being Digital in Architectural Design, 2024. in publication procedure
V. Miller, Understanding digital culture, London: Sage publications, 2011.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 0354-4605 (Print)
ISSN 2406-0860 (Online)
COBISS.SR-ID 98807559