NUDGE, SHOVE, BUDGE, SLUDGE AND ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN: Terminological Demarcation and Practical Implications

Aleksandar S Mojašević, Ljubica Nikolić

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP2102083M
First page
083
Last page
096

Abstract


In this paper, the authors provide a precise terminological demarcation of the following behavioral concepts: “nudge”, “shove”, and “budge”. Based on these concepts and three defined criteria (freedom/coercion, internalities/externalities, and behavioral insights), the authors explain various behavioral public policies and their practical implications: 1) the behavioral public policy of libertarian-paternalistic orientation (the “nudge policy”); 2) the policy of coercive paternalism; and 3) the behavioral regulation of externalities. Then, the authors provide a terminological distinction between the concept of “sludge” and “nudge”, and discuss their potential misuses. Finally, based on the level of “frictions”, the authors distinguish between the concepts of “administrative burden” and “sludge”, as well as the types of public policies that are recommended for their reduction, particularly “sludge audits”. The conclusion is that all these public policies are very close, slightly different in terms of the subject matter of regulation and the intensity of encroachment on the freedoms of individuals, but that they all have a common root in behavioral insights.

Keywords

Behavioral Economics, nudge, shove, budge, sludge, administrative burden, behavioral public policies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk costs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 35. 124−140.

Bhargava, S., Manoli, D. (2015). Improving take-up of tax benefits in the United States. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab; available at: https://www.povertyactionlab.org/evaluation/improvingtake- tax-benefits-united-states [https://perma.cc/TPW8-XDHU].

Herd, P., Moynihan, D. P. (2019). Administrative Burden: Policymaking by Other Means. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Institute for Government, UK (2010). Mindspace: Influencing behaviour through public policy, Cabinet Office and Institute for Government; available at: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/MINDSPACE.pdf

Jerinić, J., Vučetić, D., Stanković, M. (2020). Priručnik za sprovođenje principa dobrog upravljanja na lokalnom nivou (Handbook for Implementing the Principles of Good Governance at the Local Level). Stalna konferencija gradova i opština, Savez gradova i opština Srbije, Beograd; available at: http://www.skgo.org/storage/app/uploads/public/161/183/388/1611833880_Prirucnik_DU.pdf

Jovanić, T. (2014). Proces regulacije (The Process of Regulation). Pravni fakultet Univerzitet u Beogradu, Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje.

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica. 47(2). 263–292.

Kaneman, D. (2015). Misliti brzo i sporo (Thinking fast and slow). Smederevo: Heliks.

Karaulac, T. (2008). Procena troškova određenih administrativnih procedura u Srbiji (Cost Estimation of Certain Administrative Procedures in Serbia). Beograd: Naled; available at: https://ceves.org.rs/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Estimation-of-resources-impact-for-selected-business-related-administrative-procedures_2008.pdf

Kovač, P. (2021). Debureaucratization Limits in Administrative Procedures Codification: Lessons from Slovenia. Administrative Science. 11/1. 1‒17.

Luguri, J., Strahilewitz, L. (2021). Shining a Light on Dark Patterns. Journal of Legal Analysis. 13(1). 43–109.

Ministry of Infrastructure RS and Public Enterprise Roads of Serbia (2010). Manual Cost Benefit Analysis ‒ Republic of Serbia, December, 2010; available at: https://www.putevi-srbije.rs/images/pdf/strategija/Manual_Cost_Benefit_Analysis.pdf

Mitchell, G. (2004). Libertarian Paternalism Is an Oxymoron. Northwestern University Law Review. 99(3). 1248–1276; available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228249621_Libertarian_Paternalism_Is_an_Oxymoron

Mojašević, A. (2020). Behavioural Economics and Public Policies: Some Introductory Issues. Facta universitatis. 18(3). 131–145.

Mojašević, A., Nikolić, Lj. (2018). Kognitivne pristrasnosti u pravnoj oblasti: mesto susreta pravne i biheviorističke nauke (Cognitive Biases in the Legal Field: a Meeting Place of Legal and Behavioral Science). Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu (Collection of papers of the Faculty of Law in Niš). 79. 253‒273.

Mojašević, А. (2021). Primena biheviorističkih nalaza u javnim politikama (Application of Behavioral Insights in Public Policies). Dosije Studio, Beograd, SeCons Beograd i Univerzitet u Nišu.

Nikolić, Lj., Mojašević, A. (2016). Ekonomija za pravnike (Economics for Lawyers). Niš: Medivest.

Republički sekretarijat za javne politike/Republic Secretariat for Public Policies-RSPP (2020). Priručnik za analizu efekata javnih politika i propisa (Handbook for analyzing the effects of public policies and regulations); available at: https://rsjp.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/Prirucnik-za-analizu-efekata-javnih-politika-i-propisa-21012021-srb.pdf

Ryan, R., Deci, E. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist. 55(1). 68–78.

Samson, A. (Ed.) (2021). The Behavioral Economics Guide 2021 (with an Introduction by John List). https://www.behavioraleconomics.com/be-guide/.

Sharot, T. (2011). The optimism bias. Current Biology. 21(23). R941–R945.

Sunstein, K. (2013). Simpler: The Future of Government. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, New Delhi: Simon & Schuster.

Sunstein, K. (2020a). Sludge Audits. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2020. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-public-policy/article/sludge-audits/12A7E338984CE8807CC1E078EC4F13A7#article

Sunstein, K. (2020b). Too Much Information: Understanding What You Don't Want to Know. The MIT Press.

Tasoff, J., Letzler, R. (2014). Everyone believes in redemption: Nudges and overoptimism in costly task completion. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 107. 107–122.

Thaler, R. (2018). ‘Nudge, not sludge’. Science. 361(6401). 431.

Thaler, R., Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth and Happiness. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 5. 297–323.

Vlada Republike Srbije (2019). Program za pojednostavljenje administrativnih postupaka i regulative „e-Papir” za period 2019-2021 (“E-Paper” Program for Simplification of Administrative Procedures and Regulation for the period 2019‒2021), Beograd, 11. jul 2019; available at: https://rsjp.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/Program-ePAPIR_final_usvojeno_110719.pdf

Vukov, T. (2015). Primena teorije usmeravanja u javnim politikama (The Application of Nudge Theory in public policies). Administracija i javne politike (Administration and public policies). 3(3–2015). 59–76.

Zamir, Е., Teichman, D. (2008). Behavioral Law and Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zakon o planskom sistemu Republike Srbije (The Planning System Act), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 30/2018.

Online sources

Cambridge University Press (2021): Cambridge Dictionary (online): https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/budge; https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/nudge; https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/shove

E-Uprava (2021): Registar administrativnih postupaka za privredu (Register of Administrative Proceedings - RAP); https://rap.euprava.gov.rs/privreda/home

Investopedia.com (2021): Ponzi Scheme; https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/ponzischeme.asp




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP2102083M

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)