THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF STRICT COMPLIANCE IN LETTERS OF CREDIT IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL LAW
Abstract
Letter of Credit (L/C) is a very popular payment method in international trade. The issuing bank has the obligation to make payment if the document stipulated in a Letter of Credit are presented. Under the strict compliance principle, any discrepancy in the documents may be the reason for refusing payment. There are two different approaches to the interpretation of the principle of strict compliance: literal compliance and substantial compliance. In literal compliance, a slightest inaccuracy may be the reason for refusing payment, which is not the case in substantive interpretation. The author provides an overview of these two approaches, with specific reference to relevant case law and relevant provisions of the UCP Rules and ISBP Rules governing this international trade matter. These international rules and diverse case law offer opportunities for a more flexible and balanced approach to the interpretation of strict compliance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adodo, Ebenezer O.I. (2005). An Appraisal of the Fraud Exception and the Principle of Strict Compliance in Letters of Credit, National University of Singapore, LLM Thesis, 2005, 119 pages.
Alavi, Hamed (2016). Risk Analysis in Documentary Letter of Credit Operation, Financial Law Review, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Gdañsk, Vol.1, Issue 4, 2016, pp.27-45.
Alavi, Hamed (2018). What Is Compliant Presentation under the Law of Documentary Letters of Credit? A Critical Analysis of Article 14 of the UCP 600, East-West Studies, No:9, 2018, pp.35-47.
Arban, Erika (2005). The Doctrine of Strict Compliance in the Italian Legal System, Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol:23, No:1, 2005, pp.77-104.
Atabaş, Nuşen Pelin Dalgıç (2009). UCP 600 Açısından Bankaların Belgelerle Bağlı Olması Kuralı, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, Volume:134, Issue: January-February, 2018, pp.487-518.
Carr, Indira (2009). International Trade Law, Routledge, 4th Edition, 2009, 738 pages.
Chigerwe, Evelyn (2016). A Critical Assessment of the Requirements for Documentary Compliance in the Law of Letters of Credit, University of Johannesburg Faculty of Law, LLM Dissertation, 2016, 32pp.
Conley, Todd (2001). Hanil Bank v. Pt. Bank Negara Indonesia: The Problem with Form over Substance in Documentary Compliance Rules, Catholic University Law Review, Vol: 50, Issue: 4, 2001, pp.977-1008.
Chow, Daniel C.K & Schoenbaum, Thomas J. (2015). International Business Transactions Problems, Cases, and Materials (3rd ed.), Wolters Kluwer, 2015, p.242
Gao, Xiang (2007). The Fraud Rule in Law of Letters of Credit in the P.R.C., The International Lawyer, Vol.41, 2007, pp.1067-1090.
Karim, Ridoan & Islam, Md. Zahidul (2016), Critical Analysis of the Principle of Strict Compliance in Letter of Credit Operation with Relation to the UCP 600, Journal of Asian and African Social Science and Humanities, Vol:2, No:3, 2016, pp.105-114.
Kelly-Louw, Michelle (2016). The Doctrine of Strict Compliance in the context of Demand Guarantees, Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa (CILSA), Vol: 49, 2016, pp.85-129.
Khan, Naeem Ullah & Fareed, M. Nadeem (2020). Jurisprudential Insight on Principles of Documentary Letter of Credit and Its Impact on International Business Transactions, Journal of Law and Society, Vol: LI, No: 76, July 2020, pp.87-102.
Kim, Yong Eui (2017). The Duty of Banks to Examine the Documents of Letters of Credit in View of Korean Courts, Kangwon Natl. Univ. Kangwon Law Review, Vol.50, 2017, pp.529-554.
Krazovska, Danute (2008). Impact of the Doctrine of Strict Compliance on a Letter of Credit Transaction, Master Thesis, University of Aarhus School of Business, 2008, 76 pages.
Kwaw, Edmund Ato (2021). Strict or Substantial Compliance in Letters of Credit: Crafting Guidelines for Verifying Documentary Compliance, E-Journal of Law, Vol.7 Issue:1, 2021, pp.51-87.
Leary, Fairfax & Ippoliti, Michael (1987). Letters of Credit: Have We Fully Recovered From Three Insolvency Shocks?, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, Vol:9, Issue:4, 1987, pp.595-647.
Leon, Christopher (1986). Letters of Credit: a Primer, Maryland Law Review, Volume:45, Issue:2, 1986, pp.432-464.
Low, Hang Yen (2010a). Grounds for Withholding Payment in Documentary Credits, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2010, 250 pages. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/75551.pdf
Low, Hang Yen (2010b). UCP 600: The New Rules on Documentary Compliance, International Journal of Law and Management, Vol:52, Issue:3, 2010, pp. 193-210.
Toth, Zsuzsanna (2006). Documentary Credits in International Commercial Transactions with Special Focus on the Fraud Rule, Pázmány Peter Catholic University, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Ph.D. Thesis, 2006, 180 pages.
Warnasuriya, Chathura (2021). Fraud Unravels All; Do Fraudulent Documents Invalidate A Letter of Credit?, KDU Law Journal, Volume:1, Issue:1, 2021, pp.17-31.
Legal documents
The International Standard Banking Practice for the Examination of Documents under Documentary Credits (2007 Revision for UCP 600), ICC publication no. 681; available at https://sites.google.com/a/tradefinanceguru.net/www/international-rules/isbp (accessed on 19.08.2022)
The Uniform Customs and Practices for Documentary Credits, 1993 Revision, (the UCP 500 Rules), ICC Publ. 500; available at https://digilander.libero.it/Viniciuss/ucp500.pdf (accessed on 19.08.2022)
The Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, 2007 Revision (the UCP 600 Rules), ICC Publication no. 600, the International Chamber of Commerce’s (ICC); available at http://static.elmercurio.cl/Documentos/Campo/2011/09/06/2011090611422.pdf (accessed 19.08.2022)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP2202125A
Refbacks
ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)