THE IMPORTANCE OF EMPIRICAL METHODS IN LEGAL RESEARCH: THE CASE OF CRIMINOLOGY, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW, AND LAW AS AN ALGORITHM

Aleksandar Mojašević, Predrag Cvetković, Darko Dimovski

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP230623011M
First page
109
Last page
124

Abstract


This chapter examines the empirical methods applicable in Criminology, Economic Analysis of Law, and the law embodied in the form of algorithms. The first part of the paper explores the empirical research methods used in Criminology. Focusing on the fundamental features of criminological methodology, the chapter elaborates on fundamental and applied research. The second part focuses on interdisciplinary methodology applicable in the field of Economic Analysis of Law (EAL), and examines the accompanying controversies and challenges generated by the development of behavioral research that has fundamentally changed the findings of the EAL. The third part elaborates on the importance of empirical data in the context of law as an algorithm and the “new trichotomy” reflecting the nature of data: text-driven law, data-driven law, and code-driven law. The trichotomy emerges as a result of an attempt to transform legal norms into machine-readable algorithms, as well as to ensure the application of these modalities in the legal context. The authors discuss the importance of empirical methods in law and the “extension” of standard legal methodology.


Keywords

empirical methods, legal research, criminology, law and economics, law as algorithm, big data

Full Text:

PDF

References


I part

Arnaudovski, Lj. (2007). Kriminologija [Criminology]. 2-ri Avgust S-Štip, Skopje.

Bernasco, W., Jacques, S. (2015). Where do dealers solicit customers and sell them drugs? a micro-level multiple method study. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 31(4): 376–408.

Buckle, A., Farrington, D.P. (1994). Measuring shoplifting by systematic observation: a replication study. Psychology. Crime & Law. 1:133‒141.

Dimovski, D. (2010). Kompjuterski kriminalitet [Computer Crime]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 55:193‒210.

Dimovski, D. (2019). Kriminalna etiologija [Criminal Etiology]. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu, Centar za publikacije, Niš.

Dimovski, D., Turanjanin, V., Kolaković-Bojović, M., Čvorović, D. (2020). Attitudes toward euthanasia of students of law and medicine in Serbia. Iranian Journal of Public Health. Tehran, Iranian Public Health Association, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 49(2):400‒402.

Goffman, A. (2014). On the run: Fugitive life in an American city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Konstantinović Vilić, S., Nikolić Ristanović, V. (1998). Kriminologija [Criminology]. Studentski kulturni centar, Niš.

Konstantinović Vilić, S., Nikolić Ristanović, V., Kostić, M. (2009). Kriminologija [Criminology]. Pelikant Print, Niš.

Konstantinović Vilić, S., Nikolić Ristanović, V., Kostić, M. (2012). Kriminologija [Criminology]. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Nišu, Niš.

Korn, R., McCorkle, L. (1959). Criminology and Penology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

Kostić, M., Dimovski, D. (2010). Kriminalitet „belog okovratnika“ (kriminološki osvrt) [“White-collar” crime- Criminological overview)]. Socijalna misao, Beograd.

Kostić, M., Dimovski, D. (2013). Osuđeničke bande u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama [Convict gangs in the United States]. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 65:219‒235.

Kostić, M., Dimovski, D., Mirić, F. (2015). Maloletnička delinkvencija kroz prizmu novinskih izveštaja u dnevnom listu Politika 1904-1941 [Juvenile delinquency in light of the newspaper reports published in the daily Politika 1904‒1941]. Centar za publikacije Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Nišu, Niš.

Levine, M., Taylor, P.J., Best, R. (2011). Third parties, violence, and conflict resolution: the role of group size and collective action in the microregulation of violence. Psychological Science. 22(3):406–412.

Lindegaard, M.R., Copes, H. (2017). Observation methods of offender decision making. In: Bernasco, W., Van Gelder, J.L., Elffers, H. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Offender Decision Making (Chapter 24). Oxford University Press Publisher, New York.

Marković, I. (2010). Osnovi kriminologije [Basics of Criminology]. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Banja Luci, Banja Luka.

Marsh, I., Melville, G., Morgan, K., Norris, G., Walkington, Z. (2006). Theories of Crime. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, New York.

Michell, J. (1999). Measurement in Psychology: a critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Milutinović, M. (1979). Kriminologija [Criminology]. Savremena administracija, Beograd.

Nassauer, A (2015). Effective crowd policing: empirical insights on avoiding protest violence. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management. 38(1):3‒23.

Newman, G.R. (1977). Problems of methods in comparative criminology. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice. 1(1‒2):17‒31.

Sharma, R.K. (1998). Criminology and Penology. Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi.

Stanojoska, A., Aslimoski, P. (2019). Kriminologija [Criminology]. Univerzitet “Sv. Kliment Ohridski”, Bitola.

Sutherland, E.H., Cressey, D.R., Luckenbill, D.F. (1992). Principles of Criminology. General Hall, New York.

Vander Laenen, F. (2021) Focus groups. In: Barnes, J.C., Forde, D.R. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice. Wiley, pp. 402‒404.

Zakon o izvršenju krivičnih sankcija [Act on the Execution of Criminal Sanctions], Službeni glasnik RS, br. 55-2014, 35/2019.

II part

Becker, G. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Begović, B., Labus, M., Jovanović, A. (2013). Ekonomija za pravnike [Economics for Lawyers]. Izdavački centar Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd.

Cooter, R., Ulen, T. (2016). Law & Economics. 6th edition. Berkeley Law Books, Book 2.

Cornell Law School – CELS Conferences. https://community.lawschool.cornell.edu/sels/cels-conferences/. Accessed 7 March 2023

Engel, C. (2014). Behavioral Law and Economics: empirical methods. In: Zamir, E., Teichman. D. (eds.). The oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 125–142.

Hicks, J.R. (1939). The Foundations of Welfare Economics. The Economic Journal. 49(196):696–712.

Holmes, O.W. (1897). The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review. 10(8):457‒478.

Jolls, C., Sunstein, C.R., Thaler, R.H. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review. 50:1471–1550.

Kaldor, N. (1939). Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. The Economic Journal. 49(195):549–552.

Kaplow, L., Shavell, S. (2006). Fairness versus welfare. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.

Korobkin, R.B., Ulen, T.S. (2000). Law and behavioral science: removing the rationality assumption from law and economics. California Law Review. 88(4):1051‒1144.

Kuhn, T. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Landes, W.M. (2003). The empirical side of law and economics. University of Chicago Law Review. 70:167‒180.

Lawless, R., Robbennolt, J., Ulen, T. (2010). Empirical Methods in Law. Wolters Kluwer, Austin, Boston, Chicago, New York, The Nederlands.

Mackaay, E. (2013). Law and Economics for civil law systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA.

Milić, T. (2019). Empirijsko istraživanje prava: revolucija ili nemoguća misija? [Empirical Research of Law: a revolution or mission impossible?]. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu. 3/2019:95‒123.

Mojašević, A. (2020). Behavioral economics and public policies: some introductory issues. Facta Universitatis. 18(3):131–145.

Mojašević, A. (2021). Primena biheviorističkih nalaza u javnim politikama [Application of behavioral insights in public policies]. Dosije Studio Beograd, Univerzitet u Nišu, SeCons – grupa za razvojnu inicijativu Beograd.

Pareto, V. (1906). Manuel d'économie politique. http://www.ecn.ulaval.ca/~pgon/hpe/documents/neoclassiques/Pareto.pdf

Posner, R. (1986). Economic Analysis of Law. 3rd edition – digitized by the internet archive in 2012. Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, New York.

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Original edition. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England.

Rowley, C.K. (1989). Public choice and the economic analysis of law. In: Mercuro, N. (ed.). Law and Economics. recent economic thought series. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Vol. 19, pp. 123‒173.

Samson, A. (ed.) (2022). The Behavioral Economics Guide 2022. https://www.behavioraleconomics.com/be-guide/

Teitelbaum, J., Zeiler, K. (2018). Research Handbook on Behavioral Law and Economics. Books 35.

Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R. (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven & London.

Ulen, T. (2014). The importance of behavioral Law. In: Zamir, E., Teichman, D. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 93–124.

Zamir, Е., Teichman, D. (2018). Behavioral Law and Economics. Oxford University Press, New York.

III part

Allen, L.E. (2013). Symbolic Logic: a razor-edged tool for drafting and interpreting legal documents. In: Brewer, S. (ed.). Logic, probability, and presumptions in legal reasoning. Routledge, New York, pp. 1‒48.

Ashley, K. (2017). Artificial Intelligence and legal analytics: new tools for law practice in the digital age. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Barker, C. (2017). Artificial intelligence: direct and indirect impacts on the legal profession. TortSourcea. 19(3):1‒4.

Cvetković, P. (2021). Contract as an algorithm: Introductory considerations. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 60(92):15‒34.

Hage, J. (2006). Studies in legal logic. In: Law and philosophy library. Springer Dordrecht, vol. 70.

Herbert, L. (2014). Technology’s limited role in resolving debates over digital surveillance. Science. 345(6198):728‒730.

Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Law as computation in the era of artificial legal intelligence: speaking law to the power of statistics. University of Toronto Law Journal. 68:12‒35.

Hildebrandt, M. (2020). Code-driven law: freezing the future and scaling the past. In: Deakin, S., Markou, C. (eds.) Is law computable? critical perspectives on law and artificial intelligence. Hart Publishers, pp. 67‒84.

Lin, H. (2014). Technology's limited role in resolving debates over digital surveillance. Science. 345(6198): 728‒730.

Madarász, R. (2012). Matematička logika [Mathematical logic]. Prirodno-matematički fakultet Univerziteta u Novom Sadu, Novi Sad.

Schauer, F. (2013). On the open texture of law. Grazer Philosophische Studien. 87(1):197–215.

Sileno, G. (2022). Code-driven law NO, normware SI! Paper presented at the CRCL conference “Computational Law on Edge”, Brussels, 3 November 2022.

Vecht, J.J. (2020). Open texture clarified. Inquiry. Taylor & Francis, 1‒21.

Williams, S. (2022). Contract maps. Forthcoming in 91 University of Missouri-Kansas City Law Review 91.

Wolff, L. (2022). Algorithmen als richter. https://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-ubtr/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1835/file/Dissertation_Wolff.pdf.pdf. Accessed 15 March 2022.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP230623011M

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)