THE IMPORTANCE OF TRANSPARENCY IN CENTRAL BANKS LEGISLATION

Marko B. Dimitrijević

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP250312007D
First page
081
Last page
093

Abstract


The subject matter of analysis in this paper is the importance of the transparency principle in the central bank's legislation, as a significant determinant of the effectiveness and efficiency of adopted solutions for achieving monetary stability as a public good. In this context, the first part of the paper examines the importance and functions of transparency of acts and actions of the central bank in contemporary monetary law. The second part discusses various theoretical assumptions in the regulation conception of the highest monetary authority in comparative legislation. The third part focuses on the contribution of the ombudsman in framing democratic monetary governance based on credibility in the visibility of the central bank actions, which has significant implications in the field of human rights protection. In this regard, the author refers to the Law of the European Central Bank, which has a great impact on the formation of monetary jurisdictions in the international context. By applying dogmatic, axiological, and comparative law methods, the author seeks to contribute to a functional and essential understanding of the importance and place of the transparency principle in positioning monetary legislation in the function of achieving personal and social well-being. The author also endeavours to identify the domains and limits of transparency in the work of the central bank in dynamic and complex social circumstances.

Keywords

monetary law, central bank, rule of law, transparency, ombudsman

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bateman, W. (2021). The Law of Monetary Finance under Unconventional Monetary Policy, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 00, No. 0, pp. 1-36.

Bateman, W., Allen, J. (2021). The Law of Central Bank Reserve Creation, Modern Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 401-434.

Belov, M. (2019). (ed). Judicial Dialogue. The Hague, Eleven International Publishing.

Costa, P. J. (2017). La Cour Européenne des Droits de L’homme, Des juges pour la liberté, Paris, Dalloz.

Dimitrijević, M. (2022). Monetarni kredibilitet kao društvena vrednost u savremenom monetarnom pravu i pravu centralnih banaka (Monetary Credibility as Social Value in the Contemporary Monetary Law and Law of the Central Bank), Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, br, 99, str. 97-118.

Dimitrijević, M. (2023). Pravo Evropske centralne banke (Law of the European Central Bank), Grafika Galeb, Niš.

Egidy, S. (2019). Judicial Review of Central Bank Actions: Can Europe Learn from the United States? In Building Bridges: Central Banking Law in an Interconnected World, ECB Legal Conference 2019, ECB, Frankfurt am Mein, pp. 53-76. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/legconf/pdf/ecb.ecblegalconferenceproceedings201912~9325c45957.en.pdf

Eskridge, W. N., Ferejohn, J. (2010). A Republic of Statutes: The New American Constitution, Yale University Press.

Lee, M. (2015). Accountability and Co-Production Beyond Courts: The Role of the European Ombudsman (June 24, 2015), In: Weimer and de Ruijter (eds), Regulating Risks in the European Union: The co-production of expert and executive power, pp.1-23, SSRN:http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2866466.

Mihajlović, A. (2024). Public Policy and Regulatory Impact Assessment in the Serbian Legal Framework, Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics, Vol. 22. No. 1, pp. 47-55.

Shultz, D. (2024). Constitutional Precedent in the US Supreme Court Reasoning, Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics, Vol 22. No. 2, pp. 119-129.

Villard Duran, C., Steinberg, D. F. (2019). Guarding the Money Guardian: How the Ombudsman is enhancing the legal framework for European Central Bank transparency, GEG Working Paper, No. 140, The Global Economic Governance Programme, University of Oxford, pp. 1-29, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/224116/1/1666222747.pdf

Villard Duran, C. (2015). The Framework for the Social Accountability of Central Banks: The Growing Relevance of the Soft Law in Central Banking, European Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 8, pp. 120-122.

Legal Documents

ECB/2014/6: ECB Decision on the organization of preparatory measures for AnaCredit.

ECB/2014/7: ECB Recommendation on the organization of preparatory measures for AnaCredit.

ECB/2015: Draft ECB Regulation on the collection of granular credit and credit risk data, the European Central Bank, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/money/aggregates/anacredit/shared/pdf/draft_regulation_granular_and_credit_risk_data.en.pdf

ECB/2016/14: ECB Decision amending ECB/2014/6 on the organization of preparatory measures for AnaCredit.

ECB Regulation (EU) 2016/867 of the European Central Bank of 18 May 2016 on the collection of granular credit and credit risk data (ECB/2016/13), Official Journal of the EU L 144, 1.6.2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/867/oj/eng

Explanatory note on the draft ECB Regulation on the collection of granular credit and credit risk data; https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/money/aggregates/anacredit/shared/pdf/explanatory_note.en.pdf

ECB/2017/38: ECB Guideline on the procedures for the collection of AnaCredit data from NCBs, as amended by Guideline (EU) 2020/381 of the European Central Bank of 21 February 2020 and Guideline (EU) 2021/1829 of the European Central Bank of 7 October 2021.

Explanatory note on the ECB Regulation ECB/2017/38. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/ecb_statistics/anacredit/html/index.en.html

ECB/2019/20: ECB Decision on the procedure for non-euro area MSs to report under the AnaCredit regulation, the European Central Bank, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/ecb_statistics/anacredit/html/index.en.html

European Central Bank (2015). What is AnaCredit? 1 November 2015 (updated on 20 Nov. 2020), https://www.ecb.europa.eu/ecb-and-you/explainers/tell-me-more/html/anacredit.en.html; https://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/ecb_statistics/anacredit/html/index.en.html

EU Ombudsman (2011). The Europan Ombudsman’s guide to complaints, 1 Oct. 2011, https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/publication/en/11469

EU Ombudsman (2015). The Ombudsman asks the ECB about AnaCredit, Decision case 1693/2015/PD, 20.11.2015, EU Ombudsman, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/decision/en/62903

Case Law

Starr International Co. v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 906 F. Supp d 202, 237,US Supreme Court, https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2346&context=ypfs-documents

Della Negra F., Smits R. (2022).The Banking Union and Union Courts: an overview of cases as of 20 April 2022 Court judgments, the European Banking Institute (EBI), Frankfurt am Main, Germany; https://ebi-europa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/The-Banking-Union-and-Union-Courts-20-April-200--final-1.pdf




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP250312007D

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)