RISK PRIORITY EVALUATION OF POWER TRANSFORMER PARTS BASED ON HYBRID FMEA FRAMEWORK UNDER HESITANT FUZZY ENVIRONMENT

Bin Zhou, Jing Chen, Qun Wu, Dragan Pamučar, Weizhong Wang, Ligang Zhou

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME220223013Z
First page
399
Last page
420

Abstract


The power transformer is one of the most critical facilities in the power system, and its running status directly impacts the power system's security. It is essential to research the risk priority evaluation of the power transformer parts. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a methodology for analyzing the potential failure modes (FMs) within a system in various industrial devices. This study puts forward a hybrid FMEA framework integrating novel hesitant fuzzy aggregation tools and CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation) method. In this framework, the hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) are used to depict the uncertainty in risk evaluation. Then, an improved HFWA (hesitant fuzzy weighted averaging) operator is adopted to fuse risk evaluation for FMEA experts. This aggregation manner can consider different lengths of HFSs and the support degrees among the FMEA experts. Next, the novel HFWGA (hesitant fuzzy weighted geometric averaging) operator with CRITIC weights is developed to determine the risk priority of each FM. This method can satisfy the multiplicative characteristic of the RPN (risk priority number) method of the conventional FMEA model and reflect the correlations between risk indicators. Finally, a real example of the risk priority evaluation of power transformer parts is given to show the applicability and feasibility of the proposed hybrid FMEA framework. Comparison and sensitivity studies are also offered to verify the effectiveness of the improved risk assessment approach.


Keywords

Risk priority evaluation, Power transformer parts, Aggregation operator, CRITIC method, Hesitant fuzzy sets

Full Text:

PDF

References


Flores, W. C., Mombello, E., Jardini, J., Rattá, G., 2009, Fuzzy risk index for power transformer failures due to external short-circuits, Electric Power Systems Research, 79, pp. 539–549.

Gao, Z., Zhang, J., Guo, F., Zhou, Y., Guan, R., Huang, Y., 2021, An improved high-voltage high-frequency multi-winding transformer structure for anode power supply in ECRH, Fusion Engineering and Design, 172, 112899.

Foros, J., Istad, M., 2020, Health index, risk and remaining lifetime estimation of power transformers, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 35, pp. 2612–2620.

Liao, R., Bian, J., Yang, L., Grzybowski, S., 2013, Cloud model-based failure mode and effects analysis for prioritization of failures of power transformer in risk assessment, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, 23, pp. 1172–1190.

Widjajanto, S., Rimawan, E., 2021, Modified failure mode and effect analysis approaching to improve organization performance based on Baldrige criteria-A case study of an electro-medic industry, Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 4, pp. 39-58.

Wan, C., Yan, X., Zhang, D., Qu, Z., Yang, Z., 2019, An advanced fuzzy bayesian-based FMEA approach for assessing maritime supply chain risks, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, pp. 222–240.

Wang, L., Yan, F., Wang, F., Li, Z., 2021, FMEA-CM based quantitative risk assessment for process industries—case study of coal-to-methanol plant in China, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 149, pp. 299–311.

Qin, J., Xi, Y., Pedrycz, W., 2020, Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) for risk assessment based on interval type-2 fuzzy evidential reasoning method, Applied Soft Computing, 89, 106134.

Wang, W., Liu, X., Chen, X., Qin. Y., 2019, Risk assessment based on hybrid FMEA framework by considering decision maker’s psychological behavior character, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, pp. 516–527.

Zheng, L., He, Z., He, S., 2021, An integrated probabilistic graphic model and FMEA approach to identify product defects from social media data, Expert Systems with Applications, 178, 115030.

Bhattacharjee, P., Dey, V., Mandal, U., 2020, Risk assessment by failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) using an interval number based logistic regression model, Safety Science, 132, 104967.

Liu, H.-C., Chen, X.-Q., Duan, C.-Y., Wang, Y.-M., 2019, Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: A systematic literature review, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, pp. 981–897.

Huang, J., You, J.-X., Liu, H.-C., Song, M.-S., 2020, Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 199, 106885.

Gul, M., Yucesan, M., Celik, E., 2020, A manufacturing failure mode and effect analysis based on fuzzy and probabilistic risk analysis, Applied Soft Computing, 96, 106689.

Hassan, S., Wang, J., Kontovas, C., Bashir, M., 2022, Modified FMEA hazard identification for cross-country petroleum pipeline using Fuzzy rule base and approximate reasoning, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 74, 104616.

Liu, H.-C., You, J.-X., Duan, C.-Y., 2019, An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, International Journal of Production Economics, 207, pp. 163–172.

Wang, W., Jiang, W., Han, X., Liu, S., 2022, An extended gained and lost dominance score method based risk prioritization for Fine-Kinney model with interval type-2 fuzzy information, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 28, pp. 154-183.

Macura, D., Laketić, M., Pamučar, D., Marinković, D., 2022, Risk analysis model with interval type-2 fuzzy FMEA–Case study of railway infrastructure projects in the Republic of Serbia, Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 19, pp. 103–118.

Kushwaha, D. K., Panchal, D., Sachdeva, A., 2020, Risk analysis of cutting system under intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 1, pp. 162-173.

Wang, W., Liu, X., Liu, S., 2021, A hybrid evaluation method for human error probability by using extended DEMATEL with Z-numbers: A case of cargo loading operation, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 84, 103158.

Mete, S., 2019, Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 25, pp. 1645–1660.

Torra, V., 2010, Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 25, pp. 529–539.

Xia, M., Xu, Z., 2011, Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52, pp. 395–407.

Kayapinar Kaya, S., Erginel, N., 2020, Futuristic airport: A sustainable airport design by integrating hesitant fuzzy SWARA and hesitant fuzzy sustainable quality function deployment, Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 123880.

Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Pardasani, K. R., Mardani, A., 2019, A novel hesitant fuzzy WASPAS method for assessment of green supplier problem based on exponential information measures, Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117901.

Gong, J.-W., Liu. H.-C., You, X.-Y., Yin, L., 2021, An integrated multi-criteria decision making approach with linguistic hesitant fuzzy sets for E-learning website evaluation and selection, Applied Soft Computing, 102, 107118.

Wang, W., Liu, X., Qin, Y., Fu, Y., 2018, A risk evaluation and prioritization method for FMEA with prospect theory and Choquet integral, Safety Science, 110, pp. 152–163.

Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Palomares-Carrascosa, I., Zhou, H., 2019, Failure mode and effect analysis in a linguistic context: A consensus-based multiattribute group decision-making approach, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 68, pp. 566–582.

Wang, Z.-C., Yan, R., Chen, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, G., 2022, Group risk assessment in failure mode and effects analysis using a hybrid probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic MCDM method, Expert Systems with Applications, 188, 116013.

Huang, W., Zhang, Y., 2021, Railway dangerous goods transportation system risk assessment: An approach combining FMEA with pessimistic-optimistic fuzzy information axiom considering acceptable risk coefficient, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 70, pp. 371-388.

Huang, J., Xu, D.-H., Liu, H.-C., Song, M.-S., 2021, A new model for failure mode and effect analysis integrating linguistic Z-numbers and projection method, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 29, pp. 530–538.

Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Xiao, J., Chiclana, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., 2021, Consensus and opinion evolution-based failure mode and effect analysis approach for reliability management in social network and uncertainty contexts, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 208, 107425.

Shen, M., Liu, P., 2021, Risk assessment of logistics enterprises using FMEA under free double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic environments, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 20, pp. 1221–1259.

Jin, C., Ran, Y., Zhang, G., 2021, Interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy FMEA application to improve risk evaluation process of tool changing manipulator, Applied Soft Computing, 104, 107192.

Huang, G., Xiao, L., 2021, Failure mode and effect analysis: An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy cloud theory-based method, Applied Soft Computing, 98, 106834.

Liao, H., Long, Y., Tang, M., Streimikiene, D., Lev, B., 2019, Early lung cancer screening using double normalization-based multi-aggregation (DNMA) and Delphi methods with hesitant fuzzy information, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 136, pp. 453–463.

Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K., Kar, S., 2021, An extended fuzzy decision-making framework using hesitant fuzzy sets for the drug selection to treat the mild symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Applied Soft Computing, 103, 107155.

Liao, Z., Liao, H., Tang, M., Al-Barakati, A., Llopis-Albert, C., 2020, A Choquet integral-based hesitant fuzzy gained and lost dominance score method for multi-criteria group decision making considering the risk preferences of experts: Case study of higher business education evaluation, Information Fusion, 62, pp. 121–133.

Colak, M., Kaya, I., 2020, Multi-criteria evaluation of energy storage technologies based on hesitant fuzzy information: A case study for Turkey, Journal of Energy Storage, 28, 101211.

Deveci, M., Öner, S. C., Ciftci, M. E., Özcan, E., Pamučar, D., 2022, Interval type-2 hesitant fuzzy Entropy-based WASPAS approach for aircraft type selection, Applied Soft Computing, 114, 108076.

Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L., 1995, Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method, Computers & Operations Research, 22, pp. 763–770.

Lai, H., Liao, H., 2021, A multi-criteria decision making method based on DNMA and CRITIC with linguistic D numbers for blockchain platform evaluation, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 101, 104200.

Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., 2020, A novel plithogenic TOPSIS-CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119586.

Peng, X., Huang, H., 2020, Fuzzy decision making method based on CoCoSo with CRITIC for financial risk evaluation, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26, pp. 695–724.

Wu, Y., Deng, Z., Tao, Y., Wang, L., Liu, F., Zhou, J., 2021, Site selection decision framework for photovoltaic hydrogen production project using BWM-CRITIC-MABAC: A case study in Zhangjiakou, Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, 129233.

Žižović, M., Miljković, B., Marinković, D., 2020, Objective methods for determining criteria weight coefficients: A modification of the CRITIC method, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3, pp. 149-161.

Wu, P., Zhou, L., Chen, H., Tao, Z., 2019, Additive consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation with a new expansion principle for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 27, pp. 716-730.

Wu, Q., Lin, W., Zhou, L., Chen, Y., Chen, H., 2019, Enhancing multiple attribute group decision making flexibility based on information fusion technique and hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, pp. 954–970.

Cicek, K., Celik, M., 2013, Application of failure modes and effects analysis to main engine crankcase explosion failure on-board ship, Safety Science, 51, pp. 6–10.

Guo, J., Lin, Z., Zu, L., Chen, J., 2019, Failure modes and effects analysis for CO2 transmission pipelines using a hesitant fuzzy VIKOR method, Soft Computing, 23, pp. 10321–10338.

Liu, Y., Shen, G. T., Zhao, Z. Y., Wu, Z. W., 2019, Risk assessment of failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) under hesitant fuzzy information, Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 61, pp. 214–221.

Wang, W., Liu, X., Qin, J., Liu, S., 2019, An extended generalized TODIM for risk evaluation and prioritization of failure modes considering risk indicators interaction, IISE Transactions, 51, pp. 1236–1250.

Xu, Z., Xia, M., 2011, Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets, Information Sciences, 181, pp. 2128–2138.

Chen, Y., Ran, Y., Wang, Z., Li, X., Yang, X., Zhang, G., 2020, An extended MULTIMOORA method based on OWGA operator and Choquet integral for risk prioritization identification of failure modes, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 91, 103605.

Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Canıtez, F., Bozanic, D., 2020, A fuzzy Full Consistency Method-Dombi-Bonferroni model for prioritizing transportation demand management measures, Applied Soft Computing, 87, 105952.

Wu, Q., Zhou, L., Chen, Y., Chen, H., 2019, An integrated approach to green supplier selection based on the interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst and extended VIKOR methods, Information Sciences, 502, pp. 394–417.

Wu, Q., Liu, X., Qin, J., Wang, W., Zhou, L., 2021, A linguistic distribution behavioral multi-criteria group decision making model integrating extended generalized TODIM and quantum decision theory, Applied Soft Computing, 98, 106757.

Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Deveci, M., 2021, Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology, Science of The Total Environment, 788, 147763.

Wu, Q., Liu, X., Qin, J., Zhou, L., 2021, Multi-criteria group decision-making for portfolio allocation with consensus reaching process under interval type-2 fuzzy environment, Information Sciences, 570, pp. 668–688.

Pamucar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., Božanić, D., 2021, A new logarithm methodology of additive weights (LMAW) for multi-criteria decision-making: Application in logistics, Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19, pp. 361-380.

Deveci, M., Simic, V., Karagoz, S., Antucheviciene, J., 2022, An interval type-2 fuzzy sets based Delphi approach to evaluate site selection indicators of sustainable vehicle shredding facilities, Applied Soft Computing, 118, 108465.

Zulqarnain, R. M., Siddique, I., Ali, R., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Bozanic, D., 2021, Robust aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy hypersoft set with their application to solve MCDM problem, Entropy, 23, 688.

Blagojević, A., Stević, Ž., Marinković, D., Kasalica, S., Rajilić, S., 2020, A novel entropy-fuzzy PIPRECIA-DEA model for safety evaluation of railway traffic, Symmetry, 12, 1479.

Vesković, S., Stević, Ž., Stojić, G., Vasiljević, M., Milinković, S., 2018, Evaluation of the railway management model by using a new integrated model DELPHI-SWARA-MABAC, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1, pp. 34-50.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME220223013Z

Refbacks



ISSN: 0354-2025 (Print)

ISSN: 2335-0164 (Online)

COBISS.SR-ID 98732551

ZDB-ID: 2766459-4