EVALUATION OF GREEN ENERGY SOURCES: AN EXTENDED FUZZY-TODIM APPROACH BASED ON SCHWEIZER-SKLAR AND POWER AVERAGING OPERATORS
Abstract
To address the problem of green energy source selection, this paper proposes a novel decision-making framework using fuzzy-TOmada de Decisao Interativa Multicriterio (TODIM) method in an interval-valued intuitionistic environment. The proposed framework integrates the prospect theory approach with Schweizer-Sklar and power averaging operators to evaluate the green energy sources including solid waste, solar, tidal, carbon capture storage, hydrogen, marine, hydel, biogas, wind, concentrating solar, geothermal and biomass under the influence of nine conflicting criteria such as annual generation, capacity factor, mitigation potential, useful life, installation period, energy requirement, CO2 emission, generating cost and operations and maintenance cost. The vagueness associated with the evaluations as well as biased evaluations is taken care of by Schweizer-Sklar and power averaging operators while TODIM method provides due consideration to the psychological behavior of the decision maker. Solar photovoltaic emerges as the best energy source. Sensitivity analysis has also been performed to assess the robustness of the proposed decision-making framework.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Stojčić, M., Stjepanović A., Stjepanović, Đ., 2019, ANFIS model for the prediction of generated electricity of photovoltaic modules, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), pp. 35-48.
Ghenai, C., Albawab, M., Bettayeb, M., 2020, Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method, Renewable Energy, 146, pp. 580-597.
Worighi, I., Maach, A., Hafid, A., Hegazy, O., Van Mierlo, J., 2019, Integrating renewable energy in smart grid system: Architecture, virtualization and analysis, Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 18, 100226.
Kizielewicz, B., Sałabun, W., 2024, SITW method: A new approach to re-identifying multi-criteria weights in complex decision analysis, Spectrum of Mechanical Engineering and Operational Research, 1(1), pp. 215-226.
Deveci, M., Erdogan, N., Pamucar, D., Kucuksari, S., Cali, U., 2023, A rough Dombi Bonferroni based approach for public charging station type selection, Applied Energy, 345, 121258.
Gökmener, S., Oğuz, E., Deveci, M., & Göllü, K., 2023, Site selection for floating photovoltaic system on dam reservoirs using sine trigonometric decision-making model, Ocean Engineering, 281, 114820.
Deveci, M., 2023, Effective use of artificial intelligence in healthcare supply chain resilience using fuzzy decision-making model, Soft Computing, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-08906-2
Ghailani, H., Zaidan, A. A., Qahtan, S., Alsattar, H. A., Al-Emran, M., Deveci, M., Delen, D., 2023, Developing sustainable management strategies in construction and demolition wastes using a q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set-based decision modelling approach, Applied Soft Computing, 110606.
Haralambopoulos, D.A., Polatidis, H., 2003, Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework, Renewable Energy, 28(6), pp. 961-973.
Nigim, K., Munier, N., Green, J., 2004, Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources, Renewable Energy, 29(11), pp. 1775-1791.
Pohekar, S.D., Ramachandran, M., 2004, Multi-criteria evaluation of cooking energy alternatives for promoting parabolic solar cooker in India, Renewable Energy, 29(9), pp. 1449-1460.
Patlitzianas, K.D., Ntotas, K., Doukas, H., Psarras, J., 2007, Assessing the renewable energy producers’ environment in EU accession member states, Energy Conversion and Management, 48(3), pp. 890-897.
Buchholz, T., Rametsteiner, E., Volk, T.A., Luzadis, V.A., 2009, Multi criteria analysis for bioenergy systems assessments, Energy Policy, 37(2), pp. 484-495.
Cavallaro, F., 2009, Multi-criteria decision aid to assess concentrated solar thermal technologies, Renewable Energy, 34(7), pp. 1678-1685.
Chung, E.S., Lee, K.S., 2009, Prioritization of water management for sustainability using hydrologic simulation model and multicriteria decision making techniques, Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), pp. 1502-1511.
Doukas, H., Psarras, J., 2009, A linguistic decision support model towards the promotion of renewable energy, Energy Sources, Part B, 4(2), pp. 166-178.
Kahraman, C., Cebi, S., Kaya, I., 2010, Selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design: The case of Turkey, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16(1), pp. 82-102.
Ren, H., Gao, W., Zhou, W., Nakagami, K.I., 2009, Multi-criteria evaluation for the optimal adoption of distributed residential energy systems in Japan, Energy Policy, 37(12), pp. 5484-5493.
Tsoutsos, T., Drandaki, M., Frantzeskaki, N., Iosifidis, E., Kiosses, I., 2009, Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete, Energy Policy, 37(5), pp. 1587-1600.
Heo, E., Kim, J., Boo, K.J., 2010., Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(8), pp. 2214-2220.
Kaya, T., Kahraman, C., 2010, Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul, Energy, 35(6), pp. 2517-2527.
Shen, Y.C., Lin, G.T., Li, K.P., Yuan, B.J., 2010, An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology, Energy Policy, 38(8), pp. 4604-4616.
Reza, B., Sadiq, R., Hewage, K., 2011, Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis, Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), pp. 2053-2066.
San Cristóbal, J.R., 2011, Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The VIKOR method, Renewable Energy, 36(2), pp. 498-502.
Davoudpour, H., Rezaee, S., Ashrafi, M., 2012, Developing a framework for renewable technology portfolio selection: A case study at a R&D center, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(6), pp. 4291-4297.
Shiue, Y.C., Lin, C.Y., 2012, Applying analytic network process to evaluate the optimal recycling strategy in upstream of solar energy industry, Energy and Buildings, 54, pp. 266-277.
Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Krisciukaitienė, I., Balezentis, A., 2012, Prioritizing sustainable electricity production technologies: MCDM approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), pp. 3302-3311.
Balezentiene, L., Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., 2013, Fuzzy decision support methodology for sustainable energy crop selection, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 17, pp. 83-93.
Ertay, T., Kahraman, C., Kaya, İ., 2013, Evaluation of renewable energy alternatives using MACBETH and fuzzy AHP multicriteria methods: the case of Turkey, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 19(1), pp. 38-62.
Kurka, T., Blackwood, D., 2013, Selection of MCA methods to support decision making for renewable energy developments, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27, pp. 225-233.
Yazdani-Chamzini, A., Fouladgar, M.M., Zavadskas, E.K., Moini, S.H., 2013, Selecting the optimal renewable energy using multi criteria decision making, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(5), pp. 957-978.
Kabak, M., Dağdeviren, M., 2014, Prioritization of renewable energy sources for Turkey by using a hybrid MCDM methodology, Energy Conversion and Management, 79, pp. 25-33.
Kucukvar, M., Gumus, S., Egilmez, G., Tatari, O., 2014, Ranking the sustainability performance of pavements: An intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making method, Automation in Construction, 40, pp. 33-43.
Troldborg, M., Heslop, S., Hough, R.L., 2014, Assessing the sustainability of renewable energy technologies using multi-criteria analysis: Suitability of approach for national-scale assessments and associated uncertainties, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, pp. 1173-1184.
Kuleli Pak, B., Albayrak, Y.E., Erensal, Y.C., 2015, Renewable energy perspective for Turkey using sustainability indicators, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8(1), pp. 187-197.
Ren, J., Sovacool, B.K., 2015, Prioritizing low-carbon energy sources to enhance China’s energy security, Energy Conversion and Management, 92, pp. 129-136.
Şengül, Ü., Eren, M., Shiraz, S.E., Gezder, V., Şengül, A.B., 2015, Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey, Renewable Energy, 75, pp. 617-625.
Al Garni, H., Kassem, A., Awasthi, A., Komljenovic, D., Al-Haddad, K., 2016, A multicriteria decision making approach for evaluating renewable power generation sources in Saudi Arabia, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 16, pp. 137-50.
Büyüközkan, G., Güleryüz, S., 2016, An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey, International Journal of Production Economics, 182, pp. 435-448.
Büyüközkan, G., Güleryüz, S., 2017, Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey using an integrated MCDM approach with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations, Energy, 123, pp. 149-163.
Çolak, M., Kaya, İ., 2017, Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 80, pp. 840-853.
Haddad, B., Liazid, A., Ferreira, P., 2017, A multi-criteria approach to rank renewables for the Algerian electricity system, Renewable Energy, 107, pp. 462-472.
Bhowmik, C., Bhowmik, S., Ray, A., 2018, The effect of normalization tools on green energy sources selection using multi-criteria decision-making approach: A case study in India, Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 10(6), 065901.
Lee, H., & Chang, C. (2018). Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 92, pp. 883-896.
Ghenai, C., Albawab, M., & Bettayeb, M. (2020). Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method, Renewable Energy, 146, pp. 580-597.
Qazi, A., Bhowmik, C., Hussain, F., Yang, S., Naseem, U., Adebayo, A.A., Gumaei, A., Al-Rakhami, M., 2021, Analyzing the Public Opinion as a Guide for Renewable-Energy Status in Malaysia: A Case Study, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(2), pp. 371-385.
Bhowmik, C., Bhowmik, S., Ray, A., 2021, Selection of optimum green energy sources by considering environmental constructs and their technical criteria: a case study, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, pp. 13890-13918.
Yürek, Y.T., Bulut, M., Özyörük, B., Özcan, E., 2021, Evaluation of the hybrid renewable energy sources using sustainability index under uncertainty, Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 28, 100527.
Salameh, T., Sayed, E.T., Abdelkareem, M.A., Olabi, A.G., Rezk, H., 2021, Optimal selection and management of hybrid renewable energy System: Neom city as a case study, Energy Conversion and Management, 244, 114434.
da Ponte, G.P., Calili, R.F., Souza, R.C., 2021, Energy generation in Brazilian isolated systems: Challenges and proposals for increasing the share of renewables based on a multicriteria analysis, Energy for Sustainable Development, 61, pp. 74-88.
Sarkodie, W.O., Ofosu, E.A., Ampimah, B.C., 2022, Decision optimization techniques for evaluating renewable energy resources for power generation in Ghana: MCDM approach, Energy Reports, 8, pp. 13504-13513.
Akçaba, S., Eminer, F., 2022, Evaluation of strategic energy alternatives determined for Northern Cyprus with SWOT based MCDM integrated approach, Energy Reports, 8, pp. 11022-11038.
Al-Barakati, A., Mishra, A.R., Mardani, A., Rani, P., 2022, An extended interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy WASPAS method based on new similarity measures to evaluate the renewable energy sources, Applied Soft Computing, 120, 108689.
Krishankumar, R., Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Aggarwal, M., Ravichandran, K.S., 2022, Assessment of renewable energy sources for smart cities’ demand satisfaction using multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic based choquet integral approach, Renewable Energy, 189, pp. 1428-1442.
Bączkiewicz, A., 2023, Temporal SWARA-SPOTIS for Multi-Criteria Assessment of European Countries Regarding Sustainable RES Exploitation, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 471, pp. 171-191.
Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Sałabun, W., 2022, New multi-criteria method for evaluation of sustainable RES management, Applied Energy, 324, 119695.
Quteishat, A., Younis, M.A.A., 2023, Strategic Renewable Energy Resource Selection Using a Fuzzy Decision-Making Method, Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, 35(2), pp. 2117-2134.
Bączkiewicz, A., Wątróbski, J., 2022, Multi-Criteria Temporal Assessment of Afordable and Clean Energy Systems in European Countries Using the DARIA-TOPSIS Method, Procedia Computer Science, 207, pp. 4442-4453.
Petrović, G., Mihajlović, J., Ćojbašić, Z., Madić, M., Marinković, D., 2019, Comparison of three fuzzy mcdm methods for solving the supplier selection problem, Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering, 17(3), pp. 455-469.
Zindani, D., Maity, S.R., Bhowmik, S., 2020, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TODIM method based on Schweizer–Sklar power aggregation operators and their applications to group decision making, Soft Computing, 24, pp. 14091-14133.
Zindani, D., Maity, S.R., Bhowmik, S., 2021, Complex interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy TODIM approach and its application to group decision making, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 12(2), pp. 2079-2102.
Mishra, A.R., Rani, P., 2018, Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy WASPAS method: application in reservoir flood control management policy, Group Decision and Negotiation, 27(6), pp. 1047-1078.
Hamad, T.A., Agll, A.A., Hamad, Y.M., Sheffield, J.W., 2014, Solid waste as renewable source of energy: current and future possibility in Libya, Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 4, pp. 144-152.
Hasan, M.M., Rasul, M.G., Khan, M.M.K., Ashwath, N., Jahirul, M.I., 2021, Energy recovery from municipal solid waste using pyrolysis technology: A review on current status and developments, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 145, 111073.
Siksnelyte-Butkiene, I., Zavadskas, E.K., Streimikiene, D., 2020, Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) for the Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Household: A Review, Energies, 13(5), 1164.
Chowdhury, M.M.U., Rahman, K.M., Selvanathan, V., Nuthammachot, N., Ramamurthi, K., Mostafaeipour, A., Habib, A., Akhtaruzzaman, Amin, N., Techato, K., 2021, Current trends and prospects of tidal energy technology, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(6), pp. 8179-8194.
Bandilla, K.W., 2020, Carbon Capture and Storage, Future Energy (Third Edition), Elsevier, pp. 669-692.
Dehshiri, S.J.H., Zanjirchi, S.M., 2022, Comparative analysis of multicriteria decision‐making approaches for evaluation hydrogen projects development from wind energy, International Journal of Energy Research, 46(10), pp. 13356-13376.
Shao, M., Zhang, S., Sun, J., Han, Z., Shao, Z., Yi, C., 2022, GIS-MCDM-Based Approach to Site Selection of Wave Power Plants for Islands in China, Energies, 15(11), 4118.
Bhowmik, C., Dhar, S., Ray, A., 2019, Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for the evaluation of optimum green energy sources: A case study, International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 11(4), pp. 1-28.
Bazmi, A. A., Zahedi, G., 2011, Sustainable energy systems: Role of optimization modeling techniques in power generation and supply - A review, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(8), pp. 3480-3500.
Lenzen, M. (2010). Current state of development of electricity-generating technologies: A literature review, Energies, 3(3), pp. 462-591.
Eroğlu, Ö., Aktaş Potur, E., Kabak, M., Gencer, C., 2023, A literature review: Wind energy within the scope of MCDM methods, Gazi University Journal of Science, 36(4), pp. 1578-1599.
Rezk, H., Mukhametzyanov, I.Z., Abdelkareem, M.A., Salameh, T., Sayed, E.T., Maghrabie, H.M., Radwan, A., Wilberforce, T., Elsaid, K., Olabi, A.G., 2022, Multi-criteria decision making for different concentrated solar thermal power technologies, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 52, 102118.
Raos, S., Hranić, J., Rajšl, I., Bär, K., 2022, An extended methodology for multi-criteria decision-making process focused on enhanced geothermal systems, Energy Conversion and Management, 258, 115253.
Bhowmik, C., Kaviani, M.A., Ray, A., Ocampo, L., 2020, An Integrated Entropy-TOPSIS Methodology for Evaluating Green Energy Sources, International Journal of Business Analytics, 7(3), pp. 44-70.
Mishra, A.R., Rani, P., Mardani, A., Pardasani, K.R., Govindan, K., Alrasheedi, M., 2020, Healthcare evaluation in hazardous waste recycling using novel interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information based on complex proportional assessment method, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 139, 106140.
Bozanic, D., Tešić, D., Marinković, D., Milić, A., 2021, Modeling of neuro-fuzzy system as a support in decision-making processes, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 2(1), pp. 222-234.
Bozanic, D., Tešić, D., Komazec, N., Marinković, D., Puška, A., 2023, Interval fuzzy AHP method in risk assessment, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 4(1), pp. 131-140.
Biswas, S., Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., Marinković, D. 2023, A spherıcal fuzzy based decısıon makıng framework wıth eınsteın aggregatıon for comparıng preparedness of SMEs ın Qualıty 4.0, Facta Universitatis-Series Mechanical Engineering, 21(3), pp. 453-478.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0354-2025 (Print)
ISSN: 2335-0164 (Online)
COBISS.SR-ID 98732551
ZDB-ID: 2766459-4