APPLICABILITY ANALYSIS OF ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES IN THE FABRICATION OF ANATOMICALLY SHAPED LATTICE SCAFFOLDS

Jelena Milovanović, Miloš Stojković, Miroslav Trajanović

DOI Number
-
First page
295
Last page
305

Abstract


Manufacturing of anatomically shaped scaffolds for bonе tissue recovery as well as other similar anatomically shaped implants represents a major challenge for modern manufacturing technologies. The complexity of anatomically shaped lattice scaffolds for bone tissue recovery requires involvement of so-called additive manufacturing processes.

This paper brings out the criterial matrix for the assessment of additive manufacturing processes applicability in the case of bone tissue scaffold manufacturing. Moreover, this criterial matrix serves as the basis for developing Calculator for the generic assessment of additive manufacturing processes applicability. In this very particular case the subject of consideration is an anatomically shaped lattice scaffold intended for the recovery of large trauma located in the upper part of proximal diaphyseal of rabbit tibia. The criterial matrix and the Calculator defined for this case prove themselves as generic tools for comparative analyses of applicability of different additive manufacturing processes. Furthermore, these tools can help identifying the most demanded features of some future additive manufacturing process that has to be developed for the specific case.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Chen, Q. Z., Rezwan, K., Armitage, D., Nazhat, S. N, Boccaccini, A. R., 2006, The surface functionalization of 45S5 Bioglass -based glass-ceramic scaffolds and its impact on bioactivity, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 17(11), pp. 979-987.

Stojkovic, M., Korunovic, N., Trajanovic, M., Milovanovic, J., Trifunovic, M., Vitkovic, N., 2013, Design study of anatomically shaped lattice scaffolds for the bone tissue recovery, SEECCM III 3nd South-East European Conference on Computational Mechanics an ECCOMAS and IACM Special Interest Conference, Kos, Greece, p. S2065.

Mellor, S., Hao, L., Zhang, D., 2014, Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation, International Journal of Production Economics, 149, pp. 194-201.

Ivanova, O., Williams, C., Campbell, T., 2013, Additive manufacturing (AM) and nanotechnology: promises and challenges, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 19(5), pp. 353 – 364.

Korosec, M., Balic, J., Kopac, J., 2005, Neural network based manufacturability evaluation of free form machining, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 45(1), pp. 13-20.

Kuzman, K., Nardin, B., 2004, Determination of manufacturing technologies in mould manufacturing, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 157-158, pp. 573-577.

Pessard E., Mognol P., Hascoet J.Y., Gerometta C., 2008, Complex cast parts with rapid tooling: rapid manufacturing point of view, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39(9), pp. 898-904.

Kerbrat, O., Mognol, P., Hascoet, J. Y., 2008, Manufacturing complexity evaluation for additive and subtractive processes: application to hybrid modular tooling, 19th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, Austin, USA.

Bose, S., Vahabzadeh, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., 2014, Bone tissue engineering using 3D printing, Materials Today, 16(12), pp. 496-504.

Milovanović, J., 2014, Application of Additive Technologies in Fabrication of Anatomical Custom Made Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Reconstruction, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering University of Nis, Serbia, 274 p.

Gupta, S. K., Regli, W. C., Das, D., Nau, D. S., 1995, Automated manufacturability analysis: A survey, Research in Engineering Design, 9(3), pp. 168-190.

Giachetti , R. E., Jurrens, K. K., 1997, Manufacturing Evaluation Of Designs: A Knowledge-Based Approach, Proceedings of the Third Joint Conference of Information Sciences (JCIS), pp. 194-197.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0354-2025 (Print)

ISSN: 2335-0164 (Online)

COBISS.SR-ID 98732551

ZDB-ID: 2766459-4