AUTONOMY SUPPORT, CONTROLLED COACHING STYLES AND SKILLS DEVELOPMENT IN WATER POLO

Marijana Mladenović, Nenad Trunic, Marko Djurovic, Dijana Vucic

DOI Number
-
First page
341
Last page
349

Abstract


. Self-determination theory suggests that a coach’s behavior can be viewed in terms of two interpesonal styles: autonomy supportive and controlling. This study was carried out in order to reveal possible connection between coaching styles and improvement in water polo sports practice. During three months period, two experimental groups of young male athletes practicing water polo (each N=10), age ranged 5 to 12, were under special coaching treatment (autonomy supportive or controlled). Autonomy supportive style exibits taking the athletes perspective and providing explanatory rationales when prescribing action, provide much choice as possible in the situation. Controlled coaching style means assigning tasks and activities without the input of the subordinates, showing little interest in how athletes see things, and assuming mantle of infallibility and imperviousness to questioning. Before, and at the end of experimental period, athletes from both groups were measured for speed swimming, and have been graded for performing on two water polo techniques. Age of each participant and experience in water polo practice were taken into account. M, SD, t-test, Anova and correlation analysis were applied. Statistical analysis revealed that both groups of young athletes made statistically significant improvement, although there is no statistical significance between groups. It can be said that sports trainging itself, made improvement of performance in given tests. But, there are some indications that acquisition of speed performance is more suited with controlled coaching style, while autonomy supportivness is providing better climate for developing water polo techniques.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alvarez, M.S., Balaguer, I., Castillo, I. & Duda, J. (2009). Coach Autonomy Support and Quality of Sport Engagement in Youth Soccer Players. Spanish Journal of Psyhology, 12 (1), 138-148.

Bartholomew, K.J., Ntoumanis, N. & Thogersen-Ntoumani, C. (2010). The Controlling Interpersonal Style in a Coaching Context: Development and Initial Validation of a Psychometric Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32, 193-216.

Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of Goal Pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

Kalaja, S., Jaakkola, T., Watt, A., Liukkonen, J., Ommundsen, Y. (2009). The association between seventh grade Finnish students' motivational climate, perceived competence, self-determined motivation and fundamental movement skills. European Physical Education Review, 15 (3), 315-335. DOI: 10.1177/1356336X09364714

Lim, B.S.C. & Wang, C.K.J. (2009). Perceived Autonomy Support, Behavioral Regulations in Physical Education and Physical Activity Intention. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 52-60. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.06.003

Mladenovic, M. (2009). The link of causal orientations and perceptions of basic psychological needs with the motivational approaches of sports coaches. Sport – Science and Practice, 1 (1), 15-28.

Mladenovic, M. (2010a). The link of a coach's perception of locus of control and his/her approach to athlets. SportLogia, 6 (2), 34-41. doi: 10.5550/sgia.1002035

Mladenovic, M. (2010b). The structure of sports motivation and the perception of a coach's approach to athlets. Sport – Science and Practice, 1 (2), 131-143.

Pelletier, L.G., Fortier, M.S., Vallerand, R.J., & Briere, N.M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 279–306.

Ryan, R. M. & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining the Reasons for Acting in Two Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57 (5), 749–761.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E.L. Deci & R.M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Sheldon, K.M. & Watson, A. (2011). Coach’s Autonomy Support is Especially Important for Varsity Compared to Club and Recreational Athletes. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 6 (1), 109-123.

Taylor, I.M., Ntoumanis, N. & Smith, B. (2009). The Social Context as a determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 235-243. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2008.09.002

Vallerand, R.J. & Losier, G.F. (1999) An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142–169.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN   1451-740X (Print)

ISSN   2406-0496 (Online)