ENGLISH L2 DEFINITE ARTICLE INSTRUCTION AT THE SERBIAN L1 TERTIARY LEVEL

Marta Veličković

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUTLTE1902197V
First page
197
Last page
210

Abstract


The study has two main goals: to assess in part the effects of current definite article instruction at the tertiary level in the Serbian L1/English L2 environment, and to analyze whether the use of the definite article in English could be represented by figure/ground alignment in the instruction process. One of the questionnaires used (consisting of fill-in-the-blank tasks) was meant to rate the participants’ L2 definite article production in the contexts for its obligatory use. Another questionnaire consisted of illustrations of figure/ground alignment as cues for a translation task meant to assess whether the definite article would be used in situations where the referent of choice was presented as the figure. An analysis of the data indicated that the participants, who displayed various levels of knowledge of definite article use on the first questionnaire, scored identical (successful) results when establishing a link between the use of the definite article and figure/ground alignment. These results could prove useful for innovating the L2 instruction process in the Serbian L1/English L2 environment.


Keywords

the definite article, Serbian L1, contexts for the obligatory use of the definite article, figure/ground alignment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Christophersen, P. (1939). The articles: a study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

Croft, W., and D. A. Cruse. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.

Diessel, H. (2004). The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 105]. Cambridge: CUP.

Diessel, H. (2006). Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17 (4), 463-489.

Djordjević, R. (1989). Engleski i srpskohrvatski jezik: Kontrastivna gramatika imeničke grupe. Beograd: Naučna knjiga.

Eastwood, J. (1999). Oxford practice grammar. Oxford: OUP.

Epstein, R. (2001). The definite article, accessibility, and the construction of discourse referents. Cognitive linguistics 12 (4), 333-378.

Farkas, D., & H. de Swart. (2007). Article choice in plural generics. Lingua 117, 1657-1676.

Grundy, P. (2004). The figure/ground Gestalt and language teaching methodology. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (eds.). Cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching (pp. 119-142). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Hawkins, J. A. (1978). Definiteness and indefiniteness: a study in reference and grammaticality predictions. London: Croom Helm.

Huddleston, R. & G. K. Pullum (eds.). (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.

Ionin, T. (2008). An experimental investigation of the semantics and pragmatics of specificity. In N. Abner & J. Bishop (eds.). Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 229-237). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. (2009). Article use and generic reference: parallels between L1- and L2-acquisition. In M. Garcia-Mayo & R. Hawkins (Eds.). Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 147-173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Jespersen, O. (1943). A modern English grammar on historical principles, Part 7: Syntax. Completed and edited by Niels Haislund. London: George Allen and Unwin; Copenhagen: Munksgaard.

Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume II, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.). Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 66-88). New York/London: Routledge.

Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: CUP.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York/London: Routledge.

Master, P. (1997). The English article system: acquisition, function and pedagogy. System 25(2), 215–232.

Quirk, R.., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (Eds.) (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London/New York: Longman.

Talmy L. (1978). Figure and Ground in complex sentences. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.). Universals of human language. Vol. 4. Syntax (pp. 625-649). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, vol 1. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive grammar. Oxford: OUP.

Thomson, A. J. & Martinet, A. V. (2004). A practical English grammar. 4th edition. Oxford: OUP.

Trenkić, D. (2002). Establishing the definiteness status of referents in dialogue (in languages with and without articles). Working papers in English and applied linguistics 7, 107-131.

Trenkić, D. (2004). Definiteness in Serbian/Croatian/Bosnian and some implications for the general structure of the nominal phrase. Lingua 114, 1401-1427.

Trenkić, D. (2009). Accounting for patterns of article omission and substitutions in second language production. In M. Garcia-Mayo & R. Hawkins (Eds.). Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 115-143). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ungerer, F., & Schmid, H. (1986). An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Addison Wesley Longman.

Veličković, M. (2018). Using think aloud protocols to assess the use of the definite article with Serbian students of English. Facta Universitatis: Series Linguistics and Literature 16(2), 133-156.

Verspoor, M. Using metaphors in teaching English articles. In C. Juchem-Grundmann & S. Niemeier (Eds.) To appear. KNOWING IS SEEING: Metaphor and language pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

White, B. J. (2010). In search of systematicity: A conceptual framework for the English article system. Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Publishing, ProQuest.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUTLTE1902197V

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2560 – 4600 (Print)
ISSN 2560 – 4619 (Online)