ECOLOGICAL SECURITY IN MAJDANPEK MINING AREA – A CASE STUDY
Abstract
Ecological security, at the local and global levels, is becoming one of the priority tasks of modern civilization. Contemporary world is facing many challenges, among which environmental problems have occupied most of the world's attention. Environmental protection is an unavoidable factor of internal stability and security of a country, so it is necessary to discover which factors threaten the environment and have an impact on ecological security. Mining activities have adverse effects on ecological security which, as a consequence, raises the necessity for continuous environmental monitoring in these areas. One of these areas is the municipality of Majdanpek in Serbia, where the principal part of inhabitants is employed in mining. This paper presents a case study on ecological security in the municipality of Majdanpek, through a subjective perception of the inhabitants’ safety and vulnerability in terms of four key indicators: water, air, soil and biodiversity.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Cherry, W. A. (1995): What is Ecological Security? Peace Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 87 - 89.
Todić, D., Vukasović, V. (2002): The ecological crisis in the world and the response of the international community. Belgrade: Federal Secretariat for Labor, Health and Social Welfare, Sector for the Environment, 2002, str. 4 – 5.
Rogers, S. K. (1997): Ecological Security and Multinational Corporations, pp. 29 – 36. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
Bakrač, S., Vuruna, M., Milanović, M. (2010): Environmental degradation - the impact on ecological security. Military Work. Vol. 62, No. 3, str. 314 – 328.
Buzan, B. (1990): People, States & Fear: An Agenda for International Securities Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd edition. London: Pearson Education Limited, 1991, рр. 115 – 130; Barry Buzan, Kelstrup Morten, Pierre Lemaitre, Elzbieta Tomer & Ole Wæver, The European Security Order Recast – Scenarios for the Post-Cold War Era. London: Pinter.
Barnett, J. (2001): The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security ERA. London and New York: Zed Books, pp. 15-25.
Ilić Krstić, I. (2016): « Socio-ecological security, sustainable development and quality of life », Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Occupational Safety in Niš, 2016. god. http://www.znrfak.ni.ac.rs/SERBIAN/014-02-OTDOC DoktorskeDisertacije.html
Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L, Bello, P. (1999): National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. –Ecological Economics 29: 375-390.
Tian, L., Zhang, Q. F., Zhang, X.et al. (2015): Assessment of ecological sustainability in the northwest region based on an improved ecological footprint model. –Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment 29(8): 76-81.
Peng, J., Wu, J. S., Pan, Y. J. et al. (2012): Evaluation for regional ecological sustainability based on PSR model: a conceptual framework. –Progress in Geography 31(7): 933-940.
Parris, T. M., Kates, R. W. (2003): Characterizing a sustainability transition: Goals, targets, trends, and driving forces. USA. – Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100(14): 8068-8073.
Monfreda, C.(2004): Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biocapacity assessments. –Land Use Policy 21: 231-246.
Census of Population, Households and Housing 2011 in the Republic of Serbia: Nationality. Belgrade: Republic Institute for Statistics, 2012, pp. 70-71.
Local Economic Development Strategy of Majdanpek Municipality 2010 - 2014, "Official Gazette of Majdanpek Municipality", II, no. 16, 24 December 2009, pp. 1-88.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUWLEP2001065I
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 0354-804X (Print)
ISSN 2406-0534 (Online)