A NEW FUNCTION OF PRISON INDUSTRY AND PRIVATE PRISONS IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF THEIR IMPLEMENTATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Emil Turković

DOI Number
10.22190/FULP1704347T
First page
347
Last page
360

Abstract


In the 1990s, various countries had a different approach to the problems related to prisoners’ labor. In the United States, the concept of prison labor could survive only in such developed states as New York, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts which could cope with the burden of keeping unproductive prisons. Under the impact of the penal reform and upon the adoption of new penal legislation in these states, the old American tradition of labor prisons gave way to a new standard which implied that convicted offenders had to learn different crafts while in prison but they were excluded from the public labor market when at large. The new industrial program, which was thus engendered, has significantly contributed to spreading the reformist functions of prison labor. Organized prison labor had always been strongly supported by penal reformers in the north of the United States but, in the mid-1980s, as the penal reformers moved away from that part of the United States, the concept of organized prison labor no longer had a significant political and legislative impact. The influence of penal reformers and the idea of instituting convict labor (but without competition in the labor market) had a strong influence on government politicians both at the federal and state government levels. The reformers endeavored to ensure the prisoners’ welfare and enable all prisoners to work and participate in the labor market as competitive workforce, both by leasing their labor and through the sale of final products on the free market.

Keywords

prisoners’ labor, unproductive prisons, prisoners’ welfare, competitive workforce

Full Text:

PDF

References


Busse, M., Brown, S.(2003). "Trade and investment effects of forced labor: An empirical assessment", International Labour Review, Vol. 142, No. 1; ProQuest Education Journals, p. 49-71;

Chang, F., Tracy H., Douglas E. Thompkins.(2002). Corporations Go to Prisons: The Expansion of Corporate Power and the Correctional Industry, Labor Studies Journal, Volume 27, Number 1, pp. 45-69 (Article) Published by West Virginia University Press;

Field, Joseph E.(1987). Making Private Prisons: An Improper Delegation of the Governmental Power, Hofstra Law Review, number 15, 3 review, article 8;

Gran, Brian; Henry, William. (2008). Holding private prisons accountable: A socio-legal analysis of "contracting out" prisons, social justice, USA, p. 1-9, 21, 54, 93, 180;

Greene, Robert William.(1977) Early Development of the Illinois State Penitentiary System, Illinois, USA, p. 1-9;

Gillin John Lewis.(1929). Criminology and Penology V2: New York, p: 234-236;

Hedges Chris (2013).The Business of Mass Incarceration; Truthdig. pp 130;

McKelvey, Blake. (1934). Prison Labor Problem: 1875-1900, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Volume 25, p: 267-270;

Reynolds, Morgan O. (1994). Using the private sector to deter crime, National Center for Policy Analysis, Dallas-Texas, USA, pp. 33-52;

Smith Adam (2005).An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, AN Electronic classics series publication of The Pennsylvania State University, p: 10;

Wade, Lisa (2013). Prison labor and taxpayer dollars, p. 1;

Zatz, Noah (2008). Working at the boundaries of markets: prison labor and the economic dimension of employment relationships, UCLA School of Law, University of California, Los Angeles, p: 868-871.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP1704347T

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)