PECULIAR FIVE-DIMENSIONAL BLACK HOLES

Dejan Simić

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.2298/FUPCT1901069S
First page
069
Last page
078

Abstract


In this article, we review two black hole solutions to the five-dimensional Lovelock gravity. These solutions are characterized by the non-vanishing torsion and the peculiar property that all their conserved charges vanish. The first solution is a spherically symmetric black hole with torsion, which also has zero entropy in the semi-classical approximation. The second solution is a black ring, which is the five-dimensional uplift of the BTZ black hole with torsion in three dimensions.


Keywords

black hole, torsion, alternative theories of gravity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aros, R., Troncoso, R. and Zanelli, J., 2001. Phys. Rev. D63, [hep-th/0011097], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.084015.

Boulware, D. G. and Deser, S., 1985. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2656.

Camanho, X. O. and Edelstein, J. D., 2013. Class. Quant. Grav. 30, arXiv:1103.3669 [hep-th], DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/30/3/035009.

Canfora, F., Giacomini, A. and Willinson, S., 2007. Phys. Rev. D76, 044021, arXiv:0706.2891 [gr-qc], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.044021.

Canfora, F., Giacomini, A. and Troncoso, R., 2008. Phys. Rev. D77, 024002, arXiv:0707.1056 [hep-th], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024002.

Cai Rong-Gen and Ohta, N., 2006. Phys. Rev. D74, 064001, [hep-th/0604088], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.064001.

Cai Rong-Gen, Caob, Li-Ming and Ohta, N., 2010. Phys. Rev. D81, 024018, [hep-th/0911.0245], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.024018.

Cvetković, B. and Simić, D., 2016. Phys. Rev. D94, no.8, 084037, arXiv:1608.07976 [gr-qc], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.084037.

Cvetković, B. and Simić, D., 2018. Class. Quant. Grav. 35, no.5, 055005, arXiv:1708.08766[gr-qc], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064031.

Dotti, G., Oliva, J. and Troncoso, R., 2007. Phys. Rev. D76, 064038, arXiv:0706.1830 [hep-th], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.064038.

Emparan, R. and Reall, H. S., 2002. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, [hep-th/0110260], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.101101.

Emparan, R. and Reall, H. S., 2008. Living Rev. Rel. 11, arXiv:0801.3471 [hep-th], DOI: 10.12942/lrr-2008-6.

Garcia, A., Hehl, F. W., Heinecke, C. and Macias, A., 2003. Phys. Rev. D67, 124016, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.124016.

Garraffo, C. and Giribet, G., 2008. Mod. Phys. Lett. A23, 1801, arXiv:0805.3575 [gr-qc], DOI: 10.1142/S0217732308027497.

Gregory, R. and Lafflamme, R., 1993. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2837, [hep-th/9301052], DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2837.

Horowitz, G. T. and Strominger, A., 1991. Nucl. Phys. B360, 197, DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(91)90440-9.

Kastor, D. and Mann, R. B., 2006. JHEP 0604, 048, [hep-th/0603168], DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/04/048.

Lovelock, D., 1971. J. Math. Phys. 12, 498, DOI: 10.1063/1.1665613.

Lovelock, D., 1972. J. Math. Phys. 13, 874, DOI: 10.1063/1.1666069.

Maeda, H., Willison, S. and Ray, S., 2011. Class. Quant. Grav. 28, 165005, arXiv:1103.4184 [gr-qc], DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/28/16/165005.

Nester, J. M., 1991. Mod. Phys. Lett. A6, 2655, DOI: 10.1142/S0217732391003092.

Obukhov, Y. N., 2003. Phys. Rev. D68, 124015, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.124015.

Obukhov, Yu. N., 2006. Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 3, 95, DOI: 10.1142/S021988780600103X.

Ray, S., 2015. Class. Quant. Grav. 32, no.19, 195022, arXiv:1505.03830 [gr-qc], DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/32/19/195022.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-4656 (print)

ISSN 2406-0879 (online)