RISK MANAGEMENT AND PARTICIPATION OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CONSIDERING TRANSMISSION LINE CONGESTION IN THE SMART GRIDS FOR DEMAND RESPONSE

Cyrous Beyzaee, Sara Karimi Marvi

DOI Number
10.2298/FUEE2004583B
First page
583
Last page
603

Abstract


Demand response (DR) could serve as an effective tool to further balance the electricity demand and supply in smart grids. It is also defined as the changes in normal electricity usage by end-use customers in response to pricing and incentive payments. Electric cars (EVs) are potentially distributed energy sources, which support the grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) modes, and their participation in time-based (e.g., time of use) and incentive-based (e.g., regulation services) DR programs helps improve the stability and reduce the potential risks to the grid. Moreover, the smart scheduling of EV charging and discharging activities supports the high penetration of renewable energies with volatile energy generation. This article was focused on DR in the presence of EVs to assess the effects of transmission line congestion on a 33-bit grid. A random model from the standpoint of an independent system operator was used to manage the risk and participation of EVs in the DR of smart grids. The main risk factors were those caused by the uncertainties in renewable energies (e.g., wind and solar), imbalance between demand and renewable energy sources, and transmission line congestion. The effectiveness of the model in a 33-bit grid in response to various settings (e.g., penetration rate of EVs and risk level) was evaluated based on the transmission line congestion and system exploitation costs. According to the results, the use of services such as time-based DR programs was effective in the reduction of the electricity costs for independent system operators and aggregators. In addition, the results demonstrated that the participation of EVs in incentive-based DR programs with the park model was particularly effective in this regard.

Keywords

Electric Vehicles, Smart Grid, V2G, G2V, GAMS, Loss Function, Demand Response

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lutsey N. Global milestone: the first million electric vehicles. 2015.

Wilson L. The EV wedge: how electric vehicle fuel savings vary by country (and car). 2015.

Z. Yang, K. Li, A . Foley, “Computational scheduling methods for integrating plugin electric vehicles with power systems: a review”, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, vol. 51, pp. 396–416, 2015.

G. Cardoso, M. Stadler, M.C. Bozchalui, R. Sharma, C. Marnay, A. Barbosa-Povoa, et al., “Optimal investment and scheduling of distributed energy resources with uncertainty in electric vehicle driving schedules”, Energy, vol. 64, pp. 17–30, 2014.

K. Mets, R. D'hulst, C. Develder, “Comparison of intelligent charging algorithms for electric vehicles to reduce peak load and demand variability in a distribution grid”, Commun Netw J, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 672–81, 2012.

M. Musio, P. Lombardi, A. Damiano, “Vehicles to grid (V2G) concept applied to a virtual power plant structure”, In Proceedings of XIX international conference on electrical machines - ICEM 2010, Rome, Italy, 2010.

C. White, K. Zhang, “Using vehicle-to-grid technology for frequency regulation and peak-load reduction”, J Power Sources; vol. 196, no. 8, pp. 392–398, 2011.

M. Honarmand, A. Zakariazadeh, S. Jadid, “Optimal scheduling of electric vehicles in an intelligent parking lot considering vehicle-to-grid concept and battery condition”, Energy, vol. 65, pp. 572–579, 2014.

S. Shao, M. Pipattanasomporn, S. Rahman, “Grid integration of electric vehicles and demand response with customer choice”, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 543–50, 2012.

A. Khazali, M. Kalantar, “A stochasticeprobabilistic energy and reserve market clearing scheme for smart power systems with plug-in electrical vehicles”, Energy Convers Manag, vol. 105, pp. 1046–105, 2015.

E. Sortomme, M.A. El-Sharkawi, “Optimal combined bidding of vehicle-to-grid ancillary services”, IEEE Trans Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 70–79, 2012.

A. Damiano, G. Gatto, I. Marongiu, M. Porru, A. Serpi, “Vehicle-to-Grid technology: state-of-the-art and future scenarios”, J Energy Power Eng, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 152, 2014.

R. Sioshansi, “OR Forum-Modeling the impacts of electricity tariffs on plug-in hybrid electric vehicle charging, costs, and emissions”, Oper Res, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 506–516, 2012.

S. Habib, M. Kamran, U. Rashid, “Impact analysis of vehicle-to-grid technology and charging strategies of electric vehicles on distribution networksea review”, J Power Sources, vol. 277, pp. 205–214, 2015.

M. Yilmaz, P.T. Krein, “Review of the impact of vehicle-to-grid technologies on distribution systems and utility interfaces”, IEEE Trans Power Electron, vol28, no. 12, pp. 5673–5689, 2013.

N. Nezamoddini, Y. Wang, Risk management and participation planning of electric vehicles in smart grids for demand response.

L. Zhang, Z. Zhao, J. Chai and Z. Kan, “Risk Identification and Analysis for PPP Projects of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Based on 2-Tuple and the DEMATEL Model”, World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 10, no. 4, 2019.

Risk Management and Public Participation (GEOG90020), Handbook,the university of melbourne, 2019.

Y. Wang, L. Li, “Time-of-use based electricity demand response for sustainable manufacturing systems”, Energy, vol. 63, pp. 233–244, 2013.

Y. Wang, L. Li, “Time-of-use electricity pricing for industrial customers: a survey of US utilities”, Appl Energy, vol. 149, pp. 89–103, 2015.

A. Khalid, N. Javaid, A. Mateen, M. Ilahi, T. Saba and A. Rehman. “Enhanced Time-of-Use Electricity Price Rate Using Game Theory”.

W. Kempton, J. Tomic, “Vehicle-to-grid power fundamentals: calculating capacity and net revenue”, J Power Sources, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 268–279, 2005.

D. Howarth, B. Monsen, “Renewable energy faces daytime curtailment in California”, 2015.

CAISO renewable watch data.

N. Growe-Kuska, H. Heitsch, W. Romisch, “Scenario reduction and scenario tree € construction for power management problems”, In Proceedings of IEEE power tech conference, Bologna, Italy, 2003.

F. Thangaiyan, Risk Management in renewable energy and sustainability in india., project. July 2019.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN: 0353-3670 (Print)

ISSN: 2217-5997 (Online)

COBISS.SR-ID 12826626