CONSTITUTIONAL PRECEDENT IN THE US SUPREME COURT REASONING

David Schultz

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP240709011S
First page
119
Last page
129

Abstract


Precedent or stare decisis is a central feature of common law systems, such as in the United States. Precedent in the United States is employed as an interpretive tool to guide judicial interpretations of legal texts, but it is considered part of the law and binding not only on the parties to the case but also on other courts and governmental bodies. This article examines the role of constitutional precedent in the US Supreme Court reasoning. It describes what precedent is, its justification, and how it operates as a part of the law to constrain or bind judicial decision making. The article also examines situations when constitutional precedent has been rejected and why, and how that pattern of rejection has changed over time. Overall, the purpose of the article is to familiarize students and scholars with the role the constitutional precedent occupies in the US legal reasoning and law.


Keywords

Common law, precedent, stare decisis, United States, Constitutional Law.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Apple, James G., & Deyling, Robert P. (1995). A Primer on the Civil-Law System. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.

Bankowski, Zenon; MacCormick, Neil D.; Morawski, Lech; & Miguel, Alfonso Ruiz (1997). “Rationales for Precedent.” In Neil D. MacCormick, & Robert S Summers (eds). Interpreting Precedents. New York: Routledge, 481-501.

Blackman, Josh (2019). The Irrepressible Myth of Cooper v. Aaron. The Georgetown Law Journal, 107, 1135-1204.

Boyle, E. H.; Kim, M.; & Longhofer, W. (2015). Abortion liberalization in world society, 1960–2009. American Journal of Sociology, 121(3), 882-913.

Breyer, Stephen (2024). Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmaticism, Not Textualism. New York, Simon & Schuster.

Cardozo, Benjamin N. (1991). The Nature of the Judicial Process. New Haven: Yale University Press. 149.

Duxbury, Neil (2008). The Nature and Authority of Precedent. New York: Cambridge.

Dworkin, Ronald (1986). Law’s Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Easterbrook, Frank H. (1998). “Stability and Reliability in Judicial Decisions,” 73 Cornel Law Review. 422.

Farber, Daniel A. (2006). The Rule of Law and the Law of Precedents, 90 Minnesota Law Review. 1173.

Garner, Bryan A. (2016). The Law of Judicial Precedent. Saint Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters.

Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. (1881). The Common Law. Boston: Little Brown.

Jackson, Robert (1944). Decisional Law and Stare Decisis, 30 A. B. A. Journal. 334.

Kozel, Randy J. (2013). Precedent and Reliance, 62 Emory L.J. 1459.

Levi, Edward H. (1949). An Introduction to Legal Reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

MacCormick, Neil D., & Summers, Robert S. (1997). Interpreting Precedents. New York: Routledge.

Markman, Stephen (2011). Originalism and Stare Decisis. 34 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 111.

McHugh, James, T. (2002). Comparative Constitutional Traditions. NY: Peter Lang.

Monaghan, Henry Paul (1988). Stare Decisis and Constitutional Adjudication, 88 Columbia Law Review. 723.

Murrill, Brandon J. (2018). The Supreme Court’s Overruling of Constitutional Precedent, Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C.

Peczenik, Aleksander (1997). The Binding Force of Precedent, In Neil D. MacCormick & Robert S. Summers (eds.), Interpreting Precedents, New York: Routledge, 461.

Powell, Lewis F. Jr. (1990). Stare Decisis And Judicial Restraint. 47 Washingon & Lee Law Review. 281.

Schauer, Frederick (1987). Precedent. 39 Stanford Law Review. 571.

Schlag, Pierre, & Griffin, Amy J. (2020). How to Do Things with Legal Doctrine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Schultz, David (2022). The Role of Constitutional Precedent in US Supreme Court Reasoning. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar

Segel, Jeffrey A., & Spaeth, Harold J. (2002). The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Soriano, Leonor Moral (1998). The Use of Precedents as Arguments of Authority, Arguments ab exemplo, and Arguments of Reason in Civil Law Systems, 11 Ratio Juris. 90.

Strauss, David A. (1997). Common Law Constitutional Interpretation, 63 University of Chicago Law Review. 877.

Summers, Robert S. & Eng, Svein (1997). Departures from Precedent, In Neil D. MacCormick and Robert S. Summers (eds.). Interpreting Precedents. New York: Routledge, 519.

Washington University Law (2020). The Supreme Court Database, available at http://scdb.wustl.edu/(site last visited on July 7, 2024).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP240709011S

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)