LEGAL STANDING AND VICTIM STATUS OF INDIVIDUALS AND ASSOCIATIONS AFTER THE ‘KLIMASENIORINNEN’ CASE

Alfred Benny Auner

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP241007012A
First page
131
Last page
146

Abstract


In its judgment Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others, the ECtHR created a positive obligation for Contracting States under Article 8 ECHR to protect individuals from the serious adverse effects of climate change. In order to prevent universal public access to the ECtHR (actio popularis), which has only a subsidiary role in the protection of fundamental rights, the Court developed new criteria for the legal standing and the victim status of applicants, and came to a peculiar conclusion: while associations are generally granted legal standing and can act before the ECtHR, their individual members are largely denied the victim status and, therefore, cannot bring an application before the Court (Article 34 ECHR). In this article, the author will critically analyse the criteria and findings of the Court on legal standing and victim status in light of the Convention and the settled case law.

Keywords

Aarhus Convention, access to justice, admissibility, climate change, European Convention on Human Rights, European Court of Human Rights, locus standi, victim status.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Auner, A.B. (2024). Recht auf effektive Maßnahmen zur Eindämmung des Klimawandels. Entscheidungsanmerkung [ECHR (GC) judgment 9.4.2024 in case Appl.no.53600/20] (Right to effective measures to mitigate climate change. Case Note [ECtHR GC judgment 9.4.2024 in case Appl.no.53600/20], Newsletter Menschenrechte/NLMR, Vol. 33, No.2/2024 (p. 123-126); Jan Sramek Verlag, Wien; https://rdb.manz.at/document/rdb.tso.ENnlmr20240205

Blattner, C. (2024). Separation of Powers and KlimaSeniorinnen, Verfassungsblog, 30 April 2024, https://verfassungsblog.de/separation-of-powers-and-klimaseniorinnen/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

Brucher, A., De Spiegeleir, A. (2024). The European Court of Human Rights’ April 9 Climate Rulings and the Future (Thereof), Verfassungsblog, 29 April 2024, https://verfassungsblog.de/the-european-court-of-human-rights-april-9-climate-rulings-and-the-future-thereof/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

Douglas-Scott, S. (2014), Opinion 2/13 on EU accession to the ECHR: a Christmas bombshell from the European Court of Justice, Verfassungsblog, 24 December 2014, https://verfassungsblog.de/opinion-213-eu-accession-echr-christmas-bombshell-european-court-justice-2/ (accessed 25 October 2024).

Eeckhout, P. (2024). From Strasbourg to Luxembourg?: The KlimaSeniorinnen judgment and EU remedies, Verfassungsblog, 5 June 2024, https://verfassungsblog.de/from-strasbourg-to-luxembourg/

Ekardt, F. (2024). ECtHR Favours 1.5-Degree Limit: Revolution for the Climate - And for Other Environmental Problems, Völkerrechtsblog, 5 June 2024, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/ecthr-favours-1-5-degree-limit/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

Hilson, C., Geden, O. (2024). Climate or carbon neutrality? Which one must states aim for under Article 8 ECHR?, EJIL:Talk!, 29 April 2024, https://www.ejiltalk.org/climate-or-carbon-neutrality-which-one-must-states-aim-for-under-article-8-echr/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

Hösli, A., Rehmann, M. (2024). Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland: the European Court of Human Rights’ Answer to Climate Change, Climate Law, 2024, pp.1-22

Humphreys, S. (2024). A Swiss human rights budget?, EJIL:Talk!, 12 April 2024, https://www.ejiltalk.org/a-swiss-human-rights-budget/(accessed 5 October 2024)

Jelić, I., Fritz, E. (2024). The ‘Living Instrument’ at the Service of Climate Action: The ECtHR Long-Standing Doctrine Confronted to the Climate Emergency, Journal of Environmental Law, 2024, Vol.36, No.2, 2024, pp. 141-158

Keller, H., Pershing, A. (2022). Climate Change in Court: Overcoming Procedural Hurdles in Transboundary Environmental Cases, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review, Vol.3., No.1., 2022, pp. 23-46

Letwin, J. (2024). Klimaseniorinnen: the Innovative and the Orthodox, EJIL:Talk!, 17 April 2024, https://www.ejiltalk.org/klimaseniorinnen-the-innovative-and-the-orthodox/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

Mariconda, A. (2023). Victim Status of Individuals in Climate Change Litigation before the ECtHR, The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law, Vol.3, No.2, 2023, pp. 260-282

Nakanishi, Y. (2024). Possibility of Extending Legal Standing under Article 263 (4) TFEU in the Matter of Climate Litigation, Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics, Vol.52, No.1, 2024, pp. 1-12

Netto, L. (2024). Resisting the Allure of Future Generations’ Rights: The ECtHR’s Approach to Climate Action in KlimaSeniorinnen, Völkerrechtsblog, 19 April 2024, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/resisting-the-allure-of-future-generations-rights/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

Nóbrega, S. (2020). EU climate law through the lens of the Aarhus Convention: Access to environmental information and public participation in EU climate change decision making, ProefschriftMaken, Maastricht

Peters, B. (2018). Unpacking the Diversity of Procedural Environmental Rights: The European Convention on Human Rights and the Aarhus Convention, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol.30, No.1, 2018, pp. 1-27

Prantl, J. (2024). After Switzerland Comes Austria: Why the ECtHR could soon grant individual standing in a climate mitigation case for the first time, Verfassungsblog, 24 May 2024; https://verfassungsblog.de/after-switzerland-comes-austria/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

Raible, L. (2024). Climate Change and Positive Obligations in the ECHR, Völkerrechtsblog, 29.05.2024, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/climate-change-and-positive-obligations-in-the-echr/ (5 Oct. 2024)

Schayani, K. (2024). No Global Climate Justice from this Court: A Critical Analysis on How the ECtHR’s Rulings in the Climate Change Cases Exclude the Most Affected People and Areas from Access to Climate Change Litigation, Völkerrechtsblog, 15 April 2024, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/no-global-climate-justice-from-this-court/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

Theilen, J. (2024). Racialised Climate Justice: Contextualising the Climate Change Cases before the European Court of Human Rights, Völkerrechtsblog, 01.06.2024, https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/racialised-climate-justice/ (accessed 5 October 2024)

UN/United Nations (2014). The Aarhus Convention. An Implementation Guide (2nd ed.). (2014). Geneva, CH: United Nations [Implementation Guide]

Vidigal, G. (2024). International Trade and ‘Embedded Emissions’ after KlimaSeniorinnen: The Extraterritoriality of Climate Change Obligations, Verfassungsblog, 1 May 2024, https://verfassungsblog.de/international-trade-and-embedded-emissions-after-klimaseniorinnen/ (5 Oct.2024)

Weber, T. (2023). Are climate activists protected by the Aarhus Convention? A note on Article 3(8) Aarhus Convention and the new Rapid Response Mechanism for environmental defenders, Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, Vol.32, No.1, 2022, pp. 67-76

Zahar, A. (2024). With Swiss Seniors the Climate-Litigation Movement Chalks up Another Hollow Victory, Climate Law, 2024, pp. 1-32

Žatková, S., Paľuchová, P. (2024). ECtHR: Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland (Appl. No. 53600/20, 9 April 2024): Insufficient Measures to Combat Climate Change Resulting in Violation of Human Rights, Bratislava Law Review, Vol.8, No.1, 2024, pp. 227-244

Legal Documents

Austrian Federal Act on Environmental Impact Assessment (Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfungsgesetz), Austrian Federal Law Gazette 697/1993, amended version I 26/2023.

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (CFR), OJ C 326, 26 October 2012.

Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, OJ L 375, 31. December 1991.

Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights 2007/C 303/02), Official Journal EU, C 303/17, 14 Dec.2007; Explanation on Article 47: Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial.

UN ECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters 2161 UNTS 447 (1999), 25 June 1998

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (23 May 1969), UN Treaty Series, Vol.1155, p.331, Vienna.

Case Law

Case Appl. 5856/72 Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, ECtHR judgment of 25 April 1978

Case Appl. 6833/74 Marckx v. Belgium, ECtHR judgment of 13 June 1979

Case Appl. 7601/76, 7806/77, 7806/77 Young, James & Webster v. the United Kingdom, CoE Commission’s Report of 14 December 1979

Case Appl. 14038/88 Soering v. the United Kingdom, ECtHR judgment of 7 July 1989

Case Appl. 16798/90 López Ostra v. Spain, ECtHR judgment of 9 December 1994

Case Appl. 17550/90, 17825/91 Vijayanathan and Pusparajah v. France, ECtHR judgment of 27 August 1992

Case Appl. 25088/94, 28331/95, 28443/95 Chassagnou and Others v. France, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 29 April 1999

Case Appl. 46117/99 Taşkın and Others v. Turkey, ECtHR judgment of 10 November 2004

Case Appl. 48939/99 Öneryıldız v. Turkey, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 30 November 2024

Case Appl. 2113/04 Schneider v. Luxembourg, ECtHR judgment of 10 July 2007

Case Appl. 25965/04 Rantsev v. Cyprus and Russia, ECtHR judgment of 7 January 2010

Case Appl. 34932/04 Paksas v. Lithuania, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 6 January 2011

Case Appl. 47143/06 Roman Zakharov v. Russia, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 4 December 2015

Case Appl. 47848/08 Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 17 July 2014

Case Appl. 29381/09, 32684/09 Vallianatos and Others v. Greece, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 7 November 2013

Case Appl. 32631/09, 53799/12 Magnitskiy and Others v. Russia, ECtHR judgment of 27 August 2019

Case Appl. 18030/11 Magyar Helsinki Bizottság v. Hungary, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 8 November 2016

Case Appl. 54414/13, 54264/15 Cordella v. Italy, ECtHR judgment of 24 January 2019

Case Appl. 37857/14 Yusufeli İlçesini Güzelleştirme Yaşatma Kültür Varlıklarını Koruma Derneği v. Turkey, ECtHR decision of 7 December 2021

Case Appl. 22457/16 X and Others v. Bulgaria, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 2 February 2021

Case Appl. 22597/16 R.B. v. Estonia, ECtHR judgment of 22 June 2021

Case Appl. 56581/00 Sejdovic v. Italy, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 1 March 2006

Case Appl. 56672/00 Senator Lines GmbH v. Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom, ECtHR (GC) decision of 10 March 2004

Case Appl. 62543/00 Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, ECtHR judgment of 27 April 2004

Case Appl. 67021/01 Tătar v. Romania, ECtHR judgment of 27 November 2009

Case Appl. 6422/02 Segi and Gestoras Pro-Amnistía and Others v. 15 States of the European Union, ECtHR decision of 23 May 2002

Case Appl. 64220/19 Föderation der Aleviten Gemeinden in Österreich v. Austria, ECtHR judgment of 5 March 2024

Case Appl. 10103/20 Sieć Obywatelska Watchdog Polska v. Poland, ECtHR judgment of 21 March 2024

Case Appl. 39371/20 Duarte Agostinho and Others v. Portugal and 32 Others, ECtHR (GC) judgment 9 April 2024

Case Appl. 53600/20 Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, ECtHR (GC) judgment of 9 April 2024

Case Appl. 53600/20 Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland, Dissenting Opinion of Judge Eicke

Case Appl. 7189/21 Carême v. France, ECtHR (GC) decision of 9 April 2024

Case Appl. 18859/21 Müllner v. Austria, ECtHR pending case

Case Appl. 2/13 to the Court of Justice of the EU, CJEU Opinion 2/13 of 18 December 2014

Case C-25/62, Plaumann v. Commission of the EEC, CJEU judgment of 15 July 1963

Case C-240/09, Lesoochranárske zoskupenie VLK, CJEU judgment of 8 March 2011

Case C-664/15, Protect Natur-, Arten- und Landschaftschutz Umweltorganisation, CJEU judgment of 20 Decenber 2017

Case C-197/18, Wasserleitungsverband Nördliches Burgenland and Others, CJEU judgment of 3 October 2019

Case C-565/19 P, Carvalho and Others v. Parliament and Council, CJEU judgment of 25 March 2021

Case V 87/2014, Austrian Constitutional Court decision of 14 December 2016

Case V 134/2015, Austrian Constitutional Court decision of 14 December 2016

Case Appl.1 BvR 2656/18 Neubauer and Others v. Germany, German Federal Constitutional Court Order of 24 March 2021.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP241007012A

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)