LOCAL KNOWLEDGE ON THE LOCAL OWNERSHIP PRINCIPLE IN SERBIA

Zorica Mršević

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP1801001M
First page
001
Last page
013

Abstract


This paper presents the way of functioning and implementation of the local ownership principle in situations where the support of local knowledge during the process of establishment of gender equality mechanisms is lacking. Gender equality mechanisms were part of the package of international organizations’ influence over the process of democratic institutional reform in Serbia. The whole process is based on a numerous international documents that incite and justify the establishment of institutional mechanisms for gender equality at all levels of government: national, regional and local. The experience and knowledge of Western countries has contributed most to the process of formulating gender equality mechanisms and their subsequent functioning in Serbia. The lack of local knowledge production regarding the essence and role of the local ownership principle in the creation of gender equality institutions is permanent in Serbia. The concept of "learning sites", i.e. external actors becoming familiar with an internal situation has barely been applied in Serbia. The so-called "glocal" period of deep intermingling of both local and global elements did not happen. The authors argue that there was no essential "localization" of gender equality mechanisms based on domestic knowledge, and that both foreign and domestic actors are responsible for this situation: External actors because, apart from Western theory and experience, they are unaware of and/or neglect local knowledge, regardless of whether they consider it non-existent or inferior in comparison to the knowledge of Western countries. At the same time, domestic actors became quickly satisfied with the comfortable position of secondary lead stakeholders, with a role of transmitters and users of foreign concepts. They did not take advantage of the opportunities provided by the local ownership principle and did not pretend to take on either the role of creators or of relevant knowledge holders of policy-based public policies and practices.

Keywords

international actors, local ownership principle, learning sites, humanitarian industry, gender equality mechanisms in Serbia, transversal policy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abeles, Mark. 2014. Antropologija globalizacije. Beograd: Biblioteka 20. vek.

Jakšić, Ana. 2016. Prikaz knjige Poluperiferija i rod: pobuna konteksta. P.U.L.S.E. magazin.

Kaplan, Melissa. 2013. Local ownership: Who what and how. Devex - International Development News.

Kolarić, Ana. 2011. „Жена, домаћица, мајка. Од те три речи зависи цео свет” analiza časopisa Žena(1911-1921). u: Knjiženstvo, časopis za studije književnosti, roda i kulture. godina I broj 1.

Majstorović, Danijela. 2013. Diskursi i periferije. Beograd: Biblioteka XX vek.

Mičić, Maja. 2016. Standardi i uloga Organizacije za evropsku bezbednost i saradnju (OEBS) u vezi sa ostvarivanjem rodne ravnopravnosti u državama članicama. Univerzitet u Novom Sadu: Asocijacija centara za interdisciplinarne i multidisciplinarne studije, Centar za rodne studije.

Mršević, Zorica. 2001. Ka demokratskom društvu - Rodna ravnopravnost. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.

Mršević, Zorica. 2007. Ka demokratskom društvu – sistem izbornih kvota. Beograd: Institut društvenih nauka.

Mršević, Zorica. i Janković, Svetlana. 2017. Primena principa lokalnog vlasništva: od viktimizacije do osnaživanja žena, Temida, vol. 20, br. 1, str. 23-44.

Mršević, Zorica. i Janković, Svetlana. 2017. Mehanizam za rodnu ravnopravnost kao deo globalizacijskih trendova. u: Globalizacija i izolacionizam, ur. Vukotić Veselin i Šuković Danilo, Beograd: Centar za ekonomska istraživanja Instituta društvenih nauka.

Naj, Džozef. 2018. Meka i oštr moće Kine. Danas, 19. januar, str.17.

Reich, Hannah. 2006. „Local Ownership“ in Conflict Transformation Projects Partnership, Participation or Patronage? Berghof Occasional Paper. No. 27 September.

Schirch, Lisa. and Deborah, Mancini-Griffoli. 2015. Local Ownership in Security: Case Studies of Peacebuiiding Approaches. The Hague: Alliance for Peacebuilding, GPPAC, Kroc Institute.

Sklevicky, Lydia. 1996. Konji, žene, ratovi. Zagreb: Ženska infoteka.

Tarnaala, Elisa. 2016. Women in Armed Groups & Fighting Forces: Lessons from Gender Sensitive Disarmament, Demobilization & Reintegration Programmes, Oslo: Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre (NOREF).

Tiessen, Rebecca. 2015. Gender essentialism in Canadian foreign aid commitments to women, peace, and security. International Journal, Vol. 70(1) str.84–100.

United States Institut for peace. 2011. USIP „Peace Terms“ Glossary.

Welsh Cleland, Anthony. Gordon, Eleanor. & Roos, Emmicki. 2015. Security Sector Reform and the Paradoxical Tension between Local Ownership and Rod Equality. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development. 4(1), p.Art. 53.

Wong, Pearly. 2013. „Local Ownership“ in Peacebuilding – a Premature Rhetoric? United Nations Peace and Progress. Volume 1 (1), str. 47-57.

Yuval-Davis Nira. 1985. „Front and rear: The sexual division of labor in Israeli army“. Feminist Studies 11/1985, str. 663.

Yuval-Davis Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation, London: SAGE Publications.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULP1801001M

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1450-5517 (Print)
ISSN 2406-1786 (Online)