CORRELATIVE CONJUNCTIONS AS SPACE BUILDERS: VIOLATION OF PARALLEL STRUCTURE OFFERS CORRELATIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REALITY OF MENTAL SPACES
Abstract
The paper aims to explore how violations of parallel structure in English correlative conjunctions affect participants’ response times (RTs) and accuracy ratings in an online incremental grammaticality judgment task, where correlative conjunctions are understood as space builders (i.e., each correlative conjunction is expected to yield a dual-space network). The study included 37 advanced EFL students from the University of Niš. The main experiment included 14 target sentences with 7 different correlative conjunctions, with the second part of a correlative conjunction missing. Stimuli were presented word-by-word, with a mask, in a self-paced moving windows paradigm. The relevant independent variables recorded in Open Sesame were RTs and response accuracy. The obtained results show increased RTs associated with error positions. Specifically, the analysis of the overall mean tendency across all items and over the entire sample showed significantly higher mean RTs in the error position compared to RTs in accurate sentence positions (p<.001). Moreover, the analysis of overall accuracy showed a significantly higher mean value of accurate responses for correct sentence parts compared to the sentence parts with an error (p=.006), and a significantly lower mean value of inaccurate responses in correct sentence parts compared to parts of sentences with errors (p=.015). By-item analyses showed higher counts of accurate responses in error positions, which also reached significance in most cases. The obtained results offer correlational support for the psychological reality of parallel structure and mental spaces.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barsalou, Lawrence, W. 2009. “Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364: 1281–1289. https://doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
Blackwell, Arshavir, Elizabeth Bates, and Dan Fisher. 1996. “The Time Course of Grammaticality Judgement.” Language and Cognitive Processes 11, no. 4: 337–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696387150
Branigan, Holly, P., Martin J. Pickering, Simon P. Liversedge, Andrew J. Stewart, and Thomas P. Urbach. 1995. “Syntactic Priming: Investigating the Mental Representation of Language.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24, no.6: 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143163
Coulson, Seana and Todd Oakley. 2005. “Blending and Coded Meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics.” Journal of Pragmatics 37, no. 10: 1510–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.010
Evans, Vyvyan and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1981. “Pragmatic functions and mental spaces.” Cognition 10: 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(81)90029-9
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994[1985]. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220
Fauconnier, Gilles. 2007. Mental Spaces. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cyckens, 35–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.001.0001
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2000. “Compression and global insight.” Cognitive Linguistics 11: no. 3 and 4: 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2001.017
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Figar, Vladimir. 2018. “Testing the Psychological Reality of Parallel Structure with Serbian EFL Students: A Case Study of “not only … but also”.” Facta Universitatis, Series Linguistics and Literature 16, no. 1: 39–64. https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL1801039F
Figar, Vladimir. 2021. Semantic frame activation and contextual aptness of metaphorical expressions. Ph.D. Thesis. Niš: Faculty of Philosophy.
Fillmore, Charles, J. 1982. “Frame Semantics.” In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, edited by The Linguistic Society of Korea, 111–137. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin Publishing Company.
Frazier, Lyn, Alan Munn, and Charles Clifton, Jr. 2000. “Processing Coordinate Structures.” Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, no. 4: 343–370. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005156427600
Greenbaum, Sidney and Randolph Quirk. 1990. A Student’s Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Greenbaum, Sidney and Gerald Nelson. 2002. An Introduction to English Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834139
Hoex, John C. J., Wietske Vonk, and Herbert Schrieferes. 2002. “Processing Coordinated Structures in Context: The Effect of Topic-Structure on Ambiguity Resolution.” Journal of Memory and Language 46, no. 1: 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2800
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lester, Mark. 2008. ESL Grammar: A Handbook for Intermediate and Advanced ESL Students. New York: McGraw Hill.
Mathôt, Sebastian, Daniel Schreij, and Jan Theeuwes. 2012. “OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 44, no. 2: 314–324.
Mišić-Ilić, Biljana. 2008. Syntax for EFL Students. Niš: Faculty of Philosophy, Niš.
Pollock, Carrol Washington. 1997. Communicate What You Mean, 2nd edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Prćić, Tvrtko. 1997. Semantika i pragmatika reči. Sremski Karlovci i Novi Sad: Izdavačka knjižarnica Zorana Stojanovića.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London and New York: Longman.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL240928004F
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 0354-4702 (Print)
ISSN 2406-0518 (Online)