BECOMING THE POSTHUMAN: THE DESTABILISATION OF THE SUBJECT IN THOMAS GLAVINIC’S NIGHT WORK

Branka B. Ognjanović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL2002223O
First page
223
Last page
233

Abstract


The paper provides an insight into the destabilisation of the subject and the emergence of the posthuman condition in the novel Night Work (Die Arbeit der Nacht, 2006) by Austrian writer Thomas Glavinic. The first part briefly discusses previous analyses of the novel and the definitions of posthumanism as an umbrella term for a heterogeneous theory dedicated to the questions of what follows after the re-consideration of the humanist ideals and after decentring the human. The posthuman is interpreted as non-fixed, in the state of constant reconstruction as opposed to the humanist subject’s fixedness and integrity. The analysis examines the ‘uncanny’ setting of the novel and the power of survival in the face of death, which becomes the protagonist’s point of demise and divergence from consciousness and rationality. The urban environment devoid of all organic life replaces the Other applied traditionally to other humans. The Sleeper as the nightly doppelgänger and the filming of the environment further add to the transgression of the boundaries between material and immaterial, the living and the non-living, the real and the dreamlike/artificial, and ultimately determine the protagonist’s posthuman existence in the state of ‘becoming’ rather than ‘being’.


Keywords

Austrian literature, horror, the uncanny, posthumanism, subjectivity, Thomas Glavinic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benjamin, Walter. 2008. “The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility: Second Version.” In The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility and Other Writings on Media, 19–55. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Boeckl, Nora. 2015. Wirklichkeit als Versuchsanordnung. Postavantgardistisches Schreiben in der österreichischen Gegenwartsliteratur des Postmillenniums am Beispiel von Thomas Glavinic. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

Brajdoti, Rozi. 2016. Posthumano. Beograd: Fakultet za medije i komunikacije.

Callus, Ivan, and Stefan Herbrechter. 2012. “Introduction: Posthumanist subjectivities, or, coming after the subject ….” Subjectivity 5, no. 3: 241–264. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.17.

Campbell, Norah, and Mike Saren. 2010. “The primitive, technology and horror: A posthuman biology.” ephemera 10, no. 2: 152–176. http://www.ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/10-2campbellsaren.pdf.

Canetti, Elias. 1981. Crowds and Power. New York: Continuum.

Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.

Domanska, Ewa. 2010. “Beyond Anthropocentrism in Historical Studies.” Historein 10: 118–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/historein.11.

Forsbach, Felix. 2014. „Epiphanie des Augenblicks. Zeit im Werk Thomas Glavinics.“ Germanica 55. http://journals.openedition.org/germanica/2700.

Foucault, Michel. 1974. Die Ordnung der Dinge. Eine Archäologie der Humanwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Foucault, Michel. 1995. Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

Freud, Sigmund. 2004. “The Uncanny.” In Fantastic Literature: A Critical Reader, edited by David Sandner, 74–101. Westport, Connecticut and London: Praeger.

Glavinic, Thomas. 2008. Night Work, Edinburgh & London: Canongate.

Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouseTM. London and New York: Routledge.

Haraway, Donna. 2016a. Manifestly Haraway. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.

Haraway, Donna. 2016b. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman. Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. University of Chicago Press.

Herbrechter, Stefan. 2016a. „Inhuman–Posthuman–Nonhuman. Plädoyer für einen kritischen Posthumanismus.“ PhiN-Beiheft 10: 9–24.

Herbrechter, Stefan. 2016b. „Kritischer Posthumanismus.“ Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung 7/1: 61–68.

Iovino, Serenella. 2016. “Posthumanism in Literature and Ecocriticism.” Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism 3, no. 1: 11–20.

Krämer, Lisa. 2015. Das Motiv der Einsamkeit in den „Jonas-Romanen“ von Thomas Glavinic. Bamberg: University of Bamberg Press.

Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.

Landau, Solange. 2014. „Im Angesicht des Untergangs: Krisen des Individuums im deutschsprachigen (Post)Desaster-Roman.“ Germanica 55. http://journals.openedition.org/germanica/2667.

McLary, Laura. 2015. “The Hypertrophied Subject in Thomas Glavinic’s Wie man leben soll and Die Arbeit der Nacht.” International Languages and Culture Faculty Publications and Presentations 5. https://pilotscholars.up.edu/ilc_facpubs/5/.

Miah, Andy. 2008. “A Critical History of Posthumanism.” In Medical Enhancement and Posthumanity, edited by Bert Gordijn and Ruth Chadwick, 71–94. Dordrecht: Springer.

Pearce, Fred. 2007. With Speed and Violence: Why Scientists Fear Tipping Points in Climate Change. Boston: Beacon Press.

Standke, Jan. 2014. „Gegenwartsliteraturforschung – Gegenwartsliteraturunterricht? Thomas Glavinics Romane in literaturwissenschaftlicher und deutschdidaktischer Perspektive.“ In Die Romane Thomas Glavinics. Literaturwissenschaftliche und deutschdidaktische Perspektiven, herausgegeben von Jan Standke, 19–51. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.

Stobbe, Martin. 2016. Postsäkular erzählen. Religion und Unzuverlässigkeit im Roman der Gegenwart. Münster: Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster.

Stoiser, Claudia. 2013. „Es lebe die Einsamkeit!“: Alleinsein, Einsamkeit und soziale Isolation literarischer Figuren in ausgewählten Texten der neueren deutschen Literatur. Hamburg: Diplomica Verlag.

Živković, Milica. 2000. “The Double as the ‘Unseen’ of Culture: Toward a Definition of Doppelganger.” Facta Universitatis 7 (2): 121–128.

Živković, Milica. 2012. „’To a New World of Gods and Monsters’: Posthumanizam, teorijsko kritički pravac za novi milenijum.” Nauka i savremeni univerzitet 2. Zbornik radova. 34–46. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL2002223O

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-4702 (Print)

ISSN 2406-0518 (Online)