FROM PROBLEMS OF LANGUAGE AND MIND TO PSYCHOLINGUISTICS: AN OVERVIEW OF COURSES
Abstract
The paper aims to provide an overview of the development and changes in the courses at the Department of English in Niš, at the BA and MA level, as well as at the PhD level (in philology, Faculty of Philosophy, Niš), related to different linguistic approaches to the study of meaning (construction) and human cognition. These courses included in the curricula were initially influenced by the ideas stemming from the philosophy of mind and cognitive linguistics, and later by psycholinguistic research. We begin the paper with the general overview of the courses and we emphasize the main contributions to their development. Then we address in more detail some of the most important theoretical concepts which include the following: meaning construction, categorization, context, and a general overview of the main ideas in cognitive linguistics and psycholinguistics. We also stress the benefits of such a comprehensive approach for the students, and the thereby presented possibilities for further investigation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Antović, Mihailo. 2004. Muzika i jezik u ljudskom umu [Music and Language in the Human Mind]. Niš: Niški kulturni centar.
Antović, Mihailo. 2009. Lingvistika, muzikalnost, kognicija [Linguistics, Musicality, Cognition]. Niš: Niški kulturni centar.
Antović, Mihailo. 2017. Od neurona do smisla: Lingvistika u kognitivnim naukama [From neuron to sense: Linguistics in Cognitive Sciences]. Niš: Faculty of Philosophy.
Antović, Mihailo. 2018a. “Persuasion in musical multimedia: A Conceptual Blending Theory Approach.” In Persuasion in Public Discourse: Cognitive and Functional Perspectives, edited by Jana Pelcova and Wei-lun Lu, 303–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.79.14ant.
Antović, Mihailo. 2018. “Waging war against oneself: A conceptual blend at the heart of Christian ascetic practice.” In Religion, Language, and the Human Mind, edited by Paul Chilton and Monika Kopytowska, 386–406. New York: Oxford University Press.
Antović, Mihailo. 2021. “Multilevel grounded semantics across cognitive modalities: Music, vision, poetry.” Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics, OnlineFirst, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947021999182.
Antović, Mihailo and Miloš Tasić. 2011. “Muzika na granici i teorija konceptualne integracije: analiza jedne pesme sa juga Srbije.” Teme 4: 1521–1542.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cienki, Alan and Kornelia Müller. 2008. Metaphor and Gesture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Cowles, H. Wind. 2011. Psycholinguistics 101. New York: Springer.
Culler, J. D. 1988. Saussure. Fontana Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 2007. “Mental Spaces.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cyckens, 351–376. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Field, John. 2003. Psycholinguistics: A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge.
Figar, Vladimir. 2020. “Testing the Activation of Semantic Frames in a Lexical Decision Task and a Categorization Task.” Facta Universitatis, Series Linguistics and Literature 18(2): 159–179. https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL2002159F.
Figar, Vladimir. 2021. “Semantic Frame Activation and Contextual Aptness of Metaphorical Expressions.” PhD diss., University of Niš.
Figar, Vladimir, and Mihailo Antović. 2015. “Metaphor Clusters in the New York Times Press Reports of the 2012 Presidential Elections in the U.S.” In Language, Literature, Discourse: Linguistic Research, edited by Biljana Mišić–Ilić and Vesna Lopičić, 233–258. Niš: Faculty of Philosophy, Niš.
Firth, John Rupert. 1950. “Personality and Language in Society.” The Sociological Review 42 (1), 37–52.
Firth, John Rupert. 1962. “A Synopsis of Linguistic Theory, 1950–1955.” In Studies in Linguistic Analysis, edited by The Philological Society of Great Britain, 1–32. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Forceville, J. Charles and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. 2009. Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Holyoak, Keith and Dušan Stamenković. 2018. “Metaphor Comprehension: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence.” Psychological Bulletin 144 (6): 641–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000145.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1995. Patterns in the Mind: Language and Human Nature. New York: Basic Books.
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Katz, J. Jerrold and Jerry A. Fodor. 1963. “The structure of a Semantic Theory.” Language 39: 170–210.
Kostić, Aleksandar. 2014. Kognitivna psihologija [Cognitive Psychology], 3. izdanje. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike.
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Malinowski, Bronisław. 1964. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In The Meaning of Meaning, edited by Charles K. Ogden and Ivor A. Richards, 296–336. New York: A Harvest Book.
Mandler, Jean. 2012. “On the Spatial Foundations of the Conceptual System and Its Enrichment.” Cognitive Science 36 (3), 421–451.
Menn, Lise. 2015. Psycholinguistics: Introduction and Applications, 2nd edition. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
Milenković, Katarina. 2021. “Odnos osobina metafore i njihovog razumevanja: psiholingvistički pristup [The Relation between Metaphor Features and Their Comprehension: A Psycholinguistic Approach].” PhD diss., University of Niš.
Morsanyi, Kinga and Dušan Stamenković. 2021. “Idiom and Proverb Processing in Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-021-00079-4.
Morsanyi, Kinga, Dušan Stamenković, and Keith J. Holyoak. 2020. “Metaphor Processing in Autism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Developmental Review 57: 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100925.
Oakley, Todd. 2007. “Image Schemas.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cyckens, 214–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Palmer, Frank. 1976. Semantics: A New Outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pavlović, Vladan and Marta Veličković. 2021. “Cognitive-linguistic Research at the English Department: Theoretical, Methodological and Applied Aspects.” Facta Universitatis, Series Linguistics and Literature (this volume).
Rosch, Eleanor. 1973. “Natural Categories.” Cognitive Psychology 4, no. 3: 328–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0.
Rosch, Eleanor. 1975. “Cognitive representations of semantic categories.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 104 (3): 192–233.
Rosch, Eleanor and Carolyn B. Mervis. 1975. “Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.” Cognitive Psychology 7 (4): 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.
Stamenković, Dušan. 2015. “The effects of animated visual stimuli on the process of conceptual blending in riddle solving”. Facta Universitatis, Series Linguistics and Literature 13 (1): 11–19.
Stamenković, Dušan. 2017. Jezik i kretanje: kognitivnosemantički ogledi [Language and Motion: Cognitive Semantic Studies]. Niš: Faculty of Philosophy.
Stamenković, Dušan and Miloš Tasić. 2014. “The Contribution of Cognitive Linguistics to Comics Studies”. The Balkan Journal of Philosophy 6 (2): 155–162.
Stamenković, Dušan, Katarina Milenković and Jovana Dinčić. 2019. “Studija normiranјa knјiževnih i neknјiževnih metafora iz srpskog jezika [A norming study of Serbian literary and nonliterary metaphors]”. Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku 62 (2): 89–104.
Stamenković, Dušan, Miloš Tasić and Vladan Pavlović 2017. “Prototype theory and translation equivalent selection: The case of motion verbs.” Studia Neophilologica 89 (1): 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2015.1132179.
Stamenković, Dušan, Nicholas Ichien, and Keith J. Holyoak. 2019. “Metaphor Comprehension: An Individual-Differences Approach.” Journal of Memory and Language 105: 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.12.003.
Stamenković, Dušan, Nicholas Ichien, and Keith J. Holyoak. 2020. “Individual Differences in Comprehension of Contextualized Metaphors.” Metaphor and Symbol 35 (4): 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1821203.
Sternberg, Robert J. 2011. Cognitive Psychology, 6th edition. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Stojičić, Violeta and Dušan Stamenković. 2016. “Crosslanguage research on encoding coextension paths in English (L2) to Serbian (L1) translation: An empirical study”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology 24 (4): 635–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1069864.
Stojičić, Violeta and Dušan Stamenković. 2017. “Ontological metaphor in verb and abstract noun collocations in Serbian: A sample analysis.” Scando-Slavica 63 (2): 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00806765.2017.1390937.
Traxler, Matthew J. 2012. Introduction to Psycholinguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Vidanović, Ðorđe. 1981. “Linguistic Analysis of Ictal Speech Mechanisms in Sensory Aphasia.” Zbornik radova Katedre za anglistiku 2: 317–327.
Vidanović, Ðorđe. 1986. “Semantics and the Human Mind.” Polja 328–329: 281–285.
Vidanović, Ðorđe. 1987. “Rationalism or Empiricism: Chomsky or Popper?” Synthesis philosophica 2, no. 3: 179–189.
Vidanović, Đorđe. 1989. Problemi jezika i uma [Problems of Language and Mind]. Novi Beograd: Istraživačko-izdavački centar SSO Srbije.
Vidanović, Ðorđe. 1990. “Cognitive linguistic theory and the problem of meaning.” SOL 1–2: 75–95.
Vidanović, Ðorđe. 1995. “Metaphoring and Metaphor: A Research Proposal.” Facta Universitatis, Series Linguistics and Literature 1 (2): 158–162.
Vidanović, Ðorđe. 2012. “Conceptual Blending and Intentionality.” Facta Universitatis, Series Linguistics and Literature 10 (1): 41–52.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2001. Philosophical Investigations. Hoboken: Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL210718008F
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 0354-4702 (Print)
ISSN 2406-0518 (Online)