Email this article APPLICATION OF HYBRID DIBR-FUCOM-LMAW-BONFERRONI-GREY-EDAS MODEL IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
Abstract
The selection of unmanned aerial vehicles for different purposes is a frequent topic of research. This paper presents a hybrid model of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) selection using the Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria (DIBR), Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) and grey - Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (G-EDAS) methods. The above-mentioned model is tested and confirmed in a case study. First of all, in the paper are defined the criteria conditioning the selection, and then with the help of experts and by applying the DIBR, FUCOM and LMAW methods, the weight coefficients of the criteria are determined. The final values of the weight coefficients are obtained by aggregating the values of the criteria weights from all the three methods using the Bonferroni aggregator. Ranking and selection of the optimal UAV from twenty-three defined alternatives is carried out using the G-EDAS method. Sensitivity analysis confirmed a high degree of consistency of the solutions obtained using other MCDM methods, as well as changing the criteria weight coefficients. The proposed model has proved to be stable; its application is also possible in other areas and it is a reliable tool for decision-makers during the selection process.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Holder, A., 2020, The centrality of militarised drone operators in militarised drone operations, Ethnographic Studies, 17(1), pp. 81-99.
Özgüven, M.M., Altaş, Z., Güven, D., Çam, A., 2022, Use of Drones in Agriculture and Its Future, Ordu University Journal of Science and Technology, 12(1), pp. 64-83.
Mounica, B., Sathya, N., Likitha, R., Meghana, C.A., 2020, Traffic Surveillance Using Smart Drone, International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology (IJSRCSEIT), 6(2), pp. 356-363.
Hall, O., Wahab, I., 2021, The Use of Drones in the Spatial Social Sciences, Drones, 5(4), 112.
Rosser, J.C.Jr, Vignesh, V., Terwilliger, B.A., Parker, B.C., 2018, Surgical and Medical Applications of Drones: A Comprehensive Review, Journal of The Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons, 22(3), e2018.00018.
Gupta, К., Bansal, S., Goel, R., 2021, Uses of Drones in Fighting COVID-19 Pandemic, Proc. 10th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART), Moradabad, India, pp. 651-655.
Campana, S., 2017, Drones in Archaeology State-of-the-art and Future Perspectives, Archaeological Prospection, 24(5), pp. 275-296.
Stankov, U., Kennell, J., Morrison, A.M., Vujičić, M., 2019, The view from above: The relevance of shared aerial drone videos for destination marketing, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(7), pp. 808-822.
Vázquez-Tarrío, D., Borgniet, L., Liébault, F., Recking, A., 2017, Using UAS optical imagery and SfM photogrammetry to characterize the surface grain size of gravel bars in a braided river (Vénéon River, French Alps), Geomorphology, 285, pp. 94–105.
Piégay, H., Arnaud, F., Belletti, B., Bertrand, M., Bizzi, S., Carbonneau, P., Dufour, S., Liébault, F., Ruiz-Villanueva, V., Slater, L., 2020, Remotely sensed rivers in the Anthropocene: State of the art and prospects. Earth Surface Process and Landforms, 45(1), pp. 157-188.
Banu, T.P., Borlea, G.F., Banu, C., 2016, The Use of Drones in Forestry, Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, B 5, pp. 557-562.
Cruz, H., Eckert, M., Meneses, J., Martínez, J.F., 2016, Efficient Forest Fire Detection Index for Application in Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs), Sensors, 16(6), 893.
Wieczorowski, M., Swojak, M., Pawlus, P., Pereira, A., 2021, The Use of Drones in Modern Length and Angle Metrology, Modern Technologies Enabling Safe and Secure UAV Operation in Urban Airspace, 59, pp. 125-140.
Nadobnik, J., 2016, The use of drones in organizing the Olympic Games, Handel Wewnętrzny, 6(365), pp. 288-299.
Petrovski, A., Radovanović, M., 2021, Application of detection reconnaissance technologies use by drones in collaboration with C4IRS for military interested, Contemporary Macedonian Defence, 21(40), pp. 117-126.
Padró, J.C., Muñoz, F.J., Ávila, L.Á., Pesquer, L., Pons, X., 2018, Radiometric Correction of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A Scenes Using Drone Imagery in Synergy with Field Spectroradiometry, Remote Sensing, 10(11), 1687.
Paneque-Gálvez, J., McCall, M.K., Napoletano, B.M., Wich, S.A., Koh, L.P., 2014, Small Drones for Community-Based Forest Monitoring: An Assessment of Their Feasibility and Potential in Tropical Areas, Forests, 5(6), pp. 1481-1507.
Milić, A., Ranđelović, A., Radovanović, M., 2019, Use of drones in operations in the urban environment, Proc. 5th International Scientific conference Safety and crisis management – Theory and practise Safety for the future (SecMan), Belgrade, Serbia, pp. 124-130.
Tanteri, L., Rossi, G., Tofani, V., Vannocci, P., Moretti, S., Casagli, N., 2017, Multitemporal UAV Survey for Mass Movement Detection and Monitoring. In: Mikos, M., Tiwari, B., Yin, Y., Sassa, K. (eds), Advancing Culture of Living with Landslides (WLF 2017), Springer, Cham, pp. 153-161.
Hassanalian, M., 2018, Conceptual design, bioinspiration, and multidisciplinary analysis of drones, PhD Thesis, New Mezico State University, Las Cruces, New Mezico, USA.
Krakowiak, E., 2018, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in the Security Service and as a New Tool in the Hands of Criminals, Safety & Defense, 4(1), pp. 31-36.
Zheng, M., Teng, H., Wang, Y. 2023, Application of new robust design by means of probability-based multi-objective optimization to machining process parameters, Military Technical Courier, 71(1), pp. 84-99.
Yalcin, A.S., Kilic, S.H., Delen, D., 2022, The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174(15), 121193.
Narang, M., Kumar, A., Dhawan, R., 2023, A fuzzy extension of MEREC method using parabolic measure and its applications, Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), pp. 33-46.
Granados, C., Das, A.K., Osu, B.O., 2023, Weighted Neutrosophic Soft Multiset and Its Application to Decision Making, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 33(2), pp. 293-308,
Karimoddini, A., Cavalline, L.T., Smith, B., Hewlin, R., Homaifar, A., 2022, UAV Selection Methodology and Performance Evaluation to Support UAV-Enabled Bridge Inspection, Report Number: NCDOT2020-23NCDOT Project RP2020-23, Autonomous Cooperative Control of Emergent Systems of Systems (ACCESS) Laboratory Electrical and Computer Engineering Department North Carolina A&T State University.
Coban, S., Kiracı, K., Akan, E., Uzun, M., 2022, MALE UAV selection in interval Type-2 fuzzy sets environment, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 43(5), pp. 1-28.
Radovanović M., Petrovski A., Žindrašič V., Ranđelović A., 2021, Application of the fuzzy AHP -VIKOR hybrid model in the selection of an unmanned aircraft for the needs of tactical units of the armed forces, Scientific Technical Review, 71(2), pp. 26-35.
Hamurcu, M., Eren, T., 2020, Selection of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles by Using Multicriteria Decision-Making for Defence, Journal of Mathematics, 2020(1), 4308756.
Liu, C.C., Chen, J.J., 2019, Analysis of the Weights of Service Quality Indicators for Drone Filming and Photography by the Fuzzy Analytic Network Process, Applied Sciences, 9(6), 1236.
Karaşan, A., Kaya, İ., 2020, Neutrosophic TOPSIS Method for Technology Evaluation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), Proc. Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques in Big Data Analytics and Decision Making (INFUS 2019), Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1029, pp. 665-673.
Adamski, M., 2020, Effectiveness analysis of UCAV used in modern military conflicts, Aviation, 24(2), pp. 66-71.
Jović, Ž., 2016, Combat engagement of drones in USA counterterrorist operations, Bezbednost, 58(3), pp. 171-190.
Petrovski, A., Bogatinov, D., Radovanovic, M., Radovanovic, M., 2023, Application of Drones in Crises Management Supported Mobile Applications and C4IRS Systems, In: Dobrinkova, N., Nikolov, O. (eds), Environmental Protection and Disaster Risks (EnviroRISKs 2022), Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 638. Springer, Cham, pp. 321-334.
Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Işık, M., Zizovic, M., 2021, Circular economy concepts in urban mobility alternatives using integrated DIBR method and fuzzy Dombi CoCoSo model, Journal of cleaner production, 323, 129096.
Alosta, A., Elmansuri, O., Badi, I., 2021, Resolving a location selection problem by means of an integrated AHP-RAFSI approach, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 2(1), pp. 135-142.
Tešić, D., Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., Din, J., 2022, DIBR–FUZZY MARCOS model for selecting a location for a heavy mechanized bridge, Military Technical Courier, 70(2), pp. 314-339.
Pamucar, D., Simic, V., Lazarević, D., Dobrodolac, M., Deveci, M., 2022, Prioritization of Sustainable Mobility Sharing Systems Using Integrated Fuzzy DIBR and Fuzzy-Rough EDAS Model, Sustainable Cities and Society, 82, 103910.
Lukić, R., 2023, Performance Analysis of Trading Companies in Serbia Based on DIBR - WASPAS Methods, Proc. 28th International Scientific Conference Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management SM 2023, Subotica, Serbia, pp. 361-372.
Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Sremac, S., 2018, A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Symmetry, 10(9), 393.
Popović, V., Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., Lukovac, V., Jovković, S., 2022, Multicriteria Optimization of Logistics Processes Using a Grey FUCOM-SWOT Model, Symmetry, 14(4), 794.
Biswas, S., Pamučar, D., Kar, S., Sana, S.S., 2021, A New Integrated FUCOM–CODAS Framework with Fermatean Fuzzy Information for Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making, Symmetry, 13(12), 2430.
Feizi, F., Karbalaei-Ramezanali, A.A., Farhadi, S., 2021, FUCOM-MOORA and FUCOM-MOOSRA: new MCDM-based knowledge-driven procedures for mineral potential mapping in greenfields, SN Applied Science, 3, 358.
Khan, F., Ali, Y., Pamucar, D., 2022, A new fuzzy FUCOM-QFD approach for evaluating strategies to enhance the resilience of the healthcare sector to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, Kybernetes, 51(4), pp. 1429-1451.
Pamučar, D., Ecer, F., Deveci., M., 2021, Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology, Science of The Total Environment, 788, 147763.
Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Sremac, S., 2019, An Integrated FUCOM-EDAS Model for Decision Making in Transportation of Dangerous Goods, Proc. 15th International May Conference on Strategic Management (IMCSM), Bor, Serbia, 15(1), pp. 17-25.
Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., Božanić, D., 2021, A new Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: Application in Logistics, Facta Universitatis Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), pp. 361-380.
Tešić, D., Božanić, D., Puška, A., Milić, A., Marinković, D., 2023, Development of the MCDM fuzzy LMAW-grey MARCOS model for selection of a dump truck, Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 4(1), pp. 1-17.
Lukić, R., 2023, Application of the LMAW-DNMA method in the evaluation of the environmental problem in the agriculture of selected European Union countries, Acta Agriculturae Serbica, 28(55), 49-61.
Lukić, R., 2023, Measurement and analysis of profitability dynamics of the banking sector in Serbia based on the FLMAW-MARCOS method, Bankarstvo, 52(1), 8-47.
Sıcakyüz, Ç., 2023, Analyzing Healthcare and Wellness Products’ Quality Embedded in Online Customer Reviews: Assessment with a Hybrid Fuzzy LMAW and Fermatean Fuzzy WASPAS Method, Sustainability, 15(4), 3428.
Lin, Y.H., Lee, P.C., Chang, T.P., Ting, H.I., 2008, Multi-attribute group decision making model under the condition of uncertain information, Automation in Construction, 17(6), pp. 792-797.
Deng, J.L., 1992, An Introduction to Grey Mathematics–Grey Hazy Set, Press of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan.
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z., 2015, Multicriteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS), Informatica, 26(3), pp. 435-451.
Ecer, F., 2018, Third-party logistics (3Pls) provider selection via Fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), pp. 615-634.
Komasi, H., Zolfani, S. H., Nemati, A., 2023, Evaluation of the social-cultural competitiveness of cities based on sustainable development approach, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 6(1), 583-602.
Peng, Z., Dai, J., Yuan, H., 2017, Interval-valued fuzzy soft decision-making methods based on MABAC, similarity measure and EDAS, Fundamenta Informaticae, 152(4), pp. 373-396.
Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., 2017, Multi-criteria group decision-making using an extended EDAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, Ekonomika a management, 20(1), pp. 48-68.
Menekşe, A., Camgöz Akdağ, H., 2022, Distance education tool selection using novel spherical fuzzy AHP EDAS, Soft Computing, 26(4), pp. 1617-1635.
Karatop, B., Taskan, B., Adar, E., Kubat, C., 2021, Decision analysis related to the renewable energy investments in Turkey based on a fuzzy AHP-EDAS-fuzzy FMEA approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 151(3), 106958.
Kahraman, C., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Cevik Onar, S., Yazdani, M., Oztaysi, B.,
, Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection,
Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 25(1), pp. 1-12.
Liang, Y., 2020, An EDAS method for multiple attribute group decision-making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment and its application for evaluating green building energy-saving design projects, Symmetry, 12(3), 484.
Rogulj, K., Pamuković, J.K., Antucheviciene, J., Zavadskas, E.K., 2022, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Support Based on EDAS and Grey Relational Degree for Historic Bridges Reconstruction Priority, Soft computing, PREPRINT (Version 1). Available at Research Square: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1164217/v1.
Stanujkić, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z., 2017, An Extension of the EDAS Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers, Studies in Informatics and Control, 26(1), pp. 5-12.
Terzioglu, T., Polat, G., 2022, Formwork System Selection in Building Construction Projects Using an Integrated Rough AHP-EDAS Approach: A Case Study, Buildings, 12(8), 1084.
Li, G.D., Yamaguchi, D., Nagai, M., 2007, A grey-based decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(3-4), 573-581.
Bonferroni, C., 1950, Sulle medie multiple di potenze, Bollettino Matematica Italiana, 5(3-4), pp. 267-270.
Bošković, S., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Jovčić, S., Zanne, M., 2023, An Extended AROMAN Method for Cargo Bike Delivery Concept Selection, Decision Making Advances, 1(1), pp. 1-9.
Biswas, S., Joshi, N., 2023, A Performance based Ranking of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) in India, Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), pp. 15-32.
Đukić, Đ., Petrović, I., Božanić, D., Delibašić, B., 2022, Selection of Unployed Aircraft for Training of Small-Range Aircraft Defense System AHP – TOPSIS Optimization Methods, Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, 32(3), pp. 389-406.
Roozbahani, A., Ghased, H., Hashemy, S.M., 2020, Inter-basin water transfer planning with grey COPRAS and fuzzy COPRAS techniques: A case study in Iranian Central Plateau, Science of The Total Environment, 726, 138499.
Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G., 2015, The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC), Expert Systems with Applications, 42, pp. 3016-3028.
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., 2010, A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), pp. 159-172.
Badi, I., Stević, Ž, Bayane Bouraima, M., 2023, Overcoming Obstacles to Renewable Energy Development in Libya: An MCDM Approach towards Effective Strategy Formulation, Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 17-24.
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J., Zakarevicius, A., 2012, Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment, Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika, 122(6), pp. 3-6.
Gigović, L., Pamučar, D., Bajić, Z., Milićević, M., 2016, The Combination of Expert Judgment and GIS-MAIRCA Analysis for the Selection of Sites for Ammunition Depots, Sustainability, 8(4), 372.
Sadeghi, M., Razavi, S.H., Saberi, N, 2013, Application of Grey TOPSIS in Preference Ordering of Action Plans in Balanced Scorecard and Strategy Map, Informatica, 24(4), pp. 619-635.
Bitarafan, M., Amini Hosseini, K., Zolfani, S.H., 2023, Identification and assessment of man-made threats to cities using integrated Grey BWM- Grey MARCOS method, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 6(2), pp. 581-599.
Ulutaş, A., Popović, G., Stanujkić, D., Karabašević, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., 2020, A New Hybrid MCDM Model for Personnel Selection Based on a Novel Grey PIPRECIA and Grey OCRA Methods, Mathematics, 8(10), 1698.
Stanujkić, D., Zavadskas, E.K., Liu, S., Karabašević, D., Popović, G., 2017, Improved OCRA Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers, The Journal of Grey System, 29(4), pp. 49-60.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME230824036R
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN: 0354-2025 (Print)
ISSN: 2335-0164 (Online)
COBISS.SR-ID 98732551
ZDB-ID: 2766459-4