JOURNALISTS ON MEDIA FREEDOM: TEXTUAL ANALYSIS OF METAJOURNALISTIC DISCOURSE IN ONLINE MEDIA IN SERBIA

Marta Mitrović, Marija Vujović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH240206005M
First page
057
Last page
067

Abstract


Journalists in Serbia have been in a continuously challenging position in recent decades (Freedom House, Nations in Transit 2022; Kulić, 2020; Milutinović, 2019; Milivojević et al., 2011). The expectations that the change in the country's political system at the beginning of the 21st century would bring significant improvements in media freedom have been disappointed. Over the last decade, the media freedom index has been steadily declining, placing Serbia among the countries with a "problematic situation" regarding media freedom (Statista, Press Freedom Index). This study aims to analyze the metajournalistic discourse (Carlson 2016; Vos & Singer 2016; Ferrucci, Nelson and Davis 2020) in texts published in online media and address the research questions: RQ1: How do journalists in Serbia interpret "media freedom" through the discourse published in online media texts? and RQ2: What is the tone of that metadiscourse? The analyzed texts were published in ten online media outlets in 2021 and 2022. The texts were collected using the news-generating website naslovi.net, using the keyword "media freedom." A total of 230 texts were selected in which journalists served as sources of information, either through statements or in authored texts (columns, commentaries). Through further analysis, the texts were categorized into four categories, created based on the dominant discourse prevailing in the text. The majority of the texts fell into the category of "pressures and attacks" (142), followed by "state and media" (63), "ethics and the law" (22), while three texts were related to the "market." The results indicate a predominantly negative discourse, which is in line with the axiom that gaining media freedom in challenging political systems is a daily effort.

Keywords

media freedom, journalism profession, discourse analysis, textual analysis, metajournalistic discourse.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carlson, Matt. „Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation“. Communication theory 26, 4 (2016): 349–368.

Christians, Clifford G., Theodore Glasser, Denis McQuail, Kaarle Nordenstreng, and Robert White. Normative theories of the media: Journalism in democratic societies. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2010.

Coffey, Amanda and Paul Atkinson. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Sage Publications, Inc, 1996.

Ferrucci, Patrick., Jacob. L. Nelson, and Miles. P. Davis. „From ’Public Journalism’ to ’Engaged Journalism’: Imagined Audiences and Denigrating Discourse“. International Journal of Communication 14 (2020): 1586–1604.

Fidalgo, Joaquim. „Journalism is changing – and what about journalism ethics?“. Paper presented in the IAMCR 2013 Conference Ethics of Society and Ethics of Communication Working Group Dublin – Ireland, 25–29 June, 2013 URL: https://core.ac.uk/reader/55629750

Freedom House (n.d.). „Nations in Transit 2022“. Retrieved July 2, 2023, https://freedomhouse.org/country/serbia/nations-transit/2022

Hallin, Daniel. C. and Paolo Mancini. Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Hanitzsch, Thomas. „Comparative Journalism Studies“. In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, edited by Karina Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch, 413–427. Routledge, 2009.

Kleinsteuber, Hans. J., and Barbara Thomass. „Comparing media systems: the European dimension“. CM časopis 5, 16 (2010): 5–20.

Kulić, Milica. „Redefinisanje uloge novinara u novom medijskom okruženju: ideologija novinarstva, polarizacija medija i socioekonomski položaj novinara“. CM časopis 15, 48 (2020): 115–135.

Matić, Jovanka. „Tri nivoa odbrane novinarskog profesionalizma. In Indikatori profesionalnog/ neprofesionalnog ponašanja novinara i medija – mogućnosti za poboljšanje stanja, edited by Rade Veljanovski, 73–84. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka, 2015.

McKee, Alan. „A beginner's guide to textual analysis“. Metro Magazine: Media & Education Magazine 127/128 (2001): 138–149.

Milinkov, Smiljana. „Uticaj klijentelističke prakse na medijski sadržaj i slobodu medija“. Godišnjak Filozofskog fakulteta u Novom Sadu 43, 1 (2018): 217–233.

Milivojević, Snježana, Miroljub Radojković, Maja Raković, Ana Milojević, Aleksandra Ugrinić and Marijana Matović. Profesija na raskršću – novinarstvo na pragu informacionog društva. Beograd: Fakultet političkih nauka, Centar za medije i medijska istraživanja, 2011.

Milutinović, Irina R. „Kriza profesionalnog novinarstva u tranzicionom društvu Srbije“. Sociološki pregled 53, 3 (2019): 1046–1070.

Mitrović, Marta and Ana Milojević. „Professional Identity of Journalists Then and Now: A Perspective of Journalists From Southeast Serbia“. Media Studies and Applied Ethics 3, 1 (2022): 53–67.

News generator. „Naslovi.net“. Retrieved October 10, 2022, https://naslovi.net/search.php?q=sloboda+medija&sel=1&izvori%5B%5D=137&start=151

Siebert, Fred, Theodore Peterson, and Wilbur Schramm. Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility, and Soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. University of Illinois Press, 1956.

Statista. „Press freedom index in Serbia from 2013 to 2021“. Retrieved April 28, 2023, https://www.statista.com/statistics/1026485/serbia-press-freedom-index/

van Dijk, Teun, A. „News, Discourse, and Ideology“. In The Handbook of Journalism Studies edited by Karina Wahl-Jorgensen and Thomas Hanitzsch, 191–204. New York and London: Routledge, 2009.

Vos, Tim. P. and Jane B. Singer. „Media Discourse about Entrepreneurial Journalism: Implications for Journalistic Capital“. Journalism Practice 10, 2 (2016): 143–159.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH240206005M

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1820-8495 (Print)

ISSN 1820-8509 (Online)