CONFLICTED REALITIES: THE SCHÜTZIAN ADDITION TO THEORISING ON THE SYMBOLIC STRUGGLES OVER COMMUNION IN SERBIA DURING COVID

Miloš Jovanović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH250507002J
First page
011
Last page
029

Abstract


This paper aims to analyse and interpret the heated public debate prompted by the organization of communion during the pandemic. Performing this ritual during the lockdown, enacted due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, spawned intensive and highly polarised public reactions. The emerging debates vividly portrayed the symbolic struggles or culture wars pertinent to the Serbian society. Bourdieu’s theory of classification struggles and Lamont’s conceptualization of symbolic boundaries provided the framework for an earlier consideration of these disputes (Jovanović 2022). This article attempts a theoretical recasting. Taking cues from Schütz’s essay “Equality and the meaning structure of the social world” regarding “the ways of life of a group as seen by in-group and out-group”, a portrayal of socially approved typifications organized in domains of relevances of the aforementioned conflicted groups will be made. This will in turn provide insights into “relative natural worldview” (relativ natürliche Weltanschauung) of the conflicted groups: the means by which they define its situation within the social cosmos, with this definition(s) becoming an integral element of the situation itself. Pronounced hostility between the “defenders” and the “disputers” of communion during COVID can be understood relying on Schütz’s discussion of the out-group’s interpretation of the world taken for granted by the in-group.

Keywords

symbolic struggles, definitions of reality, definitional power, systems of relevances, in-group and out-group

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barber, Michael. “Finite Provinces Of Meaning: The Expansive Context of Relevance”. In Relevance and Irrelevance: Theories, Factors and Challenges, edited by Jan Strassheim and Hisashi Nasu, 51–68. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472509-003

Barber, Michael D. “Alfred Schütz: Imposed Political Relevances and the Subjective Meaning of the Actor”. In The Routledge Handbook of Political Phenomenology, edited by Steffen Herrmann, Gerhard Thonhauser, Sophie Loidolt, Tobias Matzner and Nils Baratella, 156–166. London, New York: Routledge, 2024a. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003197430-18

Barber, Michael. Resilience and Responsiveness: Alfred’s Schutz’s Finite Provinces of Meaning. Cham: Springer. 2024b. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53781-3

Belvedere, Carlos. A Treatise in Phenomenological Sociology: Object, Method, Findings, and Applications. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2022.

Bourdieu, Pierre. “On Symbolic Power”. In Language & Symbolic Power, 163–170. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.

Bourdieu, Pierre. Classification Struggles. Cambridge, UK; Medford, MA: Polity Press, 2018.

Braun, Virginia and Victoria Clarke. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide to Understanding and Doing. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2022.

Dreher, Jochen. “Alfred Schutz”. In The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists, edited by George Ritzer and Jeffrey Stepnisky, 489–510. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444396621.ch16

Dreher, Jochen and Daniela Griselda López. “Subjectivity and Power”. Human Studies 38 (2015): 197–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9338-9

Embree, Lester. “Schutz on Reducing Social Tensions”. In The Schutzian Theory of the Cultural Sciences, 171–188. Cham: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13653-0_17

Göttlich, Andreas. “Power and powerlessness: Alfred Schütz’s theory of relevance and its possible impact on a sociological analysis of power”. Civitas – Revista de Ciêncas Sociales 11 (2011): 491–508. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2011.3.10062

Göttlich, Andreas. “Imposed Relevance: On the Sociological Use of a Phenomenological Concept”. Schutzian Research 4 (2012): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.7761/SR.4.33

Göttlich, Andreas. “Alfred Schütz’s theory of relevance”. In The Anthem Companion to Alfred Schutz, edited by Michael Barber, 9–28. London, New York: Anthem Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2vdbswd.6.

Hovorun, Archimandrite Cyril. “‘Covid Theology,’ or the ‘Significant Storm’ of the Coronavirus Pandemic”. State, Religion and Church 8 (2021): 20–33. https://doi.org/10.22394/2311-3448-2021-8-2-20-33

Jovanović, Miloš. Simbolički sukobi oko pričešća u Srbiji za vreme pandemije. Niš: Filozofski fakultet, 2022. https://doi.org/10.46630/spp.2022

Kessareas, Efstathios. “Holy Communion in Greek Orthodoxy in the Time of Coronavirus: Ideological Perspectives in Conflict”. Religions 14, 5 (2023): 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14050647

Kim, Kwang-ki and Tim Berard. “Typification in Society and Social Science: The Continuing Relevance of Schutz’s Social Phenomenology”. Human Studies 32 (2009): 263–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-009-9120-6

Kozinets, Robert V., Pierre-Yann Dolbec and Amanda Earley. “Netnographic Analysis: Understanding Culture through Social Media Data”. In SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by Uwe Flick, 262–275. London: SAGE, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n18

Lamont, Michèle and Virág Molnár. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences”. Annual Review of Sociology 28 (2002): 167–195. https://doi.org/0.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107

Nasu, Hisashi. “A continuing dialogue with Alfred Schutz”. Human Studies 31 (2008): 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-008-9080-2

Nasu, Hisashi. “Alfred Schutz’s conception of relevance and its significances for the social sciences”. Sociologia e ricerca sociale 124 (2021): 17–36. https://doi.org/10.3280/SR2021-124002

Pietrykowski, Bruce. “Alfred Schutz and the Economists”. History of Political Economy 28 (1996): 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-28-2-219

Popitz, Heinrich. Phenomena of Power: Authority, Domination, and Violence. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.

Pula, Besnik. Alfred Schutz, Phenomenology, and the Renewal of Interpretive Social Science. London; New York: Routledge, 2024.

Schütz, Alfred. “On Multiple Realities”. In Collected Papers I, edited by Maurice Natanson, 207–286. Dordrecht: Springer, 1962. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2851-6_9

Schütz, Alfred. “Equality and the meaning structure of the social world”. In Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, edited by Arvid Brodersen, 226–273. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964a. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1340-6_11

Schütz, Alfred. “The well-informed citizen: An essay on the social distribution of knowledge”. In Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, edited by Arvid Brodersen, 120–134. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1964b. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1340-6_6

Schütz, Alfred. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967.

Schütz, Alfred. “Some Structures of the Lifeworld”. In Collected Papers III: Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy, edited by Ilse Schütz, 116–132. Dordrecht: Springer, 1970. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-3456-7_7

Schütz, Alfred. “Outline of a Theory of Relevance”. In Collected Papers IV, edited with preface and notes by Helmut Wagner and George Psathas in collaboration with Fred Kersten, 3–5. Dordrecht: Springer, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1077-0_1

Schütz, Alfred. “Reflections on the Problem of Relevance”. In Collected Papers V: Phenomenology and the Social Sciences, edited by Lester Embree, 93–199. Cham: Springer Science, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1515-8_4

Schütz, Alfred and Thomas Luckmann. The Structures of the Life-World (R. M. Zaner & H. T. Engelhardt, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

Srubar, Ilja. “The Origin of the Political”. In Schutzian Social Science, edited by Lester Embree, 23–45. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2944-4_2

Srubar, Ilja. “Lifeworld and trauma: Selectivity of social memories”. In Theorizing Social Memories: Concepts and Contexts, edited by Gerd Sebald and Jatin Wagle, 18–31. London: Routledge, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887111-2

Srubar, Ilja. “Ist die Lebenswelt ein harmloser Ort? Zur Genese und Bedeutung des Lebensweltbegriffs”. In Phänomenologie und soziologische Theorie, 13–33. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90734-5_1

Srubar, Ilja. “The Relevance of the Irrelevant”. In Relevance and Irrelevance: Theories, Factors and Challenges, edited by Jan Strassheim and Hisashi Nasu, 209–222. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110472509-010

Venturini, Riccardo. “The system of relevances and enclaves”. Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale 124 (2021): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.3280/SR2021-124006

Weber, Max. “The ‘Objectivity’ of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy”. In Collected methodological writings, edited by Hans Henrik Bruun and Sam Whimster, 100–138. London; New York: Routledge, 2012.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH250507002J

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1820-8495 (Print)

ISSN 1820-8509 (Online)