LIMITS OF SEXUAL FREEDOM AND THE NOTION OF PERVERSION: IS SEXUAL ETHICS “APPLIED?”
Abstract
This article has two main points: 1) there are no reasons why sexual ethics should be excluded from fashionable “applied ethics” and “bioethics” investigations, and 2) that the key concepts of “sexual discourse” – especially the concept of “perversion” – deserves full philosophical attention. As an example, the author offers a brief analysis of the reasons why, despite the ruling “libertarian paradigm,” the concept of “perversion” should be kept in ordinary language.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Darwall, G., Gibbard, A. & Railton, P. “Toward fin de siècle ethics: Some trends.” Philosophical Review 101 (1992): 115 – 189.
De Sade, M. The Complete Justine, Philosophy in the Bedroom, and Other Writings, New York, NY: Grove Press, 1965
Hare, R. M. Essays on the Moral Concepts, London: Macmillan, 1972
Liao, S. M. (ed.). Moral Brain: The Neuroscience of Morality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016
Mill J. S. (1977). On Liberty. In Collected Works on J. S Mill, edited by Robson J. M., Vol. 18, 213 – 310. Toronto & Buffalo: Toronto University Press, 1977
Nagel, T. (2009). Sexual Perversion. In Philosophy and Sex, edited by Baker, R. B., and Wininger, K. J., 31 – 43. Armherst, New York: Prometheus Books, 2009
Nozick, R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1974
Primoratz, I. Ethics and Sex. Oxford: Routledge, 1999
Scruton, R. Sexual Desire, London: Continuum, [1986] 2006
Singer, P. Practical Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3rd Edition, [1980, 1993] 2011
Slote, M.. Inapplicable Concepts and Sexual Perversion. In Philosophy & Sex, edited by Baker, R. and Elliston F. 262 – 267. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1975
Stevenson, Ch. Facts and Values, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963
Wiseman, H. The Myth of the Moral Brain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH1801089C
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 1820-8495 (Print)
ISSN 1820-8509 (Online)