A CONTRIBUTION TO THE INTERPRETATION OF THE DISPUTE OVER METHOD IN SOCIAL SCIENCES

Nina Pavlović

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH2001071P
First page
061
Last page
071

Abstract


In this article we analyze the basic theoretical assumptions of participants in the Methodenstreit dispute. The opposing views of positivists and historists have been analyzed according to the key positivist rules set out by Kolakowski (1972): phenomenalism, nominalism, status of value judgements and unity of science. In particular, the main consequences of different understandings of the relationship between the methods of the natural and social sciences were discussed: a) understanding of the goal of the social sciences: comprehension and explanation, b) the possibility of discovering universal laws as opposed to contextual analysis of unique phenomena; c) the place of social sciences in the system of sciences. We point to the efforts of the representatives of both directions to affirm the knowledge possibilities of the social sciences, but with different perceptions of the direction of the development of the social sciences - towards conquering the external or internal world.

Keywords

Methodenstreit, positivism, historicism, social science method.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agevall, Ola. A Science of Unique Events: Max Weber's Methodology of the Cultural Sciences, PhD diss., Uppsala University, 1999.

Bostaph, Samuel. „The Methodological Debate between Carl Menger and the German Historists”. Atlantic Economic Journal 6, 3 (1978): 3–16.

Brdar, Milan. Pouke skromnosti: Karl Poper, otvoreno društvo, nauka i filozofija. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike, 2008.

Comte, August. Kurs pozitivne filozofije. Nikšić: Univerzitetska riječ, 1989.

Diltaj, Vilhelm. Uvod u zasnivanje duhovnih nauka. Beograd: Prosveta, 1980.

Dirkem, E. Pravila sociološkog metoda. Beograd: Savremena škola, 1963.

Fiamengo, Ante. Saint-Simon i Auguste Comte. Zagreb: Naprijed, 1987.

Kolakovski, Lešek. Filozofija pozitivizma. Beograd: Prosveta, 1972.

Oakes, Guy. “Value Theory and the Foundations of the Cultural Sciences: Remarks on Rickert.” In Methodology of the social sciences, ethics, and economics in the newer historical school: from Max Weber and Rickert to Sombart and Rothacker, edited by Peter Koslowski, 59– 78. Boston: Springer, 1997.

Menger, Karl. Istraživanja o metodi društvenih nauka, s posebnim osvrtom na političku ekonomiju. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2008.

Milić, Vojin. Sociološki metod. Beograd: Nolit, 2014.

Stojanović, Božo. “Karl Menger i austrijska škola.” U Istraživanja o metodi društvenih nauka, s posebnim osvrtom na političku ekonomiju, 1–25. Beograd: Službeni glasnik, 2008.

Shionoya, Yuichi. The Soul of the German Historical School: Methodological Essays on Schmoller, Weber and Schumpeter. Boston: Springer Science, Business Media, Inc, 2005.

Turner, Jonathan. H. “Explaining the Social World: Historism versus Positivism”. The Sociological Quarterly 47 (2006): 451–463.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUPSPH2001071P

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 1820-8495 (Print)

ISSN 1820-8509 (Online)