THE DEFECTS OF A REIGNING THEORY

Dimitar Ninov

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUVAM2101001N
First page
001
Last page
012

Abstract


Contemporary theoretical musicology, and especially its anglophone section, has been heavily influenced by the ideas and analytical methods of Heinrich Schenker (1868-1935) who was an Austrian. Schenkerian-inspired theory, once imported in the United States from Austria, spread widely on American soil, where it was “enriched” conceptually, and was then re-exported to Canada, Great Britain, Australia, and other English speaking countries. The old American school of harmony that stemmed from the best German, French, and Russian traditions, found itself pushed to the wall by the ever growing Schenkerian school of thought which was erecting a cult of his creator. A “new order” in harmony and analysis was gradually established that regarded tonality as a business between tonic and dominant alone, the rest of the chords being of peripheral importance. This mentality shut the door to diversity and freedom in functional thinking, and opened the door to highly biased harmonic and formal analyses which erased harmonic cadences, presented tonality in black and white, breached syntactical units to create a new way of hearing music (the so-called "distance hearing" or "structural hearing”), and inevitably ended up with the same fundamental structure in melody and harmony, named “Ursatz”. This essay discusses major defects of Schenkerian theory and their negative impact on traditional harmony and analysis.


Keywords

Schenker, analysis, theory, harmony, structure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldwell, E. and C. Schachter, (2003), Harmony and Voice Leading, 3rd ed. Thomson/Schirmer, Belmont.

Brown, M., Dempster D. and Headlam, D., (1997), “The ♯IV(bV) Hypothesis: Testing the Limits of Schenker's Theory of Tonality”, Music Theory Spectrum 19/2: pp. 155‒183.

Caplin, W., (1998), Classical Form, Oxford University Press, New York.

Caplin, W., (2004), “The Classical Cadence: Conceptions and Misconceptions”, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 57/1: pp. 51‒117.

Caplin, W., (2018), “Beyond the Classical Cadence: Thematic Closure in Early Romantic Music”, Music Theory Spectrum, 40/1: pp. 1‒26.

Cohn, R., (1992), “The Autonomy of Motives in Schenkerian Accounts of Tonal Music”, Music Theory Spectrum 14/2: pp. 150‒170.

Cook, N., (1987), A Guide to Musical Analysis, George Braziller, New York.

Henry M., (2011), “Schenker and the Tonal Jazz Repertory”, Tijdschrift voor Muziektheorie 16/1: pp. 1‒20.

Rimsky-Korskakov, N., (1912/1924), Practical Manual of Harmony, Vitol, J.and Steinberg, M. (eds.), Saint Petersburg.

Neymeyer, D., (1987), “The Ascending Urlinie”, Journal of Music Theory 31/2: pp. 275–303

Ninov, D., (2013), “Basic Formal Structures in Music”, Music Theory and Its Methods, 7/13: pp. 179‒208.

Ninov, D., (2016), “Functional Nature of the Cadential Six-Four”, Musicological Annual, LII/1: pp. 73‒96.

Ninov, D., (2021), “Interior Cadences in the Sentence of Schoenberg”, Musicological Annual, upcoming.

Pastille, W. A., (1985), “Ursatz: The Musical Philosophy of Heinrich Schenker", Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.

Salzer, F., (1952), Structural Hearing, Charles Boni, New York.

Schenker, H., (1935/56), Free Composition, translated by Ernst Oster, Wien, Universal Edition.

Temperley, D., (2011), “Composition, Perception, and Schenkerian Theory”, Music Theory Spectrum 33: pp. 146‒68.

Wick, N. L., (1991), “An Historical Approach to Six-Four Chrods”, Theoria 5: pp. 61‒73.

Furtwängler, W., (1954), Wort und Ton, Wiesbaden, Brockhaus: pp. 201–202.

Wikipedia, reference to Ursatz (retrieved in December 2020.)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_structure




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUVAM2101001N

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Print ISSN: 2466-2887
Online ISSN: 2466-2895