USING ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENT DURING THE PANDEMIC BY INDIAN AND UKRAINIAN TEACHERS OF ENGLISH

Oksana Chugai, Arvind Pawar

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FUTLTE220513001C
First page
001
Last page
009

Abstract


The article aimed to analyze the usage of alternative assessment by teachers of English in India and Ukraine during the pandemic. The actuality of the study is related to making teaching English during the pandemic more effective through alternative assessment. Comparing and contrasting the practices of Indian and Ukrainian teachers of English in terms of using alternative assessment provides the data necessary for planning English courses more effectively.  Pedagogical observation, surveys, interviews, and mathematical statistics were used to collect the data. It was established that Indian respondents had a wider range of experience in teaching English. More than half of Indian teachers conducted their lessons online, while Ukrainian teachers mostly had blended lessons. The necessity of training in assessment and learning facilitation was obvious for both Indian and Ukrainian respondents. All the respondents appreciated the students’ involvement in choosing alternative assessment tools. Both Indian and Ukrainian teachers acknowledged the usefulness of a variety of alternative assessment tools. The methods of evaluation preferred by Ukrainian respondents were similar to those preferred by Indian respondents, with peer-evaluation used more often by Indian teachers. The results of the study showed that the respondents from both countries were positive about the impact of portfolios on learners’ motivation. Curricula limitations hindered the application of alternative assessment for both Indian and Ukrainian teachers of English. However, in contrast to Indian teachers’ responses, for Ukrainian teachers, there was one more reason: students’ reluctance. The recommendation is to provide more opportunities for professional development in terms of using alternative assessment.


Keywords

alternative assessment, teachers of English, online, blended, pandemic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Banat, M. (2022). The exploratory practice: An approach for enhancing students’ learning process awareness. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 8(1), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2586

Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158

Chugai, O. Yu., Yamshynska N. V., Svyrydova L. H., & Kutsenok N. M. (2021). Alternative assessment during the pandemic: teachers of English perspective. SWorld Journal, 9(2), 90-99. https://doi.org 10.30888/2663-5712.2021-09-02-039

Etedali, M. M. (2021). Digital Identity and Teachers’ Roles: A Post-COVID-19 Vision. Academia Letters. Article 1791. https://doi:10.20935/al1791

Kırıkkaya, E. B., & Vurkaya, G. (2011). The effect of using alternative assessment activities on students’ success and attitudes in science and technology course. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(2), 885-1004. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ927387

Luiz, A., & Tsutsumi, M. M. A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic: uncontrollability and psychological impacts. Academia Letters, Article 2945. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL2945

Mintz, S. (2009). The Fundamentals of College and University Teaching. Columbia University. https://gsas.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/GSAS_fundamentals_handbook.pdf

Norris, J. M. (2000). Purposeful Language Assessment: Selecting the Right Alternative. English Teaching Forum, 38(1), 41-45. https://americanenglish.state.gov/resources/english-teaching-forum-2012-volume-50-number-3#child-1358

Paudyal, G. R., & Rana, K. (2021). How university lecturers and students interpret opportunities and challenges of online mode of learning. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 7(4), 1006-1022. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2383

Pellegrino, J. W., DiBello, L. V., & Brophy, S. (2014). The science and design of assessment in engineering education. In A. Johri & B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of engineering education research (pp. 571-598). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Perifanou, M., Economides, A. A., & Tzafilkou, K. (2021). Teachers’ Digital Skills Readiness During COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(8), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i08.21011

Pilotti, M. A. E., El Alaoui, K., Hamann, K., & Wilson, B. M. (2021). Causal attribution preferences and prospective self-assessment: The unknowns of the Middle Eastern learner. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 7(1), 265-286. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.1510

Karaman, P., (2021). The impact of self-assessment on academic performance: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 7(4), 1151-1166. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.2344

Rousseau, P. (2018). Best practices in Alternative Assessments. Ryerson University, the Learning & Teaching. https://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/learning-teaching/teaching-resources/assessment/alternative-assessments.pdf

Sa’diyah, A. (2020). Alternative Assessment Practices and Difficulties on EFL Students’ Speaking Skill. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities (IJCAH 2020) (pp. 810-815). Amsterdam/Paris: Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.134




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUTLTE220513001C

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 2560 – 4600 (Print)
ISSN 2560 – 4619 (Online)