A LEXEME-BASED STUDY OF THE AGENTIVE FRENCH SUFFIXES -ANT - EUR AND -ISTE

Samuel T. Owoeye, Olukayode T. Babatunde

DOI Number
10.22190/FULL1801025O
First page
025
Last page
037

Abstract


Construction Morphology which is fast becoming an alternative term to Derivational Morphology is known to be rooted in Lexeme-Based Morphology and is noted for its Lexeme Formation Rules that are formulated to account for the construction of existing derivational words which serve as models for the creation of other yet-to-be-attested words in human languages. The advent of Lexeme-Based Morphology is as a result of the inability of morpheme-based models to adequately account for some morphologically derived words. Proponents of lexeme-based morphology, hence, believe that it is more appropriate to analyze morphologically formed words when lexemes are seen as the basic units of morphological operation. It is in the light of this hypothesis that we set out in this paper to do a lexeme-based study of the agentive French suffixes –ant, –eur and –iste in order to examine its analytical adequacy. After a careful analysis, the study reveals that the lexeme-based approach to construction morphology seems to be more adequate than the morpheme-based approach.


Keywords

lexeme, lexeme-based morphology, French agent nouns, lexeme formation rule, base modification

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anscombre, J.C., (2003), “L‟agent ne fait pas le bonheur : agentivité et aspectualité dans certains noms d‟agent en espagnol et en français”, Thélème, Revista Complutense de Estudios Franceses : pp. 11-27

Aronoff, M., (1976), Word Formation in Generative Grammar, Linguistic Inquiry. Monograph One, Massachusetts, The MIT Press.

Booij, G., (1986), “Form and meaning in morphology: The case of Dutch agent nouns”, Linguistics 24: pp. 503-517.

Cruse, D.A., (1973), “Some Thoughts on Agentivity” Journal of Linguistics 9: pp.11-23

Cutler, A., (1977),” The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing”, Speech Communication 21: pp.3-15

Dowty, D.R., (1991), “Thematic Proto-Roles and Argument Selection”, Language 67, 3: pp. 547-619

Dubois, J., (1962), Etude sur la dérivation suffixale en français moderne et contemporain, Paris, Larousse.

Dubois, J., and Dubois-Charlier, F., (1999), La dérivation suffixale en français, Paris, Nathan.

Dubois, J., Mitterand, H. and Dausat., A., (2006), Dictionnaire étymologique et historique du français, Paris, Larousse.

Fillmore, C.J., (1968), “The Case for Case”, In Harms, R.T., Bach, E. and Fillmore, C.J. (eds) Universals in Linguistic Theory, New York, Academic Press.

Fillmore, C.J., (1982), “Frame semantics”, Linguistics in the Morning Calm Vol.3 no.5: pp.111-137

Foley, W.A., and Van Valin, R., (1984), Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Fradin, B., (2003), Nouvelles approches en morphologie, Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.

Fradin, B., Kerleroux, F., (2003), Quelle base pour les procédés de la morphologie constructionnelle ? In Fradin, B., Dal, N.H., Kerleroux, F., Plénat, M. and Roché, M. (éds) Les unites morphologiques vol. 3 : pp. 76-84.

Grevisse, M., (1993), Le Bon usage 13e édition revue, Paris, Duculot.

Hockett, C.F., (1954), “Two Models of Grammatical Description”, Word 10: pp. 210-234

Laporte, E. (1992), “Adjectifs en –ant dérivés de verbes”, Langue francaise 96 : pp. 30-43

Matthews, P.H., (1974), Morphology. an Introduction to the Theory of Word-Structure, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Owoeye, S. T., (2013), “La structure profonde et la modélisation des règles de construction de lexèmes : l‟exemple de cinq suffixes agentifs du français”, Linguistik Online 60 : pp. 43-58.

Roché, M., (2007), “Logique lexicale et morphologie : la dérivation en –isme”, In Montermini, F., Boyé, G. and Hathout, H., (eds) Selected Proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse, Somerville : Cascadilla. pp. 45-58.

Rosenberg, M., (2008), La formation agentive en français : les composés [VN/A/Adv/P]N/A et les dérivés V-ant, V-eur et V-oir(e), Doctoral thesis, Stockholm University.

Roy, I., and Soare, E., (2010), “Naming Participants in the Event -ant/-eur/-é French Nominals and Compositionality in Morphology”, Table ronde nominalisations, Université de Paris VIII : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00723654/document

Ulland, H., (1993), Les nominalisations agentive et instrumentale en français moderne, Berne, Peter Lang.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL1801025O

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-4702 (Print)

ISSN 2406-0518 (Online)