THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THEORETICAL ASSUMPTIONS IN SERBIAN LANGUAGE TEACHING PRACTICE

Marina S. Janjić, Aleksandar M. Novaković

DOI Number
https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL2001027J
First page
027
Last page
036

Abstract


The subject of this paper is the implementation of theoretical knowledge in the processes of teaching practice realization, while the focus of the research is on identifying the causes of students’ most common mistakes during the realization of the course Professional (methodological) practice of Serbian language teaching at philological faculties. By analyzing the records and material (student portfolios for the realization of the teaching practice) from the exam classes provided by students of the Serbian language and literature from the Faculty of Philosophy in Niš during four academic years (from 2015/16 to 2018/19), we found and analyzed characteristic beginner mistakes, and classified them into six categories: methodological mistakes in class realization, a lack of compliance with teaching principles, a lack of required class structure, unskilled application of teaching forms and methods, unskilled application of teaching aids (and technical aids) and mistakes in behavior and communication. The results obtained point to the complexity of teaching theory (developmental and pedagogical psychology and didactics), which needs to be linked to academic disciplines (linguistics, science of literature and the literary art itself) during the methodological formation of Serbian language and literature classes.

Keywords

teaching theory, methodological practice, successful class, Serbian language, most common mistakes, reflexive practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, Y. M., Bakar, A. R. N., Mahbob, H. M. 2012. “Student’s participation in classroom: What motivates them to speak up?”. Social and Behavioral Sciences 51 (2012): 516–522.

Barati, L. 2015. “The Impact of Eye-contact between Teacher and Student on L2 Learning”. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, Vol. 2, Issue 7 (2015): 222-227.

Čutura, I., Maksimović, J., Janjić, M. 2009. “Test osnovne pismenosti u selekciji studenata - budućih učitelja”. Unapređenje obrazovanja učitelja i nastavnika, 8/1: 337348.

Ilić, P. (2006). Srpski jezik u teoriji i praksi. Novi Sad: Zmaj.

Janjić, M. 2017. Metodički horizonti – odabrana poglavlja metodike nastave srpskog jezika i književnosti. Beograd: NM libris.

Janjić, M., Maksimović, J., Đigić, G., Božić S. 2014. Praktikum za realizaciju profesionalne nastavne prakse sa studentskim portfoliom, Niš: Filozofski fakultet.

Janjić, M., Novaković, A. 2015. Nastavno dizajniranje časova srpskog jezika. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.

Milutinović, V. 2009. “Faktori upotrebe IKT u obrazovanju: mentori i budući učitelji”. Unapređenje obrazovanja učitelja i nastavnika, 8/1 (2009): 175188.

Novaković, A. 2016. Hiperkorekcija u govoru učenika i studenata na području prizrensko-timočkog dijalekta. Književnost i jezik, 63(34): 333-350.

Novaković, A. 2018. “Refleksivni model metodičke prakse na Filozofskom fakultetu u Nišu”. Metodički vidici 8: 11-30.

Petrović, D. 2009. “Tradicionalni i savremeni pogled na mentorstvo u sferi obrazovanja budućih nastavnika”. Unapređenje obrazovanja učitelja i nastavnika, 8/1: 5768.

Požar, X. 2016. “Kompetencije nastavnika u savremenom školstvu”. Sinteze 10: 23-34.

Schön, D. 1987. Education the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, Oxford: Jossey-Bass.

Tadić, A. 2014. Savremeni modeli i strategije uspostavljanja i održavanja razredne discipline (unpublished PhD thesis). Beograd: Filozofski fakultet.

Vilotijević, M., Vilotijević, N. 2008. Heuristička nastava. Vranje: Učiteljski fakultet.

Župljanin, M. 2013. “Nastavnik kao uzor u vaspitanju učenika”. Univerzitetska misao 12/2 (2013): 162-174.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FULL2001027J

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISSN 0354-4702 (Print)

ISSN 2406-0518 (Online)